Crypto Futur engagement report
@crypto_futur - 272K followers on X
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 568 interactions, about 2.9x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitcoin.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.071%, Crypto Futur sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Nov 24, 20252.9x their median
Je pense quâon a plus de chances de partir en bear market que de relancer le bull run ! Voici pourquoi : 1/ Niveau macro-Ă©conomie : â On peut avoir un rebond du marchĂ© avec un regain dâespoir grĂące Ă la baisse des taux de dĂ©cembre qui risque de se valider. Mais ce seul catalyseur ne suffira pas Ă garder le marchĂ© haussier. Surtout si la FED baisse les taux en dĂ©cembre, elle risque dâannoncer de la prudence pour dĂ©but 2026 et ne pas se prĂ©cipiter Ă enchaĂźner les baisses des taux. â Le QT se finit le 1/12/2025 et tout le monde est bullish pour le prochain QE, mais historiquement le QE met 6 Ă 18 mois Ă se lancer. Dans les conditions Ă©conomiques actuelles, un QE qui arrive au bout de 6â12 mois, donc fin 2026, serait plutĂŽt logique. Et 6â12 mois câest long ! On a le temps de se taper un bear market, surtout si le top Ă©tait dĂ©but octobre. â MĂȘme si tout le monde sâenjaille sur la liquiditĂ© globale qui devrait arriver avec la fin du QT dĂ©but 2026, jâai quelques doutes. Je pense que les attentes du marchĂ© sur cette liquiditĂ© sont trop hautes par rapport Ă la rĂ©alitĂ©. â Ă ne pas oublier aussi, les marchĂ©s traditionnels sont sur des plus hauts historiques, et le dollar pose progressivement son bottom en weekly. Pour moi, dĂ©but et mi-2026 restent trop bearish niveau macro pour avoir un nouvel ATH sur les cryptos. Par contre, fin 2026 sâannonce bien plus optimiste avec le dĂ©but du QE, et ça coĂŻnciderait pile avec la fin du bear market aprĂšs un an de baisse. 2/ Niveau technique : â Un dead cat bounce vers 96â100k$, pile sur les 0.382 de fibo, avec le retest du ruban weekly et la zone de liquidations de shorts Ă cet endroit, me paraĂźt parfait pour poser un rebond avant un bear market. â Le gros signal qui me fait peur aussi, câest le croisement bearish du MACD en mensuel. Ă chaque fois quâon lâa eu (juillet 2018 et janvier 2022), on Ă©tait sur les phases de dead cat bounce avant le bear market. Et lĂ , pour la premiĂšre fois depuis le dĂ©but du bull run, le mois de novembre risque de valider ce croisement bearish du MACD. â Dernier point pour la target du bear market, on risque de baisser pendant une bonne annĂ©e, jusquâĂ fin 2026, et revenir au 0.786 de fibo quâon vient chercher Ă chaque bear market, autour des 40k$. Ma zone dâachat commencera Ă 60k$ jusquâĂ 40k$, et tout ce quâil y a en dessous des 40k$ sera pour moi la zone de bottom Ă acheter Ă fond. Câest historiquement lĂ oĂč on a toujours fait nos bottoms en dessous des 0.786 de fibo (2011, 2015, 2018, 2022).
- Sep 1, 20262.6x their median
Ya que moi que ça choque les liq Ă 62-60k$ ? On Ă©tait tous choquĂ©s quand on a break les 68k et quâil y avait +3B$ de liquidations avec le giga short squeeze. Maintenant, regardez la diffĂ©rence de volume entre les liq Ă 68k et celles Ă 62k$. Si on vient chercher cette zone 62-60k$, ça va ĂȘtre entre 5-10B$ de liquidations long quâon va sortir.
- Aug 30, 2026
Ăa pourrait ĂȘtre terrifiant de faire une distribution Wyckoff juste en dessous des 82k $, pour retourner chercher la monstrueuse zone de liquiditĂ© Ă 62k $. https://t.co/077c65vFIc
- Sep 14, 2026
Je maintiens le mĂȘme scĂ©nario sur BTC : Eange deviation, break par le bas pour combler la FVG weekly/daily, voire sortir la poche de liquiditĂ© Ă 62k, avant de repartir. https://t.co/5kObO3X2kK
- Sep 3, 2026
Câest dommage pour hier. On aurait pu enfoncer le support des 76k $ et valider la figure de distribution Ă la baisse, ça aurait Ă©tĂ© propre. Les acheteurs sont encore trop forts, on a inversĂ© la tendance en H1, câest plutĂŽt mal parti. Ă voir comment on rĂ©agit dans la petite FVG H1 au-dessus, mais il y a des chances quâon vienne rĂ©cupĂ©rer les liquiditĂ©s sur les plus hauts Ă 81,5k $. MalgrĂ© ça, je reste toujours favorable Ă une baisse qui viendrait chercher les FVG weekly Ă 70k $ et surtout la monstrueuse zone de liquiditĂ© Ă 62k $.
- Sep 1, 2026
Distribution Wyckoff 2021 Distribution Wyckoff 2026 https://t.co/H5dkZMdXJC
- Aug 21, 2026
Waaaa le short squeeze de lâenfer ! đ RIP mon short au passage. Jâavais pas mis une grosse size -993$, mais bon, jâai quand mĂȘme fait office de liquiditĂ© pour le short squeeze đ On a sorti toutes les liquiditĂ©s des anciens plus hauts : 68-70k, 74k et 78k $. Il ne manque plus que le dernier plus haut Ă 82-83k $. Jâai tellement hĂąte de voir la clĂŽture weekly de cette semaine. On va peut-ĂȘtre avoir un bottom de bear market plus tĂŽt que prĂ©vu đ Pour lâinstant, ce nâest pas encore gagnĂ© tant quâon ne casse pas la tendance baissiĂšre weekly. Par contre, si on clĂŽture au-dessus du ruban et du plus haut weekly Ă 82k $, lĂ on pourra parler dâun retournement de tendance weekly et dâun Ă©ventuel bottom Ă 58k $.
- Sep 14, 2026
Imaginez, on fait une div baissiÚre en daily comme en mars 2023, lors de la sortie du bear market sur BTC. On fake la premiÚre correction, on décolle chercher le 2ᔠtop, puis boom, on chute, on récupÚre les FVG avant de repartir. https://t.co/BTDT62SfXh
- Nov 21, 2025
Une Ă©norme PURGE est Ă venir les amis. En 2021, les projets se sont gavĂ©s comme jamais. MalgrĂ© ça, on a vu en 2022 pas mal de faillites pendant le bear pour ceux qui nâavaient plus de revenus pour survivre. Depuis 2023, trĂšs peu de teams ont fait de lâargent, trĂšs peu de TGE ont rĂ©ussi Ă se maintenir et la majoritĂ© des projets vivent sous assistance respiratoire en attendant âle bullrunâ pour respirer un grand coup. Le problĂšme : ce moment-lĂ nâest pas arrivĂ©, et ça va s'empirer Ă court-terme. Et vu lâĂ©tat du marchĂ©, les users capitulent, et les projets vont pas tarder Ă capituler Ă©galement, je mâattends Ă une Ă©norme hĂ©catombe dans les prochaines semaines. Dâici fĂ©vrier, beaucoup de projets vont mettre la clĂ© sous la porte, avant mĂȘme que la liquiditĂ© ne revienne et que la capitulation ne se termine.
- Aug 19, 2026
Enfin un peu de mouvement sur BTC ! On vient de sortir toutes les liquiditĂ©s Ă 68-70k $ quâon regardait tous depuis des mois. La FVG daily est enfin comblĂ©e, je suis en short sur BTC. https://t.co/YQJbo0DwUr
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 272K followers, an engagement rate of 0.071%. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 29% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 568 interactions, about 2.9x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Crypto Futur's engagement rate on X?
- Crypto Futur (@crypto_futur) has an engagement rate of 0.071%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,192 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.071%, Crypto Futur sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @crypto_futur have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @crypto_futur post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.