Back to @dangambardello's profile

Dan Gambardello engagement report

@dangambardello - 317K followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.169%
of 317K followers
Per impression
2.51%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
6.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
535
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 535 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dan Gambardello's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.169%, Dan Gambardello sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.68%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,991 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video49% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 49% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 330 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20266.2x their median

    Let me get this straight... CLARITY Act vote Sept 15. Department of Labor is about to open the $10T 401(k) market. Business cycle is expanding for the first time since 2020. $176.8T sits with RIAs who can't touch spot crypto today, and the SEC just filed to change that. BNY Mellon, State Street and JPMorgan building out crypto custody But we're still not allowed to be bullish yet? None of this is priced in!!!!

    2.8K3369119122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.6x their median

    BREAKING: The CLARITY Act has failed to advance in the Senate after falling short on cloture. ACTIVATE ATKINS and the SEC! 🇺🇸 https://t.co/3ZkZA9RjQO

    2.5K3811042051K viewsView on X
  • Jan 19, 20255.3x their median

    I’m here as a crypto investor, tracking my investment journey. And it’s fun doing this with you all. But crypto & money mean nothing to me. Every second of every day, I’m realizing how thirsty and hungry I am to know Jesus Christ more. This is because more & more I understand how much of a sinner I am and how much I need Him. I feel like Paul in 1 Timothy when he writes that he’s the “chief of sinners”. But what’s awesome is that he starts that verse by saying Jesus Christ came into this world to save sinners. Sinners like Paul, and sinners like you and I. And that’s just the thing— Jesus is our only hope and salvation. So that when we stand before the judgment seat off Christ, we can know that there is “no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus”. Romans 8:1 “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Romans 5:1

    2.1K257417141.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.2x their median

    Congrats to Democrats on picking a fight with America and crypto at the same time. They are celebrating the Clarity Act stalling and they have no idea what they just did. Crypto has spent fifteen years getting told no, sued, banned in half the world, called a scam, and it came out bigger every single time. Same goes for this country, actually. Both America and crypto get stronger when somebody tries to hold them down. So democrats, congrats on the vote, but all you did was remind everybody why this thing exists in the first place. Crypto and America have never lost a fight like this, and they're not about to start now. Resilience, ingenuity, and crypto in America will win.

    2.2K3122191755K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    Disappointed with the CLARITY Act vote? Yes. Dooming over crypto because of it? Absolutely not! The SEC and CFTC were already working on a path forward. They ARE the backup plan. There are real limits to what they can do, but we’re not starting from zero. And my business cycle thesis never depended on a Senate vote either. Expansion ahead!

    1.6K235771247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.4x their median

    🚨 Clarity Act getting some legs! Let’s pass this America! 🇺🇸

    1.7K8454334K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.8x their median

    Be careful writing off Cardano. If ADA escapes, .40 in an instant https://t.co/ogkofoZX9l

    1.3K12670868K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    Welcome to September, the month the CLARITY Act passes! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸Let’s get this done, America!!!!!!!

    1.3K8853123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.6x their median

    There is something in the air. The crypto energy is returning.

    1.3K6469229K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.6x their median

    Parabolic move to start the real bull market on 10/10. Just do it!

    1.3K6963440K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 535 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.169%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 2.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

What is Dan Gambardello's engagement rate on X?
Dan Gambardello (@dangambardello) has an engagement rate of 0.169%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,011 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.169%, Dan Gambardello sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dangambardello have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dangambardello post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going