Back to @deebowmanbarker's profile

Dee Barker engagement report

@deebowmanbarker - 52K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.593%
of 52K followers
Per impression
15.5%
2.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
308
interactions (median)
Saved
0.703%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 93% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 52K followers, an engagement rate of 0.593%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 15.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dee Barker's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.593%, Dee Barker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video45% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 20268.8x their median

    A tsunami of blessings is about to overtake you. God is going to exceed your expectations in ways you never imagined‼️🙌🏼

    2.4K195118922K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20261.7x their median

    There’s a major overnight miracle headed to your address, and it is going to leave your critics dumbfounded‼️👊🏼SWEET SLEEP!😴

    412306713.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.6x their median

    God is in control even when you aren’t! He is never surprised, uncertain, or scrambling to fix what’s broken. He is steadfast and constant, and He knows exactly what you need and how to get it to you. Praying for you that today is a day of turnaround‼️👊🏻

    394396933.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.6x their median

    What you thought was lost is coming back full circle. God redeems the time, and restores what’s been broken‼️🙌🏼 SWEET SLEEP! 😴

    420354903.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20261.6x their median

    Expect to hear good news tomorrow. God is working tonight behind the scenes; He is fighting for you‼️🙌🏼 SWEET SLEEP!😴

    396326033.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20261.6x their median

    Stay expectant this week; things can shift suddenly, and your season can change faster than you ever dreamed possible‼️🙌🏼 https://t.co/GPdhhJbZy9

    399404802.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20261.5x their median

    By this time tomorrow, expect to receive good news. God is moving behind the scenes tonight, working on your behalf and fighting for you‼️🙌🏼 SWEET SLEEP! 😴

    400334043.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 2026

    I declare that October through December will be a season of promotion, advancement, and divine acceleration for you. This will be a season of advancement without unnecessary struggle, where God’s favor makes room for you‼️👊🏻 SWEET SLEEP! 😴

    332296122.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    You’ve been seeking God, you’ve been waiting on Him, and NOW He is moving situations you didn’t even know were before you. He’s aligning every detail for YOU; God’s got YOU‼️👊🏻 SWEET SLEEP! 🥰 https://t.co/mwRhMZwcyg

    335364832.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    God is getting ready to blow your mind with unexpected blessings‼️🙌🏼

    320385802.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 308 interactions against 52K followers, an engagement rate of 0.593%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 2.0K times each, and 15.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.7K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

What is Dee Barker's engagement rate on X?
Dee Barker (@deebowmanbarker) has an engagement rate of 0.593%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 52,093 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.593%, Dee Barker sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @deebowmanbarker have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @deebowmanbarker post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going