Back to @davidicke's profile

David Icke engagement report

@davidicke - 826K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 826K followers
Per impression
0.175%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
4.09%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 826K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.175% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 612x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Icke's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, David Icke sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 105 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 2026612x their median

    Elon is actively trying to suppress this account, and this video. They're losing and they're trying to steer the narrative by censoring. Post this video everywhere. Fuck Elon. Fuck Trump. https://t.co/ulssvmp0Ya

    24K12K294256489K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026401x their median

    BREAKING: Iran declares the Strait of Hormuz will stay closed until 2029, the end of Trump's term, unless Trump accepts all of Iran's demands, per a senior Iranian source and Majid Shakeri, advisor to Parliament Speaker Ghalibaf. Iran's demands in the US surrender document remain unchanged, $300 billion in compensation, the release of up to $100 billion in frozen assets, lifting all sanctions, US troop withdrawal from the entire region, an end to the naval blockade, and accepting transit fees on every ship.

    19K3.5K6997322.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026273x their median

    “Not only is the Universe stranger than we think, it is stranger than we can think.” — Werner Heisenberg https://t.co/agu2O1zIw7

    13K2.5K15196399K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026124x their median

    🚨 WATCH: Andy Burnham builds an electrical circuit to show he’s a “circuit-breaker” in British politics https://t.co/2zCbWaKVX9

    5.1K2291.5K5154.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026115x their median

    BREAKING: Yemen's Houthis have just struck the Saudi Aramco Berri Gas Plant in Al Jubail, Saudi Arabia, one of the largest gas processing facilities in the country. NASA FIRMS Satellite imagery also shows a massive fire burning at the site. This is the first attack on Saudi Arabia energy facilities roughly 2 weeks.

    5.2K1.2K175196710K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026115x their median

    “The world has changed. Elon is not alone. Those of us who fight for freedom are no longer alone. We are millions.” — Javier Milei, The President of Argentina https://t.co/roSL5HeOmF

    5.7K8132492884K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202695x their median

    Discarded wind turbine blades in Sweetwater, Texas. Not exactly environmentally sustainable. https://t.co/Vhl4egmc7G

    3.8K1.5K192115142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202687x their median

    China created a system that simulates the earth with billions of AI agents that has real personality, memory, beliefs and human-like desires. it gives them a terrifying ability to predict the future. they published a paper called "Modeling Earth-Scale Human-Like Societies with One Billion Agents." they built "Light Society," a framework that efficiently models human-like societies powered by large language models. traditional agent-based models were always limited by simple, predictable behaviors. but this new earth-scale simulation framework uses a "mixture-of-models" engine to change everything. by combining massive llms with smaller, highly efficient distilled surrogates, the researchers successfully simulated a society of over one billion autonomous agents. they grounded these agents using real-world demographic data from the world values survey. these agents don't just act like generic bots.. they exhibit sophisticated social behaviors that mimic actual, diverse human populations. they ran simulations on trust games and massive opinion diffusion, tracking how information spreads and how society evolves in real-time. the simulation proved to have incredibly high fidelity in modeling diverse social phenomena, giving researchers a practical foundation for hypothesis testing. think about what this means for predicting global elections, market crashes, or how a population will react to a crisis.. you don't need to poll people or guess anymore. you just run the simulation. the infrastructure for agentic simulation is scaling faster than anyone realized. social sciences and predictive modeling will literally never be the same..

    3.8K801273240360K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202683x their median

    Mark Zuckerberg is laying out a sweeping vision for AI: a personal superintelligence available 24/7 to everyone. Zuckerberg says these AI agents could eventually help people across nearly every part of life, including work, learning, relationships, and mental health, as Meta releases its new open-weight "Muse Glimmer" model and pushes to make advanced AI more widely accessible. At the same time, Meta is investing in the people and communities behind that future, including America’s Workforce Academy and a $1 billion community fund tied to its growing data-center footprint. His message is simple: "The future is for everyone."

    3.2K641901196916K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202675x their median

    The CIA can remotely take over your car and drive it into a bridge at 140 mph. That’s just one of the revelations from the 2017 Vault 7 leaks, according to former CIA officer John Kiriakou. A disgruntled CIA engineer allegedly dumped thousands of pages of the agency’s most advanced hacking tools to WikiLeaks. The documents showed the CIA had developed ways to: - Hack your car’s computer and seize control - Turn your “off” smart TV into a live microphone - And much more that makes the old MKUltra programs look primitive. Kiriakou says it’s terrifying what the agency is now technologically capable of.

    3.4K85511673464K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 826K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.175% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 612x its own typical post.

What is David Icke's engagement rate on X?
David Icke (@davidicke) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 825,963 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, David Icke sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @davidicke have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @davidicke post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going