Back to @demishassabis's profile

Demis Hassabis engagement report

@demishassabis - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
0.404%
225K views on a typical post
Reach
12.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
908
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
78 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 908 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 225K times each, and 0.404% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Demis Hassabis's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Demis Hassabis sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,071 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,527 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202627x their median

    I’ve been working towards AGI my whole life, and as we enter this pivotal moment, I’m stepping into a new role as Chair of Google DeepMind & Chief Scientist of Alphabet. This will allow me to focus on long-term strategy, and accelerating scientific breakthroughs, including leaning into my work at Isomorphic to help cure disease. I’m excited that @koraykv will be stepping up to lead GDM as SVP, alongside @joshwoodward and our exec team. I could not be more excited and confident about our amazing next chapter! 🚀 https://t.co/2WtlIIlTUa

    21K1.7K1.1K5072.0M viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202618x their median

    A bit of news: After nearly 9 years, I have decided to leave Google DeepMind and join Anthropic (after taking some time to recharge). I am incredibly grateful for my time at GDM. @demishassabis took a real chance letting me lead the AlphaFold team just six months after finishing my PhD, and the entire GDM team taught me so much about how to do great science. GDM is a special place, and I’ll still be excited to hear about what amazing things they discover next.

    14K9726157386.2M viewsView on X
  • May 25, 202625x their median

    Google Omni might be too powerful 🫥 https://t.co/y1qgKmfg00

    15K9613241911.3M viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202616x their median

    Meet Gemma 4 12B! A unified, encoder-free multimodal model designed to bring high-performance intelligence directly to your laptop, and released under an Apache 2.0 license. Bridging the gap between edge efficiency and advanced reasoning. Here is what’s new with Gemma 4 12B: 👇 https://t.co/gf4FZv0WZb

    12K1.7K3936033.3M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 202612x their median

    We’re dropping Gemini Omni: our first step towards a model that can create anything from anything - starting with video. It combines Gemini’s intelligence with our generative media systems - representing a leap forward in world understanding, multimodality, and editing 🧵

    8.4K1.2K4164691.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20268.4x their median

    Google Search broke all prior usage records and saw its highest usage in history right after Argentina scored their winning goal in yesterday’s match! 🤯 Great to see the global excitement for the World Cup... can't wait for the semis and final!

    6.5K857145126536K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20266.9x their median

    Meet DiffusionGemma! An experimental open model that explores a fast approach to text generation, released under an Apache 2.0 license. Moving beyond sequential, token-by-token processes to generate entire blocks of text simultaneously. Here’s what’s new with DiffusionGemma: 👇 https://t.co/iaVMPr0WKx

    5.0K806162272999K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 20269.1x their median

    Gemini Omni is here, and we’ve been seeing amazing creations all week. Here are some standouts 👇

    5.6K27021223830K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 20263.7x their median

    What's something that you're surprised @GeminiApp can't do well, and we should have fixed a long time ago?

    1.4K761.9K51650K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 20264.0x their median

    I uploaded a screenshot of Google Maps to Gemini Omni with a route drawn on it. Then I prompted it to create a first person view of someone driving a taxi cab along the route in the reference image. Pretty close to the real thing. https://t.co/F5XCm5r36w

    2.3K20479722.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 908 interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 225K times each, and 0.404% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is Demis Hassabis's engagement rate on X?
Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,808,015 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Demis Hassabis sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,071 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @demishassabis have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @demishassabis post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Demis Hassabis (@demishassabis) Engagement Rate - 0.05% | PlayerSells