Back to @davidaxelrod's profile

David Axelrod engagement report

@davidaxelrod - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.074%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
1.39%
75K views on a typical post
Reach
5.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.83/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #s.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Axelrod's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.074%, David Axelrod sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.432%
p902.10%
p99161.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,378 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.432%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile161.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202646x their median

    I’ll never steal your pen.

    62K6.5K1.8K2261.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202639x their median

    CNN issued a statement condemning Trump after he attacked and berated CNN reporter Kristen Holmes in the Oval Office https://t.co/GKOwUStZyB

    34K5.5K8002481.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202634x their median

    The Justice Department is admitting that a $14 million renovation on the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool in Washington, DC, was flawed, and is dropping the criminal case against a former Olympian that accused him of damaging the pool, according to a new court filing. https://t.co/ZvFnQUocq4

    26K5.9K1.9K1.3K2.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202632x their median

    I love Michigan and am so proud to have put up my hand to serve. I spoke with Abdul a few moments ago to offer him my full support as we work to defeat Mike Rogers this November. Thank you, Michigan. https://t.co/xVnIAFBqLl

    27K2.0K3.9K7314.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202617x their median

    Trump just lost it in the Oval Office, yelling at a female reporter: Quiet! quiet! Fake News. You’re a loud, boisterous person. You’re fake news. Be quiet. You’re a fake reporter. https://t.co/chXzMMXTGK

    13K2.2K1.7K5483.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202614x their median

    There was plenty senators could have asked Dr. Fauci about what lessons he learned, and the country should, from the COVID pandemic. Instead they engaged in an obvious attempt to demonize and entrap the 85-year-old, who received the Medal of Freedom from a Republican POTUS for the work he did to save millions here and abroad from the AIDS epidemic. This was not about public health. It was about one senators longstanding vendetta.

    9.1K1.6K4.0K2421.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202613x their median

    Ossoff: When you step back and consider it, the situation is absurd. Tech titans dig bunkers and warn us the new intelligence they’re training could lead to mass joblessness or human extinction, while our Congress debates ballrooms and youth sports. We’ve amassed enough firepower to end the world 1,000 times over, but we can’t summon the will to guarantee health care and pre-K. I say all this to say, but it’s the crushing weakness of our politics, against the unmet needs of our people and the massive stakes of our times, that’s shaking our faith in the future. But Atlanta, I refuse to leave my girls a world as dark and dangerous and cruel as this one threatens to become. When Eva is old enough to ask me why I let this happen. I'm determined to answer truthfully, that I didn’t

    11K2.3K107148453K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202611x their median

    Please don't overreact to Roberts Court decision on the contemplated USPS ballot moves They simply held that the injunction came too early, before a final rule👇 Now we HAVE a final rule & we will litigate it. I'm as confident in our arguments here as in any of our cases! https://t.co/DVV6f2qLQD

    8.7K2.6K351160748K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.6x their median

    My dad and his family were driven from their home by violent, lawless mobs during the pogroms. Jews can't look the other way when violent, lawless mobs are driving innocent Palestinians from their homes on the West Bank. https://t.co/5SNhJgZ1Gq

    5.9K1.5K41895236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20267.4x their median

    Q: "Within 24 hours you got behind [El-Sayed's] campaign…Why would you do that?" Haley Stevens: "That's called democracy, friend, right? You don't sign up for a Democratic Party to be salty grapes and just continue to hold a grudge. We have seen that play out. No shots here but we've seen that play out with out current president. Some might say Mr. Sanders pursued that approach as well when he didn't win a Democratic nomination."

    6.7K5432091761.6M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#s

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.074%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 75K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video and 48% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is David Axelrod's engagement rate on X?
David Axelrod (@davidaxelrod) has an engagement rate of 0.074%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,394,363 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.074%, David Axelrod sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,378 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @davidaxelrod have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @davidaxelrod post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going