作家崔成浩 engagement report
@cuichenghao - 132K followers on X
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 180 interactions against 132K followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.613% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
作家崔成浩's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.137%, 作家崔成浩 sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 66% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 66% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 30, 20268.0x their median
亚运会夺得三块金牌的乒乓国手林诗栋抵达北京，但林诗栋看上去像个犯错的孩子，非但毫无笑意，看表情甚至快要哭出来。 得了几块金牌还不敢开心的笑，不敢说自己厉害，看看其他项目运动员，得奖后的表现，真的心疼乒乓球这些队员，被队内大哥的暴脾气压制太久了。 记得陈梦有一次得金牌后说不被领导认可，结果被网暴，还有樊振东得金牌后无人鼓掌，喊的都是别人名字，这一次轮到林诗栋，连夺多块金牌后，小心翼翼的像犯错了一样。 我记得在男单领奖台，仪式刚一结束，王楚钦就摘掉脖子上的银牌，吓得林诗栋一秒都没犹豫，赶紧摘掉金牌，怯怯地跟在王楚钦身后。 看起来，中国乒乓球队队内的这种氛围十分压抑不正常，年轻队员只有挨欺负的份，水平高的不敢露头，樊振东如果不远走高飞，非得弄出抑郁症来。 以小见大，在这种体制下，各行各业，无论哪里都和今天的乒乓球队一样，有本事的不一定用你，你得有领导赏识有大哥才行。
- Sep 30, 20267.6x their median
中医认为蝉能治嗓子，因为它的发声很大。但是我们都知道，蝉是靠鼓膜发声的。 中医认为蝙蝠晚上的视力惊人，就把夜明沙，也就是蝙蝠拉的屎用来明目。其实蝙蝠实力很弱，它的飞行靠的是超声波，不是视力。 中医认为穿山甲能打洞，就用它来打通人体各种不通的地方，比如常用来催乳。 中医认为核桃撬开之后像人的脑子，能补脑，但核桃产地的人群并没有显得智商高于其他地区的人们。 中医看到黑豆像腰子，就常常用它来补肾。其实黑豆吃多了对肾不好。 中医类似这样的经典理论不胜枚举，为什么今天还有那么多人信这些偏方呢？ 当年八路军到处找盘尼西林，怎么队伍后头不跟个老中医呢？
- Sep 30, 20266.7x their median
又赢了！ 西安某博物馆一枚2000年前的铜镜，上面竟然有“人民昌，中国强”的铭文，引发网友群嘲。 有人问，2000年前，那就是1999年生产的？ 还有网友讥讽称，永乐大典还规定上五休二，说这些有用吗？ 有越来越多的人，已经对官方的大国叙事不感兴趣。官媒无论怎么煽风，已有越来越多的人不为所动。 https://t.co/N1QBix7Twz
- Sep 26, 20266.2x their median
你们信不信？ 中秋节可以赏月， 是因为月亮在天上， 如果在地上， 会被它们圈起来收费。
- Sep 30, 20265.0x their median
有了跳高比赛，轻功就消失了。 有了百米短跑，踏雪无痕就没影了。 有了举重比赛，千斤神力就没有了。 有了马拉松比赛，神行太保也不见了。 有了实战散打，隔空打人当场失灵。 有了扇耳光比赛，铁砂掌突然失传了。 有了竞技摔跤，四两拨千斤就开始不好使了。 有了硬核的格斗，那么内力气功，全都原形毕露。 有了UFC擂台，武林高手集体沉默了。 所以，凡是不能被验证的强大，都只是骗三岁小孩的杂耍表演。 没经过实战考验的军事能力，也是一样。
- Sep 27, 20264.9x their median
再读道德经，我发现， 书中5000多个字，没有一个字是讲努力的， 里面每一篇都是说， 找个适应自己的环境，让自己闲下来， 虚静、复命、知足、无为而无不为， 这大概就是生命的终极意义。
- Sep 30, 20264.5x their median
这是内地某三甲医院内科主任发的长文，他经历了多台手术，感叹劳碌奔波的国人拿命换钱，就是一张人生单程票。 “又是一台晚期胰腺癌。 患者才四十一岁，一家科技公司的中层骨干。腹腔一打开，癌细胞已经广泛腹膜转移，连姑息切除的机会都没给，只能取个活检关腹。 术前谈话时，他妻子靠着走廊墙壁，脸色惨白，声音发抖地问我：“李教授，还有希望吗？他平时就是有点胃疼，怎么会是胰腺癌呢……” 我一时间竟讲不出话来。行医二十多年，主刀的肝胆胰手术上千台，这种走廊里的绝望我见得太多，每一次都像针一样扎在心上。 中国人到底什么时候才能彻底明白：拿命换钱，从医学和生理规律上讲，都没有任何意义。 很多人总觉得身体透支了还能补回来，但在我们外科医生眼里，细胞的恶变是一张单程票。 更残酷的现实是：你熬夜加班、放弃节假日攒下的那几十万，在ICU和靶向药面前，撑不过三个月。 我见过太多病房里的顶梁柱，前半生拿命换房贷、换业绩、换所谓的地位，以为自己扛起了全家；后半生却躺在床上插满引流管，连大小便都得靠人翻身擦洗，尊严荡然无存。 那时候他们眼里只有绝望：“只要能活着，我什么都不要了。” 更残忍的是，到了这一步，很多病人连花钱买命的资格都没有——病灶侵犯了大血管，肿瘤广泛转移，哪怕你把整座金山搬进手术室，主刀医生的刀也根本切不下去。 中国人讲究拼搏，骨子里总有一种“用命换前程”的悲壮感，总觉得“牺牲自己、成全全家”是一种担当。 我深知生活的压力确实沉重，房贷、车贷、养老、育儿，谁都在咬牙硬抗。 但请记住：身体才是所有可能性的承载体，真正的责任感，绝不是在年轻时把自己当成耗材去赌一个未知的未来。 一旦健康归零，你拼尽全力挣来的一切瞬间失去意义，留给家人的只有天塌地陷的痛苦与债务。 有些话真的不吐不快，从医这么多年，今年似乎才开始真正思考，人这一生，这么拼搏，最终换来一个病痛缠身的局面，到底值不值得。 可能在这个世界上，能平平安安地活着，能坐在饭桌前陪家人说说话，才是最大的幸福吧。” 看完不由得令人唏嘘，所以小崔觉得，最可怕的不是人们不知道健康的重要，而是很多人明明知道，却根本没有停下来的资格。 不敢辞职，不敢休息，不敢拒绝加班，怕失去收入。 房贷、孩子、老人，一层层压下来，最后连身体都成了可以透支的资产。 嘴上说着拼几年就好了，可身体从来不会按照你的计划表恢复，而且想停下来遥遥无期。 所以真正值得反思的，不是劝普通人别拼命这么简单，而是为什么中国人必须拿健康去交换最基本的生活保障？ 还有一句话可能更扎心：钱没了可以再挣，工作没了可以再找，唯独身体坏了，很多时候没有重来的机会。 年轻时总觉得来日方长，等真正躺进医院才发现，人生最大的奢侈，真不是什么豪宅和名车，而是还能健康地走回家吃一顿饭。
- Sep 29, 20264.2x their median
该来的还是来了，北京理工大学开除涉事女教师。 北京理工大学于9月29日发布情况通报，对法学院教师裴某作出取消硕导资格、撤销教职并解聘的处理决定。 顶格处罚：取消裴某研究生指导教师资格，撤销其北京理工大学教师岗位任职资格，解除聘用关系，属“三连”处理。 校方定性：经查实，裴某存在严重违反教师职业道德规范和行为准则等行为，造成严重不良影响，重申对师德失范“零容忍”。 裴某拥有两段一年制英国硕士学历，入职北理工后快速升至院长助理等职，被质疑招聘与晋升机制不合理。 处分这么重，通报却只说严重违反师德，究竟做了什么，公众看完还是不知道。 如果涉及学生隐私，细节当然要保护。但至少该说明行为属于哪一类，学校是怎样核实的，有没有受影响的学生需要帮助。 否则，大家只看见处理了一个老师，却看不见问题是怎么发生的，以后还什么避免？ 是学校怕丢人，还是为保护当事人隐私，处理意见实际上还是语焉不详。
- Sep 29, 20264.1x their median
你学历水，没人管你， 你搞女拳，没人管你， 你传出风言风语，也没有管你， 你特么议论常委性别，重拳出击👊 你以为你是谁？🤣 https://t.co/wliWEev4eQ
- Sep 29, 20263.4x their median
深圳卓悦中心的大嘴鱼，被网友映射余大嘴，昨日被拆了。 此前，上海外滩一个厕所指示牌，因为能和华为门店同框，也被拆了。 如果一家企业，网友几句玩笑也能恼羞成怒，你就算能出再好的产品，也收买不到人心。 https://t.co/AwqaDE49xX
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 180 interactions against 132K followers, an engagement rate of 0.137%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.613% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 66% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 8.0x its own typical post.
- What is 作家崔成浩's engagement rate on X?
- 作家崔成浩 (@cuichenghao) has an engagement rate of 0.137%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,007 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.137%, 作家崔成浩 sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @cuichenghao have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @cuichenghao post?
- Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.