Back to @crypto_birb's profile

₿IRB engagement report

@crypto_birb - 713K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 713K followers
Per impression
0.396%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
3.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.73/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 713K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.396% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitbase, #bitcoin.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitbase, #bitcoin.

Compared with accounts its own size

₿IRB's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 29% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, ₿IRB sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Feb 21, 202318x their median

    A trend and not a correction. From a technical standpoint, the bear market is over. #Bitcoin sees a persistent trend shift confirmed by price percentage traveled, volume spikes, above-the-average volatility, time above the 200-day trend, and improved breadth. In 2023, look up. https://t.co/wLf0lIvhsk

    991215412221.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202610x their median

    I ADMIT MY $30,000 TARGET WRONG!!! Many of you have waited for this post so read it full. 1. This +25% breakout looks legit and strong enough to shift regime. Dropping full technical review later. 2. Unless a black swan crash like covid or ftx comes, $30k is rather unlikely. 3. I expected Q4 bottom but Q3 cycle low at $58k means bull market top will aim much higher. 2027 alone gains +216% on avg. Now some practical stuff you can use: Breakout area is 65k-69k, which will turn into support. If missed the rally place your bids there next month. We're nearing key bear market resistance at 80k. Vertical moves are not sustainable so fair to expect at least some quick consolidation in next days. Now will drop from here or above $80k? No idea. If I knew I wouldn't be typing this right now because I'd be busy jumping between my billionaire yachts. Looking back: Was $30k reasonable? Yes. Am I glad it's finally over? Yes. Did I sell 2025 top? Yes. Did I lose money in 2026 bear market? No. Was I wrong? It doesn't matter because I made money. Was Donald Trump wrong saying oil prices would go down? It doesn't matter - he made money. After a decade in the space, I've outlasted 99.99% haters, fake traders, KOL scammers, paid group leaders. Anyone can yap but when I challenge them to trade against me, they go quiet and vanish scared. If that's really new bull market starting (I hope so), next 3 years we'll make huge money. Trade with me here https://t.co/gboVqRXaQA

    6784918718229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20269.0x their median

    POV: You locked in 2026-2029 https://t.co/nVzhhTy2VP

    7861916441K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.8x their median

    Bear market is over. Last week my target was $30K. But evidence changed so my bias changed as fast. I'm a bull now. First few months can get you rekt easily. I've built this playbook so you can retire your family in 3 years. Thread🧵👇 https://t.co/AHaApzPOvx

    471598110121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20265.5x their median

    Someone needs to say this. Memecoin trading is worse than gambling. FOMO traders are down $1.26 BILLION in total. Out of 292,531 wallets only 6.16% are in profit. Median trader is down $120. Casinos give you better odds. You are the exit liquidity. https://t.co/ALU8463s6g

    36138861782K viewsView on X
  • Jan 13, 20234.9x their median

    $BTC BREAKING THE 200-DAY BEAR MARKET TREND https://t.co/XKsJwYiJpr

    39947335241K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.8x their median

    It's officially bull market. First weekly close above the SMA200 signals end of bear after -55% declines from Oct 2025 peak. Convergence surge in price, momentum, volatility, volume, and market breadth makes the reversal credible. Strong technical evidence. Bring it on. https://t.co/eCxxHpORhQ

    3424051531K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.6x their median

    Looks similar. https://t.co/qv780cI1C8

    3373641539K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    2027 will be fun https://t.co/lgwTRtIGc6

    3052732037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.9x their median

    Next Bitcoin halving in April 2028. Historically, price moved up even 6x from cycle low to halving. A more realistic expectation is 2.5x from market bottom. That means, baseline halving price can be $144,500. An aggressive target would be $231,200. Will we get there? No idea. https://t.co/BNCbDM9nnA

    3023227029K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitbase#bitcoin

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 713K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.396% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitbase, #bitcoin.

What is ₿IRB's engagement rate on X?
₿IRB (@crypto_birb) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 712,567 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, ₿IRB sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @crypto_birb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @crypto_birb post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going