Back to @cyrilXBT's profile

CyrilXBT engagement report

@cyrilXBT - 197K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.046%
of 197K followers
Per impression
1.27%
7.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
91
interactions (median)
Saved
0.112%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 197K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #unsure.

Compared with accounts its own size

CyrilXBT's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.046%, CyrilXBT sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video61% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 61% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 420 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 24, 202618x their median

    https://t.co/4sLtyJzhmH

    1.7K19540337.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202616x their median

    I can't believe I'm giving all this away... The entire workflow, 13 prompts, and a full Claude skill to use for all the top video gen models you're welcome https://t.co/kYP1fmIt4c

    1.0K7625254304K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20267.4x their median

    https://t.co/SkcIaL0KmE

    567642414891K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.3x their median

    https://t.co/dihBsaIRDl

    23133316292K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.9x their median

    https://t.co/7DLWmWJrE4

    21533143308K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.9x their median

    As much as i want to have some much confidence in $BTC going up so we can all make money I want you to take a second and look at that volume below 😞 https://t.co/yjvWnl6UkF

    1312020241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    https://t.co/lxiSjcHtSf

    821217119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    this is absolutely unreal i used GPT-6 Astra to explode a turbofan jet engine into 3,412 individual pieces every blade, bolt, and fuel line separated in a single 3D render then watched it reassemble itself in real time we are so back on learning through visuals https://t.co/l2TklI51PZ

    9010708.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    $0. That's what it costs to prototype your next AI app. 1 repo. 29k+ stars. Dozens of free LLM providers. Every rate limit listed. Prototype on Groq for speed. Test on Google AI Studio for long context. Switch models on OpenRouter with one line. Ship first. Pay later. Save this. https://t.co/mHKaFemM2t

    7813706.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    claude is literally an ALL in one solution right now. what a time to be alive

    8110418.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#unsure

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 197K followers, an engagement rate of 0.046%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.1K times each, and 1.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is CyrilXBT's engagement rate on X?
CyrilXBT (@cyrilXBT) has an engagement rate of 0.046%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 197,298 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.046%, CyrilXBT sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cyrilXBT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cyrilXBT post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going