Back to @cryptoady's profile

Aditya Singh engagement report

@cryptoady - 438K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.051%
of 438K followers
Per impression
1.54%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
221
interactions (median)
Saved
0.119%
17 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 438K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aditya Singh's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.051%, Aditya Singh sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 148 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 3, 202256x their median

    Started petition: Urging the government to reconsider & reduce crypto tax. These new crypto tax rules are too harsh & will hurt the entire industry. Petition Link - https://t.co/B0OKWedD5q #reducecryptotax

    6.3K4.1K1.4K572View on X
  • Sep 23, 20268.8x their median

    🚨IRAN President’s Speech at UNSA https://t.co/VBMCaqKTa4

    1.6K26342154K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 20266.6x their median

    Crypto Exchanges like Binance, Wazirx & Zebpay have been invited to lok sabha for a meeting with Standing committee of Finance. India’s leading exchanges Coinswitch & Coindcx were not invited. Explained 👇 https://t.co/XYKVTB8ins

    89811239572K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 20263.9x their median

    🚨 Bloomberg claimed RBI sold $12B worth of gold. RBI responded by sharing its gold holdings. But there’s a catch 👀 The holdings shared were till April 24, while Bloomberg’s claim relates to a period before May 22. I went digging, this is what I found. https://t.co/6pyudKRHZI

    643188241035K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.3x their median

    🚨 TRUMP THREATENS IRAN AT UNGA 2026 UN was created to prevent another World War. 81 years later… boys still naughty. 💀🌍 https://t.co/pee27qH4hP

    6535916048K viewsView on X
  • May 21, 20262.3x their median

    Update on Crypto Exchanges | Binance, Wazirx, Zebpay - meeting in Lok Sabha https://t.co/uBY0fHMAZn

    4325228123K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20262.0x their median

    Bitcoin Bottom - $45,000-$50,000 range Around Oct-November 2026

    3392471430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.0x their median

    🚨US senate Votes on Crypto Clarity Act tonight at 11:30 PM IST. Watch this video to know everything that has happened in the last few days including changes in Clarity Act Bill. https://t.co/oMmnba1Buw

    393327022K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.8x their median

    Breaking : Clarity Act fails to get 60 votes. What now ? https://t.co/AON6z3B6tW

    372296020K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 20262.5x their median

    🚨Largest US ARMY buildup in middle east since IRAQ WAR https://t.co/RulIZM7Ky8

    359365018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 221 interactions against 438K followers, an engagement rate of 0.051%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 56x its own typical post.

What is Aditya Singh's engagement rate on X?
Aditya Singh (@cryptoady) has an engagement rate of 0.051%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 437,559 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.051%, Aditya Singh sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cryptoady have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cryptoady post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going