Back to @danielsgoldman's profile

Daniel Goldman engagement report

@danielsgoldman - 517K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.328%
of 517K followers
Per impression
0.42%
403K views on a typical post
Reach
77.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 517K followers, an engagement rate of 0.328%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 403K times each, and 0.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel Goldman's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.328%, Daniel Goldman sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 10, 20266.7x their median

    🚨BREAKING: President Donald Trump Thursday dismissed all remaining commissioners on the Election Assistance Commission (EAC), a bipartisan federal agency created to help states administer elections. https://t.co/0J0GFywIdb

    6.4K3.9K632392964K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.8x their median

    If you were a supporter of the Uncommitted movement — which was significantly responsible for Trump 2.0 — then you are in no position to demand anything from Democrats.

    3.5K6381.7K5291.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.7x their median

    If Blanche and Trump are unwilling to formally undo the outrageous slush fund and tax immunity for Trump and J6 cop beaters, just imagine what else they will do once Blanche is confirmed. Actually, given his record already, I can’t even imagine how destructive Blanche will be.

    4.8K1.3K1912454K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.5x their median

    My team and I have met with committee members and Senators over the past several weeks and addressed any concerns or outstanding questions. We have enjoyed good faith discussions, and as a result issue the following order and update with regard to the May IRS settlement. The Department always welcomes and appreciates productive engagement with all members of Congress.

    2.4K5731.1K1671.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 2026

    For 250 years, America has been a refuge for those fleeing oppression, persecution, and poverty. We must continue to fight to ensure that everyone has the social safety net they need to pursue the American Dream. Thank you to everyone in NY-10, and congratulations to @bradlander. Happy 4th of July!

    1.6K2184482558K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    I know how to take on Donald Trump because I did it when I was lead counsel during his first impeachment. I’m ready to lead that charge to hold him accountable while also passing a bold, progressive agenda that helps every New Yorker can thrive. Let’s get this done. Tomorrow’s the day, polls open at 6AM and close at 9PM. Find yours here: https://t.co/79O5sfRlWU

    9882726673640K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    BREAKING: A Senate committee votes to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress over his refusal to answer questions at COVID hearing. https://t.co/grp8XrxSAk

    1.1K235344142644K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Sen @BillCassidy has already been through one Trump cabinet nomination where promises made to him to get his vote were quickly broken (RFK Jr.). Despite being the deciding vote to confirm his HHS nominee, Trump nonetheless endorsed against Cassidy, who lost in his primary. More than anyone, Cassidy knows Trump’s nominees’ promises are worthless. And he owes Trump nothing. Do the right thing for the DOJ, Bill. Vote no on Blanche.

    1.2K2441311444K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    What happened with Poetica Coffee this weekend does not reflect the New York City I know and love. We’re better than that. In difficult times like these, we must come together and fight for the future we all deserve. https://t.co/6UG7yo814k

    8981484444857K viewsView on X
  • Jun 23, 2026

    “[Dan Goldman] is a fighter for working men and women of his district. We need Dan Goldman.” Thank you @KathyHochul for the kind words of support. And to the 31 NYCHA TA presidents, 20 labor unions, and community leaders in Chinatown, the LES, Sunset Park and Red Hook who are supporting this campaign. New Yorkers, tomorrow is the big day - make sure you have a plan to vote so we can keep delivering results for the working class and immigrant communities that are the backbone of our city. Head to https://t.co/79O5sfRlWU to make a plan to vote. Every vote matters!

    9742312691532K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 517K followers, an engagement rate of 0.328%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 403K times each, and 0.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 77.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 6.7x its own typical post.

What is Daniel Goldman's engagement rate on X?
Daniel Goldman (@danielsgoldman) has an engagement rate of 0.328%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 516,804 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.328%, Daniel Goldman sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danielsgoldman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danielsgoldman post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going