Back to @dannychoo's profile

Danny Choo engagement report

@dannychoo - 80K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.154%
of 80K followers
Per impression
1.35%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
11.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
123
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #smartdoll.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.154%, Danny Choo sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 742 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 26, 20242.7x their median

    Cortex 2 updates ;-) https://t.co/Fw5BTbJdoV https://t.co/YuZDlx2MkI

    2842715222K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 20251.8x their median

    Smart Doll Cortex 2 can now be equipped with an AI conversational #M5Stack module, allowing them to speak both English and Chinese. Thanks to their magnetic modular design, all components fit seamlessly inside the body—something not possible with the vinyl version. This Xiao Zhi powered model also features an optional screen that displays readable replies and emoji-based expressions, enhancing interactions with visual feedback. Smart Doll’s quirky responses to misheard inputs often lead to unexpected lols. At first, their replies are unpredictable, adding to their charm and making conversations feel organic and fun. However, they become more accurate over time as they learn from interactions. The AI models powering Smart Doll are trained in Natural Language Understanding, enabling them to grasp context, intent, and nuances in user input for more meaningful responses. They also support context retention across multiple conversation turns, allowing for smooth and continuous dialogue. They adapt and refine their responses as they engage in more conversations, making interactions feel increasingly natural and personalized. We will provide tutorials and #3Dprinting files so folks can build their modules and install AI models such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Qwen2.5 72B, etc. This way, owners can tweak their Smart Doll’s voice, accent, and personality to reflect their creativity, ideals, and identity. With the advancement of open-source offline LLMs, local processing ensures your Smart Doll can safeguard the secrets you share—keeping them safe from Skynet. We are also working on integrating robotics and hardware control to broaden the application of #smartdoll as a truly useful companion (instead of just sitting around asking you for more apparel) that can interact with their environment, assist with everyday tasks, and adapt to their owner’s needs—whether that means offering companionship, controlling smart home devices, or even detecting environmental changes for safety. If you’re Team John Connor, no worries! AI components are entirely optional—whether you choose to go DIY or skip them altogether, the decision is yours. At least until Skynet has other plans.

    188424217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    As mentioned the other day, we are exhibiting at the World Design Cities Conference (WDCC) 2026 in Shanghai, taking place from tomorrow until the 30th Sep. Co-hosted by UNESCO and the Shanghai Municipal People's Government, WDCC brings together designers, creators and organizations from cities around the world to explore how design, technology and innovation can shape the way we live, work and interact with the world around us. More nitty gritty, photos and videos on the site. https://t.co/ExqKiflMmy 明日から9月30日まで上海で開催される World Design Cities Conference(WDCC)2026 に、Smart Dollを展示します。 WDCCは、UNESCOと上海市人民政府が共同主催する国際的なデザインイベントです。世界各地からデザイナー、クリエイター、企業や団体が集まり、デザイン、テクノロジー、イノベーションを通じて、私たちの暮らしや働き方、そして社会との関わり方をどのようにより良くしていけるかを考えます。 #smartdoll

    1092849.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    60cm Robot New Skill Unlocked: Moving Eyes! 🤖👀 From movement to interaction, we’re making it more lifelike with every upgrade. ✨ #robots #robot #humanoid #figurobot https://t.co/Qeb1DFGocB

    293118.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#smartdoll

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.154%. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 328 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Danny Choo's engagement rate on X?
Danny Choo (@dannychoo) has an engagement rate of 0.154%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 79,679 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.154%, Danny Choo sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dannychoo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @dannychoo post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going