PlayerSells
Back to @deltanmd's profile

Deltan Dallagnol engagement report

@deltanmd - 1.8M followers on X

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.115%
of 1.8M followers
Per impression
7.79%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
1.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.094%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.37/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 7.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #diariodopoder, #justiça.

Measured over 85 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #diariodopoder, #justiça.

Compared with accounts its own size

Deltan Dallagnol's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, Deltan Dallagnol sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,151 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.047% to 0.324%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.324%
p902.53%
p99360.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,151 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 450,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.324%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile360.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link35% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 35% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 368 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20268.1x their median

    Passando para avisar que o juiz americano identificou a inserção fraudulenta da entrada do Filipe Martins nos EUA e determinou que o nome, nao apenas de quem inseriu, mas de quem mandou inserir, seja revelado. Essa história esta arrastada, eu sei, mas foi MUITA GENTE tentando impedir que esse momento chegasse. O CBP segue tentando impedir a entrega desses nomes, mas me parece que a justiça americana (graças a Deus) é bem diferente da nossa...

    13K3.3K19587133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.0x their median

    Glenn Greenwald diz que a Globo e o Establishment estavam morrendo de medo do Bolsonaro e, por isso, tudo se justificava e era tolerado para tirá-lo do jogo. Hoje, o Establishment quer voltar à normalidade, mas agora é tarde demais. https://t.co/PKzdk8mgnQ

    12K2.8K13230170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20265.1x their median

    🚨 Se este país fosse sério, o futuro de muita gente não seria na Suíça. Seria em Bangu.

    9.2K1.3K691151K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20265.0x their median

    NOTA PÚBLICA O episódio envolvendo o afastamento do presidente do Tribunal de Contas do Maranhão pelo ministro Flávio Dino reforça uma questão que o Brasil precisa enfrentar: quais são os limites da atuação do STF e como preservar a imparcialidade e o equilíbrio entre os Poderes? Não se questiona a necessidade de investigar os graves fatos noticiados e punir eventuais culpados. Questiona-se a imparcialidade de um ministro que governou o Maranhão por dois mandatos para atuar em casos que envolvem o Estado e o grupo político com o qual rompeu politicamente. Além da ausência de competência do STF, Dino deveria se declarar impedido, assim como deveria ter feito ao julgar Bolsonaro. Isso também vale para Alexandre de Moraes, que se declarou vítima dos atos que ele próprio analisou. Além disso, conduz um inquérito interminável iniciado em 2019 e que coloca uma espada na cabeça de qualquer pessoa que ouse criticar sua atuação. A relativização do foro e o cerceamento de garantias individuais no processo contra Bolsonaro foram inúmeras. Para citar um único exemplo, mais de 200 milhões de mensagens e áudios foram entregues à defesa às vésperas do julgamento, tornando humanamente impossível sua análise. Não se trata de defender este ou aquele personagem. Trata-se de garantir que a mesma regra valha para todos. A imprensa noticiou, além disso, que um Ministro do Supremo teria atuado para impedir o apoio de partidos de centro à candidatura de Flávio Bolsonaro. Se isso é verdade, a autoridade atuou claramente a favor de Lula, o que desequilibra o pleito eleitoral e atinge frontalmente a democracia. Urge uma reforma do Judiciário, pois o STF é essencial à democracia e precisa voltar a exercer sua missão de verdadeira Corte Constitucional, deixando as disputas políticas para a política. Rogério Marinho (PL/RN) Líder da Oposição no Senado

    8.2K2.1K1452658K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.3x their median

    O STF está interferindo diretamente na eleição. O STF está interferindo diretamente na eleição. O STF está interferindo diretamente na eleição. O STF está interferindo diretamente na eleição. https://t.co/WQeouYHUYo

    6.9K2.0K414036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.0x their median

    Para a tristeza do PT, ESTOU ELEGÍVEL! O Ministério Público Eleitoral acaba de se manifestar a favor da minha elegibilidade e pediu que a Justiça rejeite as impugnações contra mim. Tentaram transformar minha cassação em uma sentença para me afastar definitivamente da política. Mas a mentira não resiste aos fatos. Agora a missão continua no Senado: enfrentar a corrupção e o crime organizado, fiscalizar os poderosos e colocar limites nos abusos de autoridade. 🇧🇷 No Paraná, Deltan é 300. Compartilhe este vídeo e ajude a enterrar de vez as mentiras do PT.

    7.0K9593361883K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.6x their median

    GLOBONEWS DETONA PGR/GONET Otávio Guedes questionou por que a PGR “só acordou agora” para a ausência de foro no caso Lulinha. Se há outros processos no STF envolvendo pessoas sem foro privilegiado, por que a PGR não questionou antes? Para Guedes, a medida soa como “um voto de desconfiança” em André Mendonça. Sadi afirmou que a PGR está “muito dentro desse jogo da política”.

    6.1K1.3K9930176K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.2x their median

    O Globo: Os ventos da política - É grave a informação de que setores do STF pressionaram partidos do Centrão a não aderirem à candidatura de Flavio Bolsonaro. https://t.co/c6VV67XlId

    5.1K1.2K0262365K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.2x their median

    O Globo: Caminhos tortuosos - É inacreditável que um ministro do STF possa servir de mediador de um encontro político. https://t.co/cj4CO1DBzc

    5.4K1.0K1150141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.0x their median

    PF descobre que lobista do Careca do INSS comprou duas joias para ex-chefe de gabinete de Lula https://t.co/CHe0yZLaZD

    4.5K1.3K39612485K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#diariodopoder#justiça

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.1K interactions against 1.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 85 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 7.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 85 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 35% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #diariodopoder, #justiça.

What is Deltan Dallagnol's engagement rate on X?
Deltan Dallagnol (@deltanmd) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 85 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,813,100 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, Deltan Dallagnol sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,151 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @deltanmd have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @deltanmd post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going