Back to @dehparadox's profile

Dehparadox engagement report

@dehparadox - 119K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 119K followers
Per impression
0.48%
4.5K views on a typical post
Reach
3.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 482x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #controlresonant, #premiodamadeguionlolasalvador, #sitges2026.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #controlresonant, #premiodamadeguionlolasalvador, #sitges2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dehparadox's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, Dehparadox sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 364 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 2026482x their median

    🚨 JIM CAVIEZEL JUST DROPPED A NUCLEAR TRUTH BOMB Actor Jim Caviezel has again said the quiet part out loud — and this time he laid out the darkest allegations yet: According to Caviezel: • Adrenochrome is a real chemical compound — listed under NIH • He claims it is “10x more potent than heroin” and used by elites • He says the demand is so organised that it cannot exist without intelligence-agency involvement • He alleges there are multiple Epstein-style islands, not just one • And that some networks tied to trafficking, organ harvesting, and cartel violence are far bigger than the public has been told He didn’t stop there. Caviezel pointed to: Mexico’s 110,000 missing people Cartels with military-grade weapons Bio-labs receiving high-value “materials” Intelligence agencies looking the other way High-level protection for traffickers who should be in prison And then the bombshell: “Epstein Island isn’t the only sex island out there.” For years the media laughed this stuff off as conspiracy. Then Epstein was arrested. Then the flight logs came out. Then the VIPs scrambled for cover. Caviezel is calling out what many already suspect: There is a global network. It crosses borders. It overlaps with intelligence, cartels, NGOs, and political elites. And the cover-up is deeper than anyone imagined. This is not about Hollywood. This is not about one island. This is about an entire system rotten to the core — and terrified of being exposed. The truth ALWAYS leaks. And the dam is cracking. Brace yourself.

    7.2K3.2K159105203K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026322x their median

    Thesis (1996) Dir.Alejandro Amenábar https://t.co/yt8OnAj2ev

    5.8K1.1K122131.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 10, 202056x their median

    ¿Pero qué es esto? ¿todo el mundo poniendo hilos sobre películas de Corea del Sur después del éxito de 'Parasite' en los #Oscars y voy a ser el único que no haga uno? SUS VAIS A CAGAR. ¡HILO VA! (Intentaré ir por orden cronológico, y películas de todo tipo). https://t.co/VxC1QNfTuc

    8422748132View on X
  • Sep 23, 202612x their median

    Tom Cruise Is the Last Great Movie Star Still Chasing His Oscar. Can He Overcome 'Digger' Reviews to Get Him There? https://t.co/M7jdCzl0Jo

    1962528546K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.7x their median

    ¿Descalza en la alfombra roja? Margaret Qualley estrena las nuevas sandalias sin suela de Chanel https://t.co/PR5JpzixxF

    397493148K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    La broma de poner películas españolas en cines, estando rodadas en otros idiomas distintos al español y que posteriormente doblan sin avisar de que es una sesión doblada, ¿va a terminar en algún momento? Es ridículo ir a ver una película como Cronos y encontrartela doblada.

    3551017.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Peor aún que ponerse de lado del opresor, es ponerse de perfil alegando no sé que mierdas. Vaya decepción con la basura de Ed Sheeran. Y, por encima de todos, demostrando que se puede ser justa y coherente sin dejarse amedrentar por los que intentan cayar esa barbarie: https://t.co/JDSENTtm0E

    231203.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Aunque sabía de sobra que serie era, nunca me había dado por ver la británica 'Skins' hasta casi 20 años después de su estreno. ¿Se puede ser más británico que el personaje de Jack O'Connell en la serie? Es difícil reunir absolutamente todos los tópicos que tienen juntos 😂. https://t.co/ZBaa4dYKDZ

    152303.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Vamos Zach Cregger sal a bailar que tu lo haces fenomenal, tu cuerpo se mueve como una palmera suave suave su su suave suave suave su su suave suave suave su su suave https://t.co/RfddZko6sq

    141202.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Vamos allá @remedygames #ControlResonant https://t.co/mdawPpBToT

    121201.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#controlresonant#premiodamadeguionlolasalvador#sitges2026

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.5K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video, 38% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 482x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #controlresonant, #premiodamadeguionlolasalvador, #sitges2026.

What is Dehparadox's engagement rate on X?
Dehparadox (@dehparadox) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 119,276 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, Dehparadox sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dehparadox have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dehparadox post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going