Back to @cryptomanran's profile

Ran Neuner engagement report

@cryptomanran - 965K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 965K followers
Per impression
0.642%
42K views on a typical post
Reach
4.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
270
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
12 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 965K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 139x its own typical post.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ran Neuner's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, Ran Neuner sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video63% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link24% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 63% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 27, 2026139x their median

    Mayor Mamdani just announced that he will be opening 5 city-run, tax-funded grocery stores: "Prices set at 30% below retail prices" https://t.co/lBk5MQhZRL

    22K2.4K9.8K3.1K15M viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202644x their median

    Elon’s missed promises 😳 https://t.co/DGfGVnl6d2

    9.9K1.3K385131636K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202614x their median

    If you're in AI, use crypto

    3.3K247445195364K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202615x their median

    listen man, we built the best boomer casino in the world with hyperliquid, we built the best zoomer casino in the world with pumpfun they’re printing dollars to buyback our debt, the president has his own memecoin & he’s hard shilling BTC the only direction left is up

    3.5K26134528226K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20269.6x their median

    Remarkable criticism of Treasury Sec Scott Bessent by his former boss, Stan Druckenmiller, esp this: "Once markets believe Treasury is defending a price, every rise in yields becomes a test of official resolve, and the operations must grow to survive the tests." https://t.co/ZqIin8qRkM

    2.0K4779563310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.7x their median

    Most people I know that bought sports cars, mansions and watches in the bull, literally went bust in the bear. Houses and cars repossessed, watches sold at a discount and worse,they lost their relationships that were based on sports cars and bottles in St Tropez clubs. Having lost everything twice. I learnt to respect money, no matter how fast it can be made. Things can turn quick and when they do, he with cash is king and watches and cars mean nothing. I sold a business for over $100m before crypto and I’ve been in crypto for a long time to have made more than enough. I never bought a sports car, never hired a private jet, never set foot in Prada or Louis Vuitton . It’s not because I can’t , it’s because having lost it all before - I respect money. We are about to go into a new cycle, you will make tons of cash. This time, think twice about what you do with it!

    2.0K11621814105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.0x their median

    If this is your 3rd cycle in crypto, this is the one where you will actually make money! (And keep some)

    1.9K78161880K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20267.5x their median

    HERE IS WHY BITCOIN IS FLYING: 1. The USA is doubling it's purchases of it's own debt. This effectively means that they issuing debt and then printing money to buy it back. In other words, the money printer is back on. 2. Bitcoin has been coiled for 81 days in the same range. These coils land up in big moves. The bigger the coil, and this one was big, the bigger the move! Bitcoin responds to liquidity and the US just caved. This could be a long and sustained move!

    1.7K17612614170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.1x their median

    I’m going to give credit where it’s due. The person who called this entire cycle perfectly so far is @IvanOnTech . He called the top but more importantly he pivoted full bullish about a month ago. I thought he was early but he was correct. Go and check his account and his videos. All the receipts are there. Well played bro!

    1.6K90194697K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20267.0x their median

    IYKYK https://t.co/xtV9dFe9zF

    1.6K1431551799K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 270 interactions against 965K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 42K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 63% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 139x its own typical post.

What is Ran Neuner's engagement rate on X?
Ran Neuner (@cryptomanran) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 964,507 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, Ran Neuner sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cryptomanran have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cryptomanran post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going