Back to @danielefecto's profile

Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo engagement report

@danielefecto - 86K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.014%
of 86K followers
Per impression
0.872%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.872% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 326x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hatebreed, #lisacerati, #marilynmanson.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #hatebreed, #lisacerati, #marilynmanson.

Compared with accounts its own size

Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,758 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video87% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 87% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026326x their median

    EGO está nominada al Latin GRAMMY por Mejor Canción de Rock! ❤️‍🔥 Qué orgullo y qué honor recibir esta nominación. Gracias a todos los miembros de la Academia que votaron por EGO, a todas las personas que hicieron posible esta canción y a quienes han escuchado, cantado y hecho suya esta canción. Nos hace muy felices ver nuestra música seguir llegando cada vez más lejos 🇲🇽 Nos vemos en los Latin GRAMMYs! 🤘🏻

    3.2K576835636K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026197x their median

    TODO ESTÁ CONECTADO. https://t.co/BLNUaTNXtu

    2.1K131836599K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026127x their median

    New Song "Oi AG!" Release 🎆 https://t.co/cPtsimGeFD 📹 Live Video out now 🌴▶️ (Live at Zipangu LA 2026.05.16) https://t.co/Qcz9NTFHOt https://t.co/24JL4Thpt8

    1.3K179151685K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202632x their median

    Qué fuerte ver que se cancele un festival como Vivo X El Rock. Para mí, era nuestro Lollapalooza. Un festival que logró convertirse en parte de nuestra historia y que, durante años, nos permitió ver en un mismo lugar a artistas que quizás nunca imaginamos tener en Lima. Ojalá esto no sea un punto final y puedan volver en un futuro no muy lejano. Y, por supuesto, espero que la situación de todas las personas que compraron sus entradas pueda resolverse de manera clara y lo antes posible.

    3152104692K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202630x their median

    ✨ ¿Me extrañaron? ✨ Nos vemos el 19, 20 y 21 de marzo. https://t.co/4Umm1GXeFt

    323231036.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202624x their median

    Toda mi comprensión y empatía con las personas que tenían una entrada para ver a Robbie Williams esta noche. En quienes esperaron meses, hicieron planes, viajaron y tenían la ilusión de ver en vivo al artista británico. Ojalá, en medio de todo lo que está pasando, se pueda encontrar una solución pensando primero en las personas que compraron una entrada y que simplemente querían disfrutar de un concierto.

    26328015.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202618x their median

    Por fin esta semana se dio el concierto de aespa en Lima, sí que lo esperé. Tenía fe en que aquí tocaran "Drama", pero no sucedió. La pasé increíble y tuvimos la suerte de verlas en un venue que hizo que el show sea casi íntimo, parte de su crecimiento en el público local. Espero verlas nuevamente en su próxima gira.

    18325404.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202616x their median

    Soy fiel creyente de que la experiencia positiva de un concierto va mucho más allá de lo que sucede sobre el escenario. Empieza desde que salimos de casa y termina cuando finalmente regresamos a ella. Por eso, cuesta entender el desorden que se genera en los ingresos y salidas de algunos eventos. Y esto va más allá de la gente: es un tema que involucra a la organización y también a las autoridades. No es posible que te cobren S/50 por estacionar un vehículo y que, al momento de salir, termines prácticamente como rehén, sin poder movilizarte durante largos minutos. Menos aún que se cierren los accesos a distintas subidas de la Costa Verde, complicando todavía más la salida. Ni qué decir de los vendedores ambulantes que terminan obstaculizando el paso en zonas donde ya existe una gran concentración de personas. Quiero creer que estos son errores de los que se puede aprender y que se tomarán medidas para mejorar, sobre todo pensando en los conciertos masivos que vienen en camino.

    16821047.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202613x their median

    Wow, qué mañana hemos tenido. Foo Fighters en Lima, precios super accesibles, un país que sigue firme en convertirse en plaza obligatoria de las giras más grandes y gente con ganas de vivir los shows más increíbles. 🫶🏻

    1417717.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.7x their median

    No puedo creer los comentarios que veo en Tik Tok con gente pensando que se van a rematar las entradas de aespa en Lima. Es un concierto que ha vendido super bieny la expectativa es que agote. Esperar al final y buscar reventa barata es lo menos recomendable, no va a suceder.

    8590105.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hatebreed#lisacerati#marilynmanson#slipknot

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 86K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.872% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.60% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 326x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #hatebreed, #lisacerati, #marilynmanson.

What is Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo's engagement rate on X?
Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo (@danielefecto) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 86,324 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Daniel Vergaray D'Arrigo sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @danielefecto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @danielefecto post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going