Back to @daveatherton's profile

David Atherton engagement report

@daveatherton - 347K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.288%
of 347K followers
Per impression
1.42%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
20.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.67/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.288%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.

Compared with accounts its own size

David Atherton's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.288%, David Atherton sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 346 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202631x their median

    🚨BREAKING: Muslims are furious after Denmark's Minister of Immigration banned the Islamic call to prayer! https://t.co/QAEphafas2

    27K3.0K610191234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.8x their median

    A man dressed as a woman tested how safe Birmingham streets are... https://t.co/aJAvSXYjH5

    4.8K6773144095K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.0x their median

    What’s your response? https://t.co/YnCWjz49rl

    2.9K2001.8K9686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.8x their median

    🚨🚨 FREE SPEECH UNION AND BIG BROTHER WATCH VICTORY! The FSU has joined forces with @BigBrotherWatch (BBW) to back two people arrested for holding signs that read “f*** Islam” at the Unite the Kingdom march in May. The pair were being investigated for potential breaches of the Public Order Act, with possible religious aggravation. We received news today that the case against one of the individuals has been dropped following representations made by the FSU and BBW. In a joint legal letter to the Crown Prosecution Service and the Metropolitan Police, we urged them to drop the case — pointing out that Britain does not have blasphemy laws and that it is not an offence to express hostility towards any religion. We also cited the case of Hamit Coskun, who was accused of threatening public order after he burnt a copy of the Quran outside the Turkish consulate in London in peaceful protest against what he called the Islamification of his home country, Turkey. The judgment made it very clear that the law distinguishes between the right to express hostility towards a religion and hatred towards people because of their religion. As Mr Justice Bennathan said: “The right to freedom of expression, if it is a right worth having, must include the right to express views that offend, shock or disturb.” The UK is in the midst of a free speech crisis. We cannot allow the Government and the police to revive our censorious blasphemy laws — for Islam alone. The misuse of public order legislation must stop. It is having a chilling effect on our right to free speech, our right to protest and our right to criticise ANY religion.

    3.9K8196030248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.5x their median

    If you want to see the utter hypocrisy of the political & media class in the UK just compare their reaction to Notting Hill Carnival and Unite the Kingdom. Me on GB News https://t.co/tvb3uqOLK0

    3.6K751721895K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.3x their median

    A man harassing children near a park is dealt with. https://t.co/NkLcSjKnmH

    2.8K28018737184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    GMB presenter @aditray_ is complaining about people criticising women's head coverings, comparing it to the dress of Catholic nuns. I see Muslim head garb as a sign of female subjugation. I'm not aware of any Catholic schools who insist girls come to school dressed as nuns. https://t.co/NRA1B5uES9

    1.2K16332512K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 2026

    🚨Lawfare Update🚨 Thinking I was going to be in court, it was just a hearing & they found against me. I have instantly appealed. I'd be very grateful if you could help me towards my legal costs. Defending freedom of speech & obtaining justice is not cheap. Thank you. https://t.co/KtUHfo25CM

    48918311110236K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    🚨 Five people have been charged following the death of a newborn baby girl in Sheffield - Andrea Skopova, aged 20, formerly of Robey Street, Sheffield - Peter Horvath, aged 19, of Holywell Heights, Sheffield - Nina Horvathova, aged 37, of Holywell Heights, Sheffield - Peter Horvath, aged 38, of Holywell Heights, Sheffield A 15-year-old girl, who can't be named for legal reasons, has also been charged with perverting the course of justice On Sunday (30 August) police responded to reports of a concern for the safety of a newborn baby in the Wincobank area of Sheffield A property on Holywell Heights was searched by officers and the baby was located Sadly, despite the best efforts of emergency services, the baby girl was pronounced dead at the scene. A forensic post-mortem has since confirmed that she died as a result of stab wounds All five have been remanded into custody ahead of appearing at Sheffield Magistrates' Court later today Two women, aged 26 and 37, who were arrested on suspicion of murder remain on bail

    422128611055K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    #BREAKING Argentine President Javier Milei is set to address Argentina’s “historic claim” to the Falkland Islands in a national broadcast on Thursday night. https://t.co/ZgdzEaaQBT

    285292613148K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 347K followers, an engagement rate of 0.288%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

What is David Atherton's engagement rate on X?
David Atherton (@daveatherton) has an engagement rate of 0.288%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 347,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.288%, David Atherton sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @daveatherton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @daveatherton post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going