Back to @crypto_queen_x's profile

XRP QUEEN🤍 engagement report

@crypto_queen_x - 96K followers on X

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.052%
of 96K followers
Per impression
1.58%
3.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
50
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.93/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 216x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #xrp, #xrpl, #banxnetwork.

Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #xrp, #xrpl, #banxnetwork.

Compared with accounts its own size

XRP QUEEN🤍's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.052%, XRP QUEEN🤍 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026216x their median

    Today, I voted no on the Clarity Act, legislation meant to regulate cryptocurrency in America. The ethics provisions in this bill are simply too thin. President Trump, his children, and his Cabinet are making billions of dollars in the crypto space, in part from bilking everyday Americans out of their hard-earned money. I cannot in good conscience vote for any legislation that codifies that behavior from public officials. Not for President Trump or Secretary Lutnick today, nor for any Democrat who may take advantage of it in the future. On the national security front, there is more to be done to make sure we have the tools in place to stop money laundering and shut down funding avenues for terrorists and nations like North Korea and Iran. This was essential after 9/11 and remains essential to keep Americans safe. And as of now, our agencies, including the CFTC, lack the necessary oversight and staffing to implement this legislation, and that should be addressed. There are strong, bipartisan provisions in this bill that could serve as the foundation for a new attempt at providing the crypto industry with the guardrails it needs. I believe that the U.S. should lead the world in cryptocurrency innovation, but we need to get it right. I remain open-minded to that work ahead.

    2.2K2828.1K308720K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202382x their median

    He loves a filter🤭 @attorneyjeremy1 https://t.co/0U188ttHYc

    3.2K378548181.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202655x their median

    🔴 LIVE: watch the CLARITY Act's procedural vote happen in real time on the Senate floor. https://t.co/At17bBZ3x2

    2.0K446185102566K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202622x their median

    https://t.co/lWpkvCAWcE

    712320531413K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202622x their median

    people tend to focus on what’s wrong in their lives. but if you instead focus on what’s going well, your life will improve immeasurably.

    9418150520K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202611x their median

    I WILL NEVER SELL MY XRP WHOS WITH ME?!?!

    4531270511K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.0x their median

    IN ONE HOUR OUR LIVES COULD CHANGE FOREVER https://t.co/UZC8jKM6qD

    290397007.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.1x their median

    *XRP holders before every major catalyst* “This time feels different.” Narrator: It was, in fact... not different.

    2671323211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.3x their median

    LETS GOOOO 🚀🚀🚀🚀 $XRP https://t.co/Y9pgIBoYar

    227271003.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.7x their median

    🚨 THIS IS HUGE FOR $XRP 🇺🇸 US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is pushing Congress to pass the CLARITY Act. Clear crypto rules could finally give banks and institutions the confidence to use regulated digital assets at scale, exactly the environment XRP and Ripple’s payment technology were built for. Regulatory clarity unlocks adoption. XRP is positioned for it. https://t.co/gXyISx77CO

    197333013K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#xrp#xrpl#banxnetwork#crypto#ripple

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 50 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.052%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 1.58% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 216x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #xrp, #xrpl, #banxnetwork.

What is XRP QUEEN🤍's engagement rate on X?
XRP QUEEN🤍 (@crypto_queen_x) has an engagement rate of 0.052%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,961 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.052%, XRP QUEEN🤍 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @crypto_queen_x have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @crypto_queen_x post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going