Back to @dearemon's profile

禿道道🐟 engagement report

@dearemon - 72K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 72K followers
Per impression
0.991%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.991% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 373x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

禿道道🐟's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, 禿道道🐟 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 51 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 2026373x their median

    睡觉真的太牛逼了。 健身是在用短期的痛苦换长期的舒服,抽烟喝酒是在用短期的舒服换长期的痛苦。 只有睡觉是一直都很舒服,睡觉的时候舒服,睡饱了更舒服,睡够了对身体还挺有帮助。 睡觉真的太牛逼了,大家都应该多睡觉。

    6.0K45125834147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026156x their median

    分享一个我偷偷用了很久的人生作弊技巧 每当觉得当下特别幸福、特别想把这一刻留住的时候,我就会默默放一首喜欢的歌,最好是刚好贴合此刻心情的那种。然后三五年后,只要那首歌随机播到,闭上眼睛,整个画面就会像电影一样在脑海里重播。 音乐真的是很犯规的时光机。 气味也是,照片也是。

    2.4K273871952K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 202556x their median

    人靠衣装画靠框啊 https://t.co/XkprHaJLMD

    90829735840K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202622x their median

    我很喜欢中文,现在正在学习中。 虽然能看懂,但还会说。 我很喜欢听别人说中文。 一直都很想交一个中国朋友。 有没有人愿意和我做朋友呀〜

    2560137021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202615x their median

    坏了坏了,这下好了 坏了坏了,这下坏了 好了好了, 这下好了 好了好了,这下坏了 有没有语文课代表告诉我一下,这四条哪个是情况最严重的?🤣

    212347135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.2x their median

    真的,早點睡覺,你的人生真的就會越來越好。只要你能堅持早睡早起不熬夜,把這個最簡單的生活方式貫徹落實下來,你會發現真的生活中那些類似於渾身沒力,情緒易低落內耗的毛病都不是問題!試著去早睡早起吧,清晨的朝霞布滿天空,遠處小鳥嘰嘰喳喳地喧鬧,重啟的人生是如此的美妙。

    121131315.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.2x their median

    之前看过有人说,之所以一个月1w听起来很多,但是一年12w听起来却很少,是因为大家普遍会把1w当作生活费看,但是12w却是和房价车价比较。

    12602119.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.7x their median

    鲁提辖拳打皮可西 https://t.co/BsWH1VyO1G

    5141202.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.4x their median

    不知道为什么,对新疆西藏两个地方非常向往,对国内其他景区就感觉一般。可能因为新疆烧烤好吃,西藏有雪山?不知道了,就是一种莫名的想去。

    803414.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.3x their median

    年轻人还是要有自己的想法 不想运动你就不要动 不想恋爱你就不要爱 不想结婚你就不要结 不想上班你就不要想了 明天星期一,请大家不要忘记闹铃⏰🥹

    2521502.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 72K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.991% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 373x its own typical post.

What is 禿道道🐟's engagement rate on X?
禿道道🐟 (@dearemon) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 72,116 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, 禿道道🐟 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dearemon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dearemon post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going