泯灭🦞 engagement report
@cryptoraytrader - 191K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.124% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
泯灭🦞's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.004%, 泯灭🦞 sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.67% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 14% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 496 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 28, 202614x their median
$EMBER 的市值已回落至 900 万美元左右，仅凭这一点就足以让我重新认真审视其市场态势。鉴于该代币此前经历的种种波折，如今其估值重回这一水平，为我们提供了一个有趣的契机，让我们能以全新的视角重新评估相关数据、价格结构以及更宏观的市场叙事。@embercurve 5dvXTZ5qwgafnHtwu3Ls3QrWx1U4LQsFeCuJgkk4QEC6 值得注意的是，EMBER 已经证明了自己具备在市场动能积聚时吸引大量关注的能力。随着代币价格重回 900 万美元区间，接下来的关键在于这一价位能否转化为下一阶段行情的坚实底部。 我打算深入分析各项数据，探究当前的市场结构究竟传递了何种信号。在 900 万美元的市值水平上，EMBER 无疑已重回投资者视野；如果链上活跃度能与这种回升的关注度相匹配，那么接下来的行情发展将变得极具看点。
- Sep 29, 202612x their median
$TART 重新进入市场视野，近期的表现确实值得关注。 CA: 0x7ab8d02cbb51ff7223fde700eaaa2a91bf750314 相比单纯依靠短期热度的项目，TART 更值得观察的地方在于它正在逐渐形成自己的市场叙事和社区关注度。随着越来越多资金和交易者开始注意到这个项目，市场对 TART 的讨论也在不断增加。@TartProtocol 围绕 TART 的社区活跃度同样值得关注。对于一个早期项目来说，短期的价格波动并不是最重要的，真正值得观察的是社区能否持续保持活跃，以及市场关注度能否不断扩大。如果后续 TART 能够继续保持目前的热度，同时流动性和交易活跃度进一步提升，那么它的市场表现或许还有更大的想象空间。 在考虑进一步关注之前，我更希望看到几个信号：社区持续活跃、市场关注度不断提升，以及真实交易量能够持续增长。目前来看，TART 的故事还在展开，后续值得继续盯着。
- Aug 20, 20267.5x their median
观察一个加密项目，我更愿意把目光放在它能够沉淀什么，而不是短期制造了多少话题。市场注意力来得快也去得快，真正决定项目能否持续发展的，是品牌特色、社区基础以及用户是否愿意长期参与。 $Dealer 目前给我的感觉，是仍然存在进一步塑造自身定位的空间。一个项目如果能够不断围绕自己的特点建立内容和社区文化，就有机会让最初的市场关注逐渐转化成更加稳定的用户认知。对 Dealer 来说，未来如何把自身特色讲得更加清晰，是值得继续观察的地方。 我尤其看重社区在其中发挥的作用。一个真正有活力的社区，并不只是等待项目发布消息，而是能够主动交流、分享内容并形成自己的讨论氛围。如果 Dealer 能够持续增加社区参与的机会，让用户拥有更多表达和互动的空间，那么这种自发形成的社区文化可能会成为项目长期成长的重要动力。 从品牌角度来看，Dealer 也需要逐渐建立属于自己的辨识度。面对不断变化的市场叙事，一个容易被记住的品牌往往需要稳定的风格和持续的内容积累。与其频繁追逐短期热点，我更期待 Dealer 能够找到适合自己的发展节奏，并通过长期运营强化用户对项目的印象。 当然，真正的发展潜力最终还是要通过实际行动来验证。未来 Dealer 能否持续保持社区活跃、提升用户参与度，并在市场环境变化时及时调整，都值得长期跟踪。如果这些方面能够逐步形成良性循环，那么项目现有的关注度就有机会转化成更具持续性的社区价值。 对我而言，Dealer 后续最值得关注的并不是某一个短期数据，而是它能否持续积累内容、用户和品牌影响力。只要能够在时间中不断完善自身定位，并让社区保持真实而稳定的参与感，那么它未来的发展空间依然值得保持观察。 以上仅代表个人观点，不构成任何投资建议，请大家保持独立思考并做好自己的研究（DYOR）。 https://t.co/XBU7lDcX9N 6f8ZQhxqfigdv7UszZ1rirbV7Sgv83s3rxv1N2Zopump
- Sep 16, 20265.1x their median
$STONK 正为市场提供另一个机会，让投资者能够未雨绸缪，而不是在行情启动后才盲目追涨。 如果价格回落至市值约 1 亿美元的低位区间，对于那些希望建立仓位而非因“错失恐惧”（FOMO）而在高位追入的交易者来说，这将是一个值得关注的区域。@LaunchOnSF 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx 就我个人而言，我会密切关注该区域，寻找再次入场的时机。关键在于，要在市场大众重新关注该标的之前，就洞察到潜在的投资机会。STONK 始终在我的关注名单上，若出现显著回调，其投资布局的吸引力将会进一步增强。
- Sep 15, 20265.0x their median
自 $ZZZ 最初引起我关注以来，它显然已进入一个新阶段；其价格的大幅重估使其成为重新审视这一投资逻辑的绝佳时机。 这一走势之所以引人注目，是因为相关的市场叙事并未消失——市场有了更多时间去消化这些信息，而 ZZZ 的价格也实现了显著上涨。这种走势通常表明，市场开始赋予其底层故事更高的价值，而不再仅仅将其视为昙花一现的“模因（meme）”炒作。@AndrewCurran_ 0x7dbf38976f6D3b9c529e7D9484A71898B409eE6a 最初的投资逻辑之所以具有吸引力，是因为 ZZZ 同时关联了多个热门关注点（即“注意力引擎”）：AI 依然是加密货币领域最强劲的叙事之一；X（原 Twitter）在信息与文化传播方面持续发挥着巨大作用；GMX 带来了生态层面的炒作预期；而 Robinhood Chain 正逐渐演变为承载新资产与新社群的活跃阵地。当多种叙事汇聚于同一个代币时，其上涨潜力便不仅仅源于单一的催化剂。 市场已表明，它愿意大幅重估该项目，使其估值远超最初的 1500 万至 2000 万美元区间。起初，这或许只是一场围绕 AI 概念、X/GMX 炒作及 Robinhood Chain 预期的押注；如今，它已演变成一个更加成熟、备受瞩目的叙事。随着 Robinhood Chain 叙事进入下一阶段，ZZZ 无疑是我会持续关注的重点标的之一。
- Sep 14, 20264.8x their median
robinhood:0xf44702b17d9abd53815f703e772f35e9c71a53af 值得比现在更仔细地研究。虽然许多项目都使用代理人工智能叙述作为营销角度，但 RAXOL 实际上专注于构建能够解决自主交易中实际问题的基础设施。 0xf44702b17d9abd53815f703e772f35e9c71a53af 这里更大的机会是代理交易可能成为加密货币市场下一步发展的主要部分。随着越来越多的交易者和协议依赖于自治系统，这些代理之下的基础设施变得与代理本身一样重要。他们需要可靠的执行、更好的流动性获取、以隐私为导向的机制、恢复系统以及使他们能够在真实市场条件下高效运作的工具。@axol_io 这就是为什么我一直密切关注 RAXOL。市场可能仍在关注股票行情和人工智能的叙述，但更有趣的故事是其背后正在构建的内容。如果团队继续提供有意义的基础设施，并且市场最终开始认识到技术而不仅仅是叙述，那么 RAXOL 的估值故事可能会截然不同。
- Oct 11, 20264.4x their median
人工智能代理的功能已不再局限于生成回复。 下, 步是为它们提供基础设施，使其能够独立获取资源、管理支出并执行任务。🤖@orbiodotso 正是这种发展方向使得 $ORBIO 成为 Robinhood Chain 上, 个值得关注的项目。其理念是构建, 个人工智能驱动的生态系统，在这个系统中，代理可以获取信贷、共享计算资源并为后续任务提供资金。 随着人工智能代理能力的不断提升，支撑其运行的基础设施可能变得与模型本身同样重要。 另, 个新兴理念是代理间金融。 0xaa07a0e9209e16ac99708c3ec70159c6ef3128a3 传统的借贷模式严重依赖于既定的信用记录和借款人身份识别，但自动化代理则带来了, 系列不同的挑战。 PRIORS 模型探索了, 种基于抵押品的模式：用户质押代币，通过按时还款建立信用档案，从而获得更大额度的贷款资格。如果还款失败，则根据既定机制，质押的抵押品将被销毁。 这种设计引发了关于问责制、激励机制以及链上代理经济中信用评估机制运作方式等诸多有趣的问题。 与此同时，ORBIO 也因融资 120 万美元的消息而备受关注。 目前社区分享的信息并未独立披露投资者身份、估值或融资条款，因此这些细节仍需核实。 对于 ORBIO 而言，关键问题在于其愿景能否有效转化为可靠的产品和可持续的应用。 随着时间的推移，代理的实际运行、透明的融资信息以及实际的集成将比公众关注更为重要。 人工智能代理与链上基础设施的融合仍在不断发展，而 ORBIO 正是这场持续对话的, 部分。🤖⚙️
- Oct 12, 20264.0x their median
大家都看着 $BLUECHIP 的走势图，以为它已经结束了，但持有者的数据却揭示了, 个更为复杂的故事。🔷♟️ 自 9 月 5 日达到峰值以来，BLUECHIP 的市值暴跌。然而，据报道，同期持有至少 10 美元代币的钱包数量从 2,929 个减少到 2,685 个。这比价格所显示的跌幅要小得多。 时机也至关重要。 CA: 0xb200000000000000000000cfbdf64a8706a94a01 根据共享的分析，许多在最后上市阶段购买的钱包已经抛售，而新持有者则表现出更高的留存率。 https://t.co/Mr4HMk2aFY 据报道，目前约有 55% 的 BLUECHIP 持有者是在 9 月 5 日之后加入的，而且 9 月 27 日当周的买家留存率高于峰值后的第, 周。 这并不意味着, 定会复苏，但它挑战了所有持有者都已放弃该项目的说法。些参与者离开了，另些留了下来，还有, 批新成员加入。社区构成正在发生变化，但并非彻底消失。 另, 个值得注意的细节是，自 10 月 2 日以来，持有者数量保持稳定。这能否成为恢复活跃交易的基础，取决于持续的参与度、流动性和实际需求，而不仅仅是几根上涨的K线。 BLUECHIP 通过 @o1_exchange 发行，随后在 coinbase 上线，使其在 Base 生态系统中占据了重要地位。上线本身并不能保证长期成功，但项目的下, 阶段将取决于它能否留住社区并持续吸引用户的兴趣。 目前的重点很简单：监测持有者趋势、交易活动，以及 BLUECHIP 能否随着时间的推移建立更稳定的基础。图表显示持有者数量有所下降；钱包数据则提供了另, 部分信息。🔷
- Sep 26, 20263.6x their median
$UP 目前似乎被市场忽视了，但我认为，随着 Robinhood 生态系统的持续扩张，市场可能低估了它的潜力。围绕 Robinhood 的整体叙事正吸引着更多的关注、流动性和新参与者，而 UP 正好处于这一生态系统的核心位置。 UP 的看点在于，它有望跟随 Robinhood 生态代币的整体热潮同步上涨。随着更多资金轮动进入 Robinhood 原生项目，且相关叙事持续升温，UP 有望借势而上，而非被市场抛在身后。生态系统发展得越壮大，这一标的的潜力就越值得关注。@uponrh 0x57c0e45cb534413d1c20a4240955d6bb250bb4f1 我依然认为 UP 具备给市场带来惊喜的巨大空间。鉴于 Robinhood 叙事热度高涨，且流动性持续向该生态项目轮动，这绝不是一个我会过早看空的代币。
- Jul 30, 20263.6x their median
最近市场上出现了很多新项目，但 $BOBO 是我一直关注的一个。 团队持续推进项目建设，不断优化产品和生态，让我看到了长期发展的潜力社区也越来越活跃，大家积极交流项目未来的发展方向。 期待 BOBO 在未来取得更好的成绩。 4nV5gNwwP68zUDat26ySChREqVaQaLudfJBkSgEzpump https://t.co/g2DWHpK99E
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.124% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is 泯灭🦞's engagement rate on X?
- 泯灭🦞 (@cryptoraytrader) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 190,951 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.004%, 泯灭🦞 sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @cryptoraytrader have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @cryptoraytrader post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.