Back to @crypto_birb's profile

₿IRB engagement report

@crypto_birb - 709K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 709K followers
Per impression
0.428%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
3.20%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 709K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #bitbasedailynews.

Compared with accounts its own size

₿IRB's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, ₿IRB sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 21, 202318x their median

    A trend and not a correction. From a technical standpoint, the bear market is over. #Bitcoin sees a persistent trend shift confirmed by price percentage traveled, volume spikes, above-the-average volatility, time above the 200-day trend, and improved breadth. In 2023, look up. https://t.co/wLf0lIvhsk

    991215412221.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202611x their median

    Who made this? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/PjuNxRzkqG

    950804415187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.5x their median

    I ADMIT MY $30,000 TARGET WRONG!!! Many of you have waited for this post so read it full. 1. This +25% breakout looks legit and strong enough to shift regime. Dropping full technical review later. 2. Unless a black swan crash like covid or ftx comes, $30k is rather unlikely. 3. I expected Q4 bottom but Q3 cycle low at $58k means bull market top will aim much higher. 2027 alone gains +216% on avg. Now some practical stuff you can use: Breakout area is 65k-69k, which will turn into support. If missed the rally place your bids there next month. We're nearing key bear market resistance at 80k. Vertical moves are not sustainable so fair to expect at least some quick consolidation in next days. Now will drop from here or above $80k? No idea. If I knew I wouldn't be typing this right now because I'd be busy jumping between my billionaire yachts. Looking back: Was $30k reasonable? Yes. Am I glad it's finally over? Yes. Did I sell 2025 top? Yes. Did I lose money in 2026 bear market? No. Was I wrong? It doesn't matter because I made money. Was Donald Trump wrong saying oil prices would go down? It doesn't matter - he made money. After a decade in the space, I've outlasted 99.99% haters, fake traders, KOL scammers, paid group leaders. Anyone can yap but when I challenge them to trade against me, they go quiet and vanish scared. If that's really new bull market starting (I hope so), next 3 years we'll make huge money. Trade with me here https://t.co/gboVqRXaQA

    6784918718229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.8x their median

    JUST IN: BITCOIN GOLDEN CROSS CONFIRMED! https://t.co/F3lQ14mnH2

    73766471041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.4x their median

    POV: You locked in 2026-2029 https://t.co/nVzhhTy2VP

    7861916441K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.3x their median

    Bear market is over. Last week my target was $30K. But evidence changed so my bias changed as fast. I'm a bull now. First few months can get you rekt easily. I've built this playbook so you can retire your family in 3 years. Thread🧵👇 https://t.co/AHaApzPOvx

    471598110121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.7x their median

    Jail these retards Sincerely, everyone https://t.co/qprIo6r4eH

    48514488123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.4x their median

    I don't know the future. But every time I'll see BTC pull back to SMA200 on the way up, I'll buy more. It's what I did in 2023-2025 which worked out well. Also deployed my first long-term buys last week in 77k-79k range. Will load heavier bag if we get near $70,000. Big IF. https://t.co/EtzVpmdwgU

    4554236140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20265.2x their median

    A typical October would take us to $98,700. That's right. It's fair to expect near $100k prices soon. Will we get there in 30 days? No clue, but Q4 is crazy. Average Q4 gains +19.17% in midterms and +45.26% overall. We can see $100k-$122k before 2026 ends. Isn't it great? https://t.co/soEAilYDSY

    4293933452K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20265.1x their median

    Someone needs to say this. Memecoin trading is worse than gambling. FOMO traders are down $1.26 BILLION in total. Out of 292,531 wallets only 6.16% are in profit. Median trader is down $120. Casinos give you better odds. You are the exit liquidity. https://t.co/ALU8463s6g

    36138861782K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitbasedailynews

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 709K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is ₿IRB's engagement rate on X?
₿IRB (@crypto_birb) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 709,233 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, ₿IRB sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @crypto_birb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @crypto_birb post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going