Back to @deenayaah's profile

winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ engagement report

@deenayaah - 458K followers on X

Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.106%
of 458K followers
Per impression
0.915%
53K views on a typical post
Reach
11.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
487
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.93/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 487 interactions against 458K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.915% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #boxing.

Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #boxing.

Compared with accounts its own size

winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.106%, winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 202637x their median

    Life before I was introduced to gambling https://t.co/CDtmmOeURT

    16K2.4K120132514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.7x their median

    Find a way to chop Sportybet money now because the international break will be for almost a month 😩🤣

    3.9K229606160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.9x their median

    If I tell you that by September you will be a millionaire will you believe me ? šŸ‘€

    2.3K2273442463K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.6x their median

    In seven days all the eyes viewing this tweet now will win millions šŸ“Œ

    2.3K2131831665K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.6x their median

    Goal rush ⚽ https://t.co/QYmYjRSbP2

    1.8K29117211150K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.9x their median

    Your broke era is dead and gone. This season is your RICH era. Claim it

    1.6K154156852K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.8x their median

    Kindly drop your Sportybet ID, I will fund 30 beautiful people tonight after work to chase the international break games let's go!

    858138868472K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    The rest are sleeping 🄱 only the people winning millions this month will like this post

    1.6K8644018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.2x their median

    Mixed longshot (double edge) 17k x 10k odds https://t.co/NUhgZ0YuFr

    1.2K2221438197K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.1x their median

    Your name is boldly written on the next massive payout Claim it

    1.2K104162748K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bet9jacode#bet9ja#boxing#itauma

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 487 interactions against 458K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 53K times each, and 0.915% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 37x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bet9jacode, #bet9ja, #boxing.

What is winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ's engagement rate on X?
winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ (@deenayaah) has an engagement rate of 0.106%, based on the median interactions across 121 original posts from the last 30 days against 458,032 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.106%, winning mentality šŸ—ļøšŸŒŸ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @deenayaah have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @deenayaah post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going