Back to @crypto_futur's profile

Crypto Futur engagement report

@crypto_futur - 272K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.071%
of 272K followers
Per impression
0.51%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
13.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 568 interactions, about 2.9x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.071%, Crypto Futur sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 24, 20252.9x their median

    Je pense qu’on a plus de chances de partir en bear market que de relancer le bull run ! Voici pourquoi : 1/ Niveau macro-Ă©conomie : – On peut avoir un rebond du marchĂ© avec un regain d’espoir grĂące Ă  la baisse des taux de dĂ©cembre qui risque de se valider. Mais ce seul catalyseur ne suffira pas Ă  garder le marchĂ© haussier. Surtout si la FED baisse les taux en dĂ©cembre, elle risque d’annoncer de la prudence pour dĂ©but 2026 et ne pas se prĂ©cipiter Ă  enchaĂźner les baisses des taux. – Le QT se finit le 1/12/2025 et tout le monde est bullish pour le prochain QE, mais historiquement le QE met 6 Ă  18 mois Ă  se lancer. Dans les conditions Ă©conomiques actuelles, un QE qui arrive au bout de 6–12 mois, donc fin 2026, serait plutĂŽt logique. Et 6–12 mois c’est long ! On a le temps de se taper un bear market, surtout si le top Ă©tait dĂ©but octobre. – MĂȘme si tout le monde s’enjaille sur la liquiditĂ© globale qui devrait arriver avec la fin du QT dĂ©but 2026, j’ai quelques doutes. Je pense que les attentes du marchĂ© sur cette liquiditĂ© sont trop hautes par rapport Ă  la rĂ©alitĂ©. – À ne pas oublier aussi, les marchĂ©s traditionnels sont sur des plus hauts historiques, et le dollar pose progressivement son bottom en weekly. Pour moi, dĂ©but et mi-2026 restent trop bearish niveau macro pour avoir un nouvel ATH sur les cryptos. Par contre, fin 2026 s’annonce bien plus optimiste avec le dĂ©but du QE, et ça coĂŻnciderait pile avec la fin du bear market aprĂšs un an de baisse. 2/ Niveau technique : – Un dead cat bounce vers 96–100k$, pile sur les 0.382 de fibo, avec le retest du ruban weekly et la zone de liquidations de shorts Ă  cet endroit, me paraĂźt parfait pour poser un rebond avant un bear market. – Le gros signal qui me fait peur aussi, c’est le croisement bearish du MACD en mensuel. À chaque fois qu’on l’a eu (juillet 2018 et janvier 2022), on Ă©tait sur les phases de dead cat bounce avant le bear market. Et lĂ , pour la premiĂšre fois depuis le dĂ©but du bull run, le mois de novembre risque de valider ce croisement bearish du MACD. – Dernier point pour la target du bear market, on risque de baisser pendant une bonne annĂ©e, jusqu’à fin 2026, et revenir au 0.786 de fibo qu’on vient chercher Ă  chaque bear market, autour des 40k$. Ma zone d’achat commencera Ă  60k$ jusqu’à 40k$, et tout ce qu’il y a en dessous des 40k$ sera pour moi la zone de bottom Ă  acheter Ă  fond. C’est historiquement lĂ  oĂč on a toujours fait nos bottoms en dessous des 0.786 de fibo (2011, 2015, 2018, 2022).

    408431107314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.6x their median

    Ya que moi que ça choque les liq Ă  62-60k$ ? On Ă©tait tous choquĂ©s quand on a break les 68k et qu’il y avait +3B$ de liquidations avec le giga short squeeze. Maintenant, regardez la diffĂ©rence de volume entre les liq Ă  68k et celles Ă  62k$. Si on vient chercher cette zone 62-60k$, ça va ĂȘtre entre 5-10B$ de liquidations long qu’on va sortir.

    4123556677K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    Ça pourrait ĂȘtre terrifiant de faire une distribution Wyckoff juste en dessous des 82k $, pour retourner chercher la monstrueuse zone de liquiditĂ© Ă  62k $. https://t.co/077c65vFIc

    2112128338K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Je maintiens le mĂȘme scĂ©nario sur BTC : Eange deviation, break par le bas pour combler la FVG weekly/daily, voire sortir la poche de liquiditĂ© Ă  62k, avant de repartir. https://t.co/5kObO3X2kK

    1741524241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    C’est dommage pour hier. On aurait pu enfoncer le support des 76k $ et valider la figure de distribution Ă  la baisse, ça aurait Ă©tĂ© propre. Les acheteurs sont encore trop forts, on a inversĂ© la tendance en H1, c’est plutĂŽt mal parti. À voir comment on rĂ©agit dans la petite FVG H1 au-dessus, mais il y a des chances qu’on vienne rĂ©cupĂ©rer les liquiditĂ©s sur les plus hauts Ă  81,5k $. MalgrĂ© ça, je reste toujours favorable Ă  une baisse qui viendrait chercher les FVG weekly Ă  70k $ et surtout la monstrueuse zone de liquiditĂ© Ă  62k $.

    147838138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Distribution Wyckoff 2021 Distribution Wyckoff 2026 https://t.co/H5dkZMdXJC

    161921029K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Waaaa le short squeeze de l’enfer ! 😭 RIP mon short au passage. J’avais pas mis une grosse size -993$, mais bon, j’ai quand mĂȘme fait office de liquiditĂ© pour le short squeeze 😕 On a sorti toutes les liquiditĂ©s des anciens plus hauts : 68-70k, 74k et 78k $. Il ne manque plus que le dernier plus haut Ă  82-83k $. J’ai tellement hĂąte de voir la clĂŽture weekly de cette semaine. On va peut-ĂȘtre avoir un bottom de bear market plus tĂŽt que prĂ©vu 👀 Pour l’instant, ce n’est pas encore gagnĂ© tant qu’on ne casse pas la tendance baissiĂšre weekly. Par contre, si on clĂŽture au-dessus du ruban et du plus haut weekly Ă  82k $, lĂ  on pourra parler d’un retournement de tendance weekly et d’un Ă©ventuel bottom Ă  58k $.

    151621138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Imaginez, on fait une div baissiĂšre en daily comme en mars 2023, lors de la sortie du bear market sur BTC. On fake la premiĂšre correction, on dĂ©colle chercher le 2ᔉ top, puis boom, on chute, on rĂ©cupĂšre les FVG avant de repartir. https://t.co/BTDT62SfXh

    1451110188K viewsView on X
  • Nov 21, 2025

    Une Ă©norme PURGE est Ă  venir les amis. En 2021, les projets se sont gavĂ©s comme jamais. MalgrĂ© ça, on a vu en 2022 pas mal de faillites pendant le bear pour ceux qui n’avaient plus de revenus pour survivre. Depuis 2023, trĂšs peu de teams ont fait de l’argent, trĂšs peu de TGE ont rĂ©ussi Ă  se maintenir et la majoritĂ© des projets vivent sous assistance respiratoire en attendant “le bullrun” pour respirer un grand coup. Le problĂšme : ce moment-lĂ  n’est pas arrivĂ©, et ça va s'empirer Ă  court-terme. Et vu l’état du marchĂ©, les users capitulent, et les projets vont pas tarder Ă  capituler Ă©galement, je m’attends Ă  une Ă©norme hĂ©catombe dans les prochaines semaines. D’ici fĂ©vrier, beaucoup de projets vont mettre la clĂ© sous la porte, avant mĂȘme que la liquiditĂ© ne revienne et que la capitulation ne se termine.

    128622147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Enfin un peu de mouvement sur BTC ! On vient de sortir toutes les liquiditĂ©s Ă  68-70k $ qu’on regardait tous depuis des mois. La FVG daily est enfin comblĂ©e, je suis en short sur BTC. https://t.co/YQJbo0DwUr

    128414126K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 568 interactions, about 2.9x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Crypto Futur's engagement rate on X?
Crypto Futur (@crypto_futur) has an engagement rate of 0.071%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,192 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.071%, Crypto Futur sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @crypto_futur have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @crypto_futur post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going