Damon Steel engagement report
@damonsteelvip - 47K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 2.66%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 14.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Damon Steel's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.66%, Damon Steel sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 100 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 21, 20265.4x their median
I almost didn't post this one, but I changed my mind 😈 https://t.co/AfKqdaQ1mQ
- Jan 12, 20262.8x their median
Would you like to date? https://t.co/zyvpaW6Krx https://t.co/VVNfgQAgLC
- Sep 24, 20261.6x their median
Would you mind if i come to you like this ? https://t.co/Ss950WoUeI
- Oct 20, 20261.6x their median
anyone wanna help me out, or are you all just here to look? 👀 https://t.co/6OIgM6i2ZT
- Oct 22, 20261.6x their median
I know exactly what you’re craving, now rate the daddy you want to get on your knees for https://t.co/LJZzzxICKA
- Sep 22, 20261.5x their median
Where’s the bottom that can take a long session? https://t.co/jaO2JbNmm4
- Sep 30, 20261.5x their median
Was just trying to get a quick mirror flex… then somehow the whole thing got messy. Should I show you how it ended? https://t.co/YUGSEtd7nF
- Oct 17, 2026
Suddenly hit with this strong feeling of wanting someone soft to touch me and spoil me… and the longer it sits the harder it is to ignore... https://t.co/hYeIAzHTiS
- Sep 26, 2026
If you were here, I wouldn’t start slow just to be nice. I’d start the way I actually want to. Could you keep up? https://t.co/Yp49s7OPxK
- Oct 16, 2026
need a bottom who can take a proper fucking without complaining https://t.co/XbhT91kV2M
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.2K interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 2.66%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 14.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.7K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
- What is Damon Steel's engagement rate on X?
- Damon Steel (@damonsteelvip) has an engagement rate of 2.66%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 46,680 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.66%, Damon Steel sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @damonsteelvip have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @damonsteelvip post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.