Back to @danwootton's profile

Dan Wootton engagement report

@danwootton - 672K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.729%
of 672K followers
Per impression
2.51%
195K views on a typical post
Reach
29.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.042%
81 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 672K followers, an engagement rate of 0.729%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 195K times each, and 2.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #nottinghillcarnival.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dan Wootton's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.729%, Dan Wootton sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 20246.3x their median

    🚨”IF THIS IS TRUE” - I am Bernadette Spofforth… you know me as Bernie. And this is the story of how the State silenced an ordinary citizen, through arrest and bail conditions, to ensure only State truth was heard. With special thanks to @sdavieslaw @speechUnion https://t.co/p7ouXnl6qR

    20K7.5K2.1K9532.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    WE ARE BROKE. Ukraine's Zelenskyy government is proving it's more corrupt by the day. Yet our new PM Burnham has just turned up in Kyiv wearing a dodgy polo shirt grinning like a Cheshire cat signing another blank cheque to keep this ludicrous war going. God help us... https://t.co/lEyhlx3Fx0

    8.0K1.5K76849123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20261.6x their median

    OUTSPOKEN EXCLUSIVE Counter terrorism police investigating the murder of Ann Widdecombe have reopened an investigation into the firebombing of Nigel Farage's home last year. It raises the terrifying possibility that Ann's alleged killer may have targeted the Reform UK leader first. Farage needs full government security as a priority matter. The MSM should be reporting this story.

    6.0K1.6K20746625K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.5x their median

    In a sign Burnham has totally lost the plot after only 6 weeks as PM , the Guardian says he will tell the Commons the only way for the UK to grow the economy is for more state control. Appalling that our skint nation has this Northern nutcase carrying out a Socialist experiment which, as he will already know from history, is doomed to failure. The good news is that his state grab guarantees he will be thrown out in ‘29.

    6.3K94121332241K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    Prince Harry's entire world is collapsing. He's now OUT at African Parks, the charity he led amid accusations of the most despicable human rights abuses. The UK doesn't need this man. We certainly don't need to be paying for this man, as 98 per cent of the British public agree. https://t.co/gznYvpjsFE

    5.9K62026532134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    🚨 NEW: David Lammy gave Andy Burnham the phone number of the imposter who pretended to be the Donald Trump’s Chief of Staff Source: “It is a serious embarrassment for David” [@kateferguson4]

    5.6K354255151503K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    In case you missed my take on the Harry and Meghan debacle. We don’t want them back. 👇 The Sussexes’ selfish return spells peril for the Royal family https://t.co/sKA311mKb9

    2.7K29141728334K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Matt Goodwin @GoodwinMJ posted this. Thank you for your support 🙏🏻 I wonder whether you would speak to your colleagues at GBNews and ask them to start supporting @pinkladies_uk once again? You were such fantastic advocates of ours and covered every protest from the start in Epping last year @Alexarmstrong @CDP1882 @MartinDaubney but as soon as I moved to @RestoreBritain from @reformparty_uk that support completely STOPPED? I understand why but surely stopping the RAPE and Abuse of our Women and Children is more important than political allegiance. Surely it’s about supporting British Mothers and what we stand for ? The Pink Ladies are all individuals with individual political affiliation and that is absolutely welcomed because the safety of our Women and Girls is a basic HUMAN RIGHT not about political point scoring. Our overriding issue and only goal is to STOP the Rape Epidemic we are in the midst of - THAT should be shared by everyone from the Right to the Left of Politics. Considering how absolutely awful the situation is becoming.. SURELY @GBNEWS should once again support our mission and efforts and help us with our fight against the evil that is consuming our nation! You are after all.. The Peoples Channel ! 🇬🇧🇬🇧

    1.2K338391390K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Lily Phillips reveals that the time she responded to Bonnie blue about sleeping with 1,057 men in 12 hours and she responded she slept with 1,113 men in 12 hours was actually true. “But I did it differently to how I did the hundred” https://t.co/qdtqRr2i1i

    1.4K3980395.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Can you imagine the stink if anyone other than an ultra woke rebranded bbc host made a gaffe like this. https://t.co/vFwXtQZ9cF

    1.4K121387149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nottinghillcarnival

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.9K interactions against 672K followers, an engagement rate of 0.729%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 195K times each, and 2.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

What is Dan Wootton's engagement rate on X?
Dan Wootton (@danwootton) has an engagement rate of 0.729%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 672,071 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.729%, Dan Wootton sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danwootton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danwootton post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going