Back to @darrentill2's profile

DT engagement report

@darrentill2 - 471K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 471K followers
Per impression
0.319%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
6.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
93
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #ufcsacramento.

Compared with accounts its own size

DT's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, DT sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202620x their median

    Imagine Ian Garry wins… which he is more than capable of doing. We going to have to put up with him even more. FML 😭

    1.7K25692157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202618x their median

    Islam Makhachev says he’s NOT surprised everyone dislikes Ian Garry “No one like Ian Garry, me also” via @ufc https://t.co/3Jg7oH94QL

    1.7K33186529K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.1x their median

    unfollowing everyone today who tweets “big week” every monday

    39541601154K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.0x their median

    Drop your Solana wallet address... Crediting 5 players tomorrow to play Pragmatic's latest release, SunnyDaze Asylum. 💊 Must be following @BlockBetGG Must have a BlockBet ID Must 💙 + 🔄 Join: https://t.co/oERfNrBAEk 🌐 https://t.co/HOUORAS08x

    1198179117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.9x their median

    Yeah… https://t.co/cwqVpWGJvI

    25177158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    PICKS FOR TONIGHT! @BlockBetGG Another pretty shitty card but do think they’ll be loads of knockouts. Main event wise, even though Garry is a very very good fighter can’t see past Islam by sub. Abdul Malik by TKO is the main 🔒 https://t.co/w4zGy8Bx0q

    88510131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    HYPED to welcome @BlockBetGG to Verifluence🤝 Rewards store where players earn coins for real world prizes, UFC memorabilia, event tickets, experiences. Your own promo page, social features and a race budget for your chat. This is not a standard casino deal. Apply on Verifluence now.

    442215117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    The Premier League is back and 10 new missions just landed, across Europe's top five leagues. 👑 Clear all 10 and that's 150,000+ Store Coins earned. Spend them on free spins, free bets and real-world items. 🤝 Opt in now: https://t.co/oERfNrBAEk ⚽ https://t.co/uVksyG8NnW

    281811113K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    Three new missions just landed. 😮‍💨 Complete them all before the Premier League season starts to earn $750 in Free Bets. 💰 Opt in and start earning: https://t.co/oERfNrBAEk 🤝 https://t.co/mzuHWvJaQP

    25138113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    A thing of beauty arrived today. Thanks to @BlockBetGG store points I grabbed the new @LUFC away shirt. The @BlockBetGG team are goats https://t.co/23BW0EMIBJ

    24713212K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ufcsacramento

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 93 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.319% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.20% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 20x its own typical post.

What is DT's engagement rate on X?
DT (@darrentill2) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 470,843 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, DT sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @darrentill2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @darrentill2 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going