Debbi Kay engagement report
@debbiediscovers - 53K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.227% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 2089x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Debbi Kay sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 6685 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 4, 20252089x their median
Your entire life will change the day you realize discipline is the highest form of self-respect. It’s choosing what you want most over what you want now. It’s keeping your word. It’s an act of service to your future self.
- May 3, 20261785x their median
The biggest cheat code on the planet is the ability to be in a good mood regardless of what's going on in your life. Not letting external events dictate how you feel is a skill we can learn. If you can train yourself to be in a bad mood you can train yourself to be in a good one.
- Jul 12, 20261517x their median
2002 England vs Argentina, when Beckham scored a penalty kick and won the game for England. I was lucky enough to be working in Japan at the time so watched the game live. Will England do it again this year???? Come on England!!! 🏴 https://t.co/u3E5rFEroV
- Jun 9, 2025581x their median
INVEST IN AMERICA 🇺🇸 President Donald J. Trump discusses "Trump Accounts" in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, providing every newborn American child a $1,000 tax-deferred investment account for a prosperous future! https://t.co/6NEHEwZtWt
- Jul 6, 2025195x their median
I’ve tried to ask new people, what are you obsessed with lately? Instead of what do you do. So much more interesting, highly recommend.
- Jul 9, 2025152x their median
The most successful people I know are weird af.
- May 4, 2026119x their median
1/A Nature editorial dropped a line last year that I can't stop thinking about: "If writing is thinking, are we not then reading the thoughts of the LLM rather than those of the researchers?" But the real story isn't about AI. It's about every "upgrade" we've made in the last 50 years. 2/The study behind it: 36 students, 256 EEG sensors, handwriting vs typing the same words. Handwriting lit up theta and alpha bands across the brain — the frequencies tied to memory and deep encoding. Typing didn't. The motor act of forming letters was producing the cognition. Not recording it. Producing it. 3/The editorial's uncomfortable conclusion: writing a paper is how a researcher discovers what they actually believe. The messy first draft isn't a step toward thinking. It IS the thinking. Which means every time we outsource writing, we're not saving time. We're saving ourselves from our own cognition. 4/That got me asking a bigger question: If handwriting was a thinking technology we accidentally threw away, what OTHER thinking technologies have we discarded without realizing what they actually did? The answer is: a disturbing number of them. 🧵👇 5/ MENTAL MATH We stopped doing arithmetic in our heads because calculators were faster. What we lost wasn't the ability to multiply. It was the intuition for when numbers smell wrong. A person who does mental math develops a feel for magnitudes. When a spreadsheet says revenue grew 847% and you don't flinch — that's the immune system we killed. 6/ MEMORIZATION We abandoned memorizing poetry, speeches, and case law as "rote learning." But memorizing a text isn't storing words. It's reconstructing someone else's reasoning inside your own neural architecture. A lawyer who memorized case law didn't just recall faster. The logic of precedent was wired into how they thought. Search gave us access to everything and deep familiarity with nothing. 7/ LETTER WRITING Before texting, people wrote long letters — to friends, family, even to themselves in journals. Writing "I'm furious at Mark because..." forces you to choose which details matter, notice gaps in your story, and hear how you sound to someone else. A text message — "ugh Mark is the worst" — skips all of that processing. The letter was therapy. The journal was self-examination. We replaced both with venting. 8/ ORAL DEBATE From Athenian assemblies to parliamentary debate societies, humans practiced building arguments in real time, responding to counterarguments, holding a thread across long exchanges. Twitter replaced construction with reaction. You don't build an argument anymore. You emit a position. Reacting feels like thinking. It isn't. 9/ NAVIGATING WITHOUT GPS When you read a map, you built a mental model of where you were in relation to everything else. You developed judgment about distance and time through experience. GPS gives you turn-by-turn instructions. You arrive having learned nothing about the territory. Studies confirm: GPS users show less hippocampal activity and worse spatial memory. The navigation WAS the spatial thinking. 10/ APPRENTICESHIP Before credentials and certifications, you learned complex skills by watching a master for years. A carpenter didn't check a chart to know if wood was properly seasoned. They could feel it, smell it, hear it. We kept the explicit knowledge (checklists, procedures) and discarded the tacit knowledge (embodied intuition). We often discarded the more valuable half. 11/ COOKING WITHOUT RECIPES Before apps and meal kits with pre-measured ingredients, cooking required holding a mental model of the whole dish — how flavors interact, how timing sequences interleave. A meal kit that sends you exactly 15g of pre-sliced ginger eliminates the thinking. You execute without understanding. And when something goes wrong, you can't adapt — because you never had the model. Only the instructions. 12/ BOREDOM This might be the biggest one. Before smartphones filled every idle moment, humans were regularly bored. Waiting rooms. Bus rides. Lying in fields. Boredom is uncomfortable, so the brain responds by wandering — making unexpected connections, revisiting problems, running simulations. We didn't eliminate boredom. We eliminated the thinking that boredom produced. 13/The pattern across ALL of these is identical to the handwriting finding: We identified a practice that seemed inefficient. We replaced it with something faster. We only later noticed that the "inefficiency" was where the cognition lived. The slow part wasn't a bug. It was the thinking. 14/Here's what's wild. Modern productivity advice now sells us BACK the friction we removed — but as formal techniques: — "Premortems" replace the doubts that surfaced naturally in journal writing — "Decision frameworks" replace the judgment that apprenticeship built — "Digital detoxes" replace the boredom we used to get for free 15/Every tool that saves you cognitive effort is, to some degree, saving you FROM cognition itself. The question isn't whether to use the tools. It's whether you've preserved a practice that does the thinking the tool removed. 16/The Nature editorial drew the line at LLMs writing scientific papers. But the line is everywhere: Your GPS is thinking about the city so you don't have to. Your calculator is thinking about quantities so you don't have to. Your meal kit is thinking about dinner so you don't have to. Your phone is thinking during your idle moments so you don't have to. The convenience was never free. You were paying in cognition. You just couldn't see the bill. 17/One last thought. The EEG study showed that the hand forming letters activated brain regions that typing didn't. The hand wasn't recording thought. It was generating it. Every practice on this list worked the same way. The doing was the thinking. When we optimized away the doing, we didn't save the thinking. We lost it. /end If this changed how you think about "efficiency," share it with someone who needs the slow version.
- Jun 4, 202667x their median
Even the Singapore Zoo is hiring an AI Specialist to build agentic solutions. It seems like every company is trending towards hiring someone to build stuff that can help each department in the organization to work more efficiently. Vibe coding experience with working solutions to showcase will come in handy.
- Jul 6, 202538x their median
The idea of #crypto is romantic. Decentralised, permissionless, trustless. In reality, it’s Trump NFTs, Chad meme coins, Discord grifters, and wallets getting hacked. TL;DR: It’s not the future. It’s a casino with better branding. Prove me wrong?
- Jun 1, 20265.0x their median
S’pore to create a registry of AI agents for 150,000 public officers amid AI push https://t.co/8FISaaDozr
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.227% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 2089x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Debbi Kay's engagement rate on X?
- Debbi Kay (@debbiediscovers) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 53,240 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Debbi Kay sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @debbiediscovers have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @debbiediscovers post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.