Back to @datafdn's profile

The DATA Foundation engagement report

@datafdn - 554K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 554K followers
Per impression
0.896%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
3.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
157
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 554K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.896% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 46% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 397 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

The DATA Foundation's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, The DATA Foundation sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 20262.5x their median

    Over 100 million registrations in less than 30 days of launch. That's 100+ million permanent legal receipts for AI training data created on Trace. So far: ▸ 105M registrations ▸ 171k contributors ▸ 170 TB of data audited ▸ $57k chain fees https://t.co/paAPvaOdS6

    247211052491K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.3x their median

    The DATA Network has just received clearance to onboard audit receipts for over 500,000 hours of video content spanning 30,000 pieces of entertainment, including Bugs Bunny, Woody Woodpecker, Tennessee Tuxedo, Tom & Jerry, The Pink Panther, Popeye, The Twilight Zone, Garfield, and thousands of other classics. Kled is onboarding this content to Trace so its ownership, provenance, licensing rights, and usage history can be independently verified before it is sold to AI labs. This is the future of the AI data market. The world’s most valuable IP will increasingly require permanent, transparent audit trails before it can be licensed for AI training, and those records will live on the DATA Network.

    2743944550K viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 20261.9x their median

    500,000 Users. Onward. https://t.co/lRwP0l76VA

    2143538943K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.8x their median

    https://t.co/6C2yOW5ObX

    16623812047K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    We passed 150M registrations in just over a month. Each represents a permanent audit receipt for AI training data on Trace. Raw numbers: ▸ 151.7M registrations ▸ 359K contributors ▸ 224 TB of data audited ▸ $105K in fees in 30d We’re dedicating the next month to scaling our system to handle the next 150M uploads.

    1601421118K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    The global AI training dataset market is projected to grow from $7.5B in 2026 to $52.4B by 2035. And as AI scales, trusted data becomes essential infrastructure. @blockworksres goes deep on the case for DATA Network and our role in the emerging AI data economy ↓ https://t.co/AvKH0UyszX

    1061754721K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026

    New favorite pastime: watching registrations stream in live on Trace. https://t.co/siCz59Xn8N

    982643319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    The DATA Network is onboarding audit receipts for hundreds of broadcast programs from Maryland Public Television, one of the largest statewide networks in the PBS family. For more than 50 years, MPT has produced award-winning programming across science, nature, crime, history, education, and local storytelling, earning 211 Capital Emmy Awards alongside multiple national Emmys. This marks another major catalog being brought into the transparent AI data economy through the DATA Network x @useKled partnership. As the catalog's exclusive AI licensing partner, Kled is onboarding it to Trace, where its provenance, licensing permissions, and usage history can be independently verified before it is licensed to AI labs. We're entering an era where governments, public institutions, and major media organizations are licensing their archives to AI companies. Transparent proof of authorization will become increasingly important, and those records will live on the DATA Network.

    1351117215K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    One of Korea's largest exchanges is spotlighting $DATA @Official_Upbit is running a 4-day event featuring the token powering the DATA Network. Tap in ↓ https://t.co/NS45azoiBo

    1101336532K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 2026

    In today's AI landscape, every dataset must pass three critical questions: • Can you source it at scale? • Can you prove where it came from? • Can you trust its quality? DATA Network is built to answer all three. https://t.co/veJwBtM3Uz

    1061438520K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 157 interactions against 554K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.896% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 46% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 397 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

What is The DATA Foundation's engagement rate on X?
The DATA Foundation (@datafdn) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 553,743 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, The DATA Foundation sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @datafdn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @datafdn post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going