Back to @dclzscrypto's profile

Descentralizados Crypto engagement report

@dclzscrypto - 171K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 171K followers
Per impression
0.317%
4.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.58%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.317% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 265x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Descentralizados Crypto's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Descentralizados Crypto sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 386 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 2026265x their median

    Un hombre que estaba de vacaciones en Bali perdió 14,000$ en cripto tras darle su móvil desbloqueado a una mujer que quería intercambiar instagrams. Ella aprovechó el momento para robarle las criptomonedas mientras el hombre pensaba que estaba ligando. https://t.co/TNfydj6DXn

    3.5K1433781.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202615x their median

    🚨 URGENTE: El presidente Trump acaba de reunirse con sus asesores para hablar específicamente sobre la votación de la CLARITY Act, la ley relacionada con Bitcoin y las criptomonedas. El mensaje de Trump es claro: La CLARITY Act debe aprobarse. https://t.co/MSAxB0AhXG

    177278116K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202611x their median

    En 2013, este hombre le suplicó a todo el mundo que comprara Bitcoin. «Te sugiero que cojas 1$, compres algunos Bitcoins y los guardes en una billetera. Es solo 1$». https://t.co/Mu1vLXDXPt

    136162213K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20269.8x their median

    Este es mi top altcoins para el próximo ciclo alcista. Qué te parece? Cuál añadirías o quitarías? 👀 https://t.co/WSRu3MuqvJ

    1151012027K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20269.4x their median

    🔥 EL CEO DE TELEGRAM: “LLEGARÁ UN MOMENTO EN QUE BITCOIN VALDRÁ $1,000,000” “Los gobiernos siguen imprimiendo dinero como si no hubiera un mañana. Nadie está imprimiendo Bitcoin. Bitcoin ha venido para quedarse.” https://t.co/Ja0gxL3hFu

    11013717.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20268.6x their median

    Un experto en criptomonedas ayudó a un indio a lanzar su propia memecoin. No te creerás lo que pasó en apenas unos segundos... Su cara lo dice todo. https://t.co/OF99JhDEJV

    11335020K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20268.0x their median

    Compró 80 bitcoins. Los pasó a una Ledger nueva. Apuntó las 24 palabras a mano y las guardó en una caja fuerte. Diez días después se los vaciaron todos. 6,6 millones de dólares en una sola transacción. Y lo hizo casi todo bien. Por eso tenéis que leer esto. La Ledger no la compró en cualquier sitio. La compró a CryptoBilis, un distribuidor oficial de Ledger en Asia. Ledger ha confirmado que dentro del dispositivo de una víctima había un chip que no tenía que estar ahí. Cuando la wallet le enseñó sus palabras, alguien más las estaba viendo. Y no es solo él. Ya se habla de más de 86 millones robados. Cuando lo leí me acordé de mí hace años. Uno de mis errores fue tenerlo todo en exchanges. El día que por fin das el paso de guardar tus criptos tú mismo, te sientes seguro. Este hombre se sentía seguro. La autocustodia sigue siendo el camino. Pero tu wallet es tan segura como el sitio donde la compras. Esto es lo que haría hoy si tienes una wallet física o vas a comprarla: 1. Cómprala solo en la web oficial de la marca. Ni Amazon, ni segunda mano, ni el amigo que la vende más barata. Aquí el problema vino de un distribuidor oficial. Imagínate de los demás. 2. Si la compraste a CryptoBilis en los últimos 90 días, Ledger lo dice claro: mueve tus fondos ya a una wallet nueva con palabras nuevas. 3. Las 24 palabras las genera tu dispositivo, delante de ti. Si viene con palabras ya escritas, con una tarjeta "con tu frase" o con un PIN ya puesto, devuélvela. Es una estafa. 4. Esas palabras, en papel o en metal. Nunca en una foto, nunca en el móvil, nunca escritas en un ordenador. Y nunca se las des a nadie que te las pida "para ayudarte". 5. No metas todo de golpe. Empieza con una cantidad pequeña y comprueba que todo funciona. 6. No lo tengas todo en el mismo sitio. Si una cartera cae, que no caiga todo. Llevamos seis años en esto y la lección siempre es la misma: lo que más dinero hace perder casi nunca es una mala compra. Es un descuido con la seguridad. Guárdalo y pásaselo a quien tenga una wallet física.

    831315120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.3x their median

    Este chico grabó uno de los videos más legendarios. En 2013, grabó su reacción cuando Bitcoin alcanzó los 100$ por primera vez. 11 años después, en 2024, repitió el momento cuando Bitcoin llegó a los 100,000$. https://t.co/0APnIRiiNy

    9093012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.4x their median

    🔥 Acaban de presentar un proyecto de ley para crear una Reserva Estratégica de Bitcoin en EE. UU. “Esta ley creará una reserva de Bitcoin y otra de activos digitales dentro del Departamento del Tesoro para custodiar los Bitcoin en manos del Gobierno.” https://t.co/AOKBMN3Ite

    7414205.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20265.2x their median

    Esta máquina expendedora vendía Bitcoins por 7 dólares en 2012. Al comprar, te daban una moneda física junto con una clave para conseguir un Bitcoin real. https://t.co/kuKiM8iZhv

    684106.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.317% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 265x its own typical post.

What is Descentralizados Crypto's engagement rate on X?
Descentralizados Crypto (@dclzscrypto) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 170,803 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Descentralizados Crypto sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dclzscrypto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dclzscrypto post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going