Back to @cryptobaddiee1's profile

cryptobaddie engagement report

@cryptobaddiee1 - 142K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.088%
of 142K followers
Per impression
1.41%
9.0K views on a typical post
Reach
6.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 181x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

cryptobaddie's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.088%, cryptobaddie sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video31% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 31% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 2026181x their median

    Me in the shower thinking about all the profits I never took: https://t.co/F9MuRDPJOs

    20K1.8K695149811K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202670x their median

    you do not need anything else other than an internet connection & an iphone to make $1,000,000+ over the next 12 months tokenization supercycle + 24/7 perps + social trading emerging seriously for the first time as a global metagame is going to give insane opportunities to those terminally online that learn how to trade attention & virality

    7.3K709569179600K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202617x their median

    To some people, this seems unreal and unrealistic I'm under 20 years old i made around $1.8M this month off trading memecoins alone (even more from my other businesses) I called $CATE, $PAID, $PONS early ask me anything. https://t.co/boXyYnWXfD

    87752069824139K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202610.0x their median

    if your main thesis for a coin is 'Unipcs aped' or 'Unipcs is in' that's incredibly BEARISH ngl and you're a gambler, not an investor in that case, you should also familiarize yourself with the phrase 'no crying in the casino' sorry, had to give it to you raw!

    910352951971K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.5x their median

    Someone commented “Una no see Italy or Argentina wey their school fees be $200/ year “😂😂😂😭😭😭

    8951625335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20267.4x their median

    Trader @pointfarmcap just landed on Pumpfun with $16,401,320.77! https://t.co/JmMKGNpm4P

    7433013528307K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.4x their median

    Interesting how irrelevant Binance has become to the crypto trenches. None of the major runners are listed on Binance and all price discovery happens onchain. And perp dexes taking their perp volumes too. Plus, tokenized stock meta requires licenses and regulations that Binance lacks so their regulatory arbitrage isn’t paying off in this meta. CEXs are mostly good for fiat onramp/offramp. But even for this Binance isn’t an option in the US and the EU.

    548239420112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.4x their median

    In whatever you do , pray you never get vulnerable to the extent that your only hope is in the hands of your Nigerian followers on X , that’s why I have always been shouting it since 2023 “most of your followers are not good people “ they are following you for what they will gain from you, if you are winning they want what you have , they wish it was them , they pray you lose it all so yall will be on same playing ground, THEY ARE NOT GOOD PEOPLE. I don’t know much about what this guy has done on X but I know there was a time he was so big he was running giveaways and sharing NFTs that cooked so well … now yall are mocking him ?? If you like let the praise of Twitter people get to your head.

    290101945765K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.2x their median

    Imagine comparing yourself to ansem … all he needs to do to make $1m is to reply one of his DMs …

    5021812221K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.8x their median

    BITGET EXPLOITED FOR $100M ALREADY. Another day in crypto. https://t.co/UsPBMEAKgf

    287261531644K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 142K followers, an engagement rate of 0.088%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 31% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 181x its own typical post.

What is cryptobaddie's engagement rate on X?
cryptobaddie (@cryptobaddiee1) has an engagement rate of 0.088%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 142,185 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.088%, cryptobaddie sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cryptobaddiee1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cryptobaddiee1 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going