Back to @danielverlaan's profile

Daniël Verlaan engagement report

@danielverlaan - 74K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.215%
of 74K followers
Per impression
0.377%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
56.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
160
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.215%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.377% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniël Verlaan's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.215%, Daniël Verlaan sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 6, 202023x their median

    Ik mag het eindelijk zeggen 📕🚀 'Ik weet je wachtwoord', mijn boek over de duistere kant van het internet, komt deze maand uit! Over hackers, malware & het dark web. En wat je moet doen als je webcam opeens suck my dick tegen je zegt. Te bestellen via: https://t.co/2ZT4Vp9P5p https://t.co/uORQVgfyjb

    1.4K13517246View on X
  • Jan 13, 202617x their median

    De NS-app lag er vorige week tijdens het winterweer uit omdat de NS dacht dat het digitaal werd aangevallen (DDoS-aanval) - de app werd uit voorzorg offline gehaald. Wat bleek: de app werd tientallen miljoenen keren gebruikt, maar door 'echte' mensen. https://t.co/g91QyDIkmD

    1.1K131641671K viewsView on X
  • Feb 12, 202616x their median

    nieuws: Odido Nederland is gehackt en de privégegevens van 6,2 miljoen klanten zijn gestolen. Het gaat onder andere om namen, woonadressen, telefoonnummers, geboortedata, IBAN's en paspoort- en rijbewijsnummers. https://t.co/p4Vrbbj8Hy

    61524922063172K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 202612x their median

    nieuws: Door een hack bij Ajax is het mogelijk om seizoenskaarten te stelen en stadionverboden in te zien en op te heffen. Ik nam de proef om de som en zette de kaart van Ajax-directeur Geelen op mijn account, en kreeg zo toegang tot de VIP-bestuursbox. https://t.co/8gQ2Vg5hjZ

    729877236255K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 202610x their median

    Opgepast: een nepwebsite belooft compensatie voor slachtoffers van het Odido-datalek. De site odidoschadevergoeding[.]nl ziet er gelikt uit. De oplichters zitten in Malta en vragen 50 euro te betalen voor een claim die natuurlijk nooit wordt ingediend. https://t.co/pyuJ7hKb04 https://t.co/V5bc5NpJIk

    439284281060K viewsView on X
  • Feb 26, 20268.2x their median

    nieuws: De cybercriminele groep Shinyhunters heeft een deel van de gestolen Odido-gegevens gepubliceerd op het darkweb. In het datalek zijn veel financiële gegevens te vinden van klanten en oud-klanten die al jaren geen abonnement meer hebben bij Odido. https://t.co/pVb0jL9Be9

    3651229226210K viewsView on X
  • Feb 17, 20266.8x their median

    De nepmails van Infomedics zijn, in tegenstelling tot wat sommige media beweren, makkelijk te herkennen. > Verzender is niet [email protected] > Betaalverzoek gaat niet naar https://t.co/o1TKOBAqAb Phishing herkennen is gewoon te leren, angst zaaien is alleen makkelijker.

    3738442441K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20265.6x their median

    Gemeente Epe is gehackt en de privégegevens en bsn's van vrijwel alle inwoners zijn gestolen. Ook zijn van 1000 inwoners hun id-bewijs gestolen. De hack gebeurde met ClickFix, een nieuwe aanvalstechniek die mensen verleidt malafide code uit te voeren. https://t.co/klJq5zY818

    244125301925K viewsView on X
  • Feb 23, 20265.4x their median

    nieuws: De groep Shinyhunters is verantwoordelijk voor de hack bij Odido. De cybercriminelen dreigen de gestolen data te publiceren als er niet wordt betaald. "Dit is jullie laatste waarschuwing, anders lekken we de data." https://t.co/Zi51GEq465

    2609142961K viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 20264.7x their median

    Het Nederlandse bedrijf Chipsoft, dat software voor patiëntendossiers en andere digitale systemen voor ziekenhuizen bouwt, is gehackt en slachtoffer van ransomware. Door de hack hebben verschillende ziekenhuizen hun systemen offline gehaald. https://t.co/izmqIfZd37

    194112221724K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 160 interactions against 74K followers, an engagement rate of 0.215%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.377% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 56.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video, 17% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Daniël Verlaan's engagement rate on X?
Daniël Verlaan (@danielverlaan) has an engagement rate of 0.215%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 74,250 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.215%, Daniël Verlaan sits above the 50th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danielverlaan have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danielverlaan post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going