Danny Kanell engagement report
@dannykanell - 363K followers on X
Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 709 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 0.919% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfbpregame, #dktop12, #cover3locks.
Measured over 63 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #cfbpregame, #dktop12, #cover3locks.
Compared with accounts its own size
Danny Kanell's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.195%, Danny Kanell sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 46% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 121 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 26, 202635x their median
What a shot. https://t.co/FRWzUorwBQ
- Sep 6, 202623x their median
I'm sorry but you absolutely cannot be storming the field after barely beating Western Michigan as a 4 touchdown favorite. Embarrassing
- Sep 6, 202617x their median
Wasn't aware Connor Stallions is the new clock operator in Ann Arbor
- Sep 6, 20269.9x their median
I'm so glad we have instant review in college football. It allows more time to get calls wrong instead of just getting it over with quickly
- Sep 27, 20267.7x their median
This AP Top 25 might be the dumbest that I’ve seen.
- Sep 12, 20267.3x their median
Drew Mestemaker just outplayed Dante Moore. Dante Moore was a 5 star out of high school. Drew Mestemaker didn’t get any stars because he was a backup QB in high school who never played. Don’t ever give up on your dreams! What a story.
- Sep 7, 20266.9x their median
I don’t care what you were ranked before the weekend. Or the preseason. Who has been the best on the field. Against the best. Pure and simple. #DKtop12 1. LSU 2. Ole Miss 3. Miami 4. USC 5. Notre Dame 6. Indiana 7. Oregon 8. Auburn 9. Ohio State 10. Bama 11. Texas 12. Georgia
- Oct 3, 20266.0x their median
So I guess Florida isn’t 2019 LSU??
- Sep 26, 20265.6x their median
I have no problem with Texas being ranked #1. They've earned it. But does anyone think Texas is the best team in college football???
- Sep 7, 20265.1x their median
Pretty surreal scene in Tally. True story: our hotel in town was without power from 1:30am-7:30am. Apparently some college kid was speeding and lost control and hit a substation that caused it. No idea if it’s connected but sure seems to be https://t.co/r6xr2uW97z
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 709 interactions against 363K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 63 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 0.919% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 63 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 35x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cfbpregame, #dktop12, #cover3locks.
- What is Danny Kanell's engagement rate on X?
- Danny Kanell (@dannykanell) has an engagement rate of 0.195%, based on the median interactions across 63 original posts from the last 30 days against 363,197 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.195%, Danny Kanell sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @dannykanell have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @dannykanell post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.8 posts per day across the measured window.