Back to @cruzoeiro's profile

@CRUZOEIRO engagement report

@cruzoeiro - 137K followers on X

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.176%
of 137K followers
Per impression
2.49%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
7.05%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
241
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 241 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brasileirão, #corinthians, #futebol.

Measured over 54 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #brasileirão, #corinthians, #futebol.

Compared with accounts its own size

@CRUZOEIRO's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.176%, @CRUZOEIRO sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 253 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20264.6x their median

    🗞️ A torcida organizada Máfia Azul, realizou na noite desta terça-feira (22), uma reunião para esclarecer a situação atual do Cruzeiro e falar ao torcedor o posicionamento da organizada frente as decisões de protestos, cobranças e apoio ao clube, jogadores e diretoria, após receber duras críticas da torcida e ser chamada por muitos de “torcida comprada”. O canal Cruzoeiro não esteve presente por motivos pessoais mas estamos aqui para ajudar a divulgar o encontro e as principais falas na reunião. O canal Cruzeiro Sports, do Diogo Medeiros, trouxe um vídeo bem mais completo em suas rede sociais. O torcedor pode acompanhar e entender mais sobre o assunto.

    7862422376111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.4x their median

    Matheus Pereira e seu “novo” estilo, ainda mais platinado. https://t.co/T7xTHQJ7B8

    834817146191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20264.3x their median

    🗞️ Apenas 3 clubes da série A no futebol brasileiro já levaram mais de 1 milhão de torcedores em seus jogos. O Cruzeiro é um deles. O time da maior torcida de Minas Gerais tem um público total, em 27 jogos na temporada até o momento, de 1.018.029 torcedores. 📊 Somos Clubistas https://t.co/xypA6PeEsd

    9456332626K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.3x their median

    Uma boa Data Fifa e um abraço a todos! 🫂 https://t.co/Vauen07vE1

    1.0K152010.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.0x their median

    Geral discutindo de bet e o Matheus Pereira de boa com o mozão em Lisboa, Portugal 🇵🇹 📍 https://t.co/ojRnW9KGNO

    936916416K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.0x their median

    Com a proibição das bets, se você pudesse escolher uma marca para ser o patrocinador master do Cruzeiro, qual escolheria? 👀 https://t.co/UT05S9qzy5

    624102913983K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.6x their median

    William entrou e melhorou MUITO o lado direito de campo. Os dois gols sairam com participação dele. Felipe Morais também preencheu melhor o meio campo. Villalba raça na esquerda. Tem gente no banco querendo jogar, beleza Artur Jorge?

    7981644213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.2x their median

    Hoje o Artur Jorge viu quem tava mal em campo e mudou corretamente. Não esperou demais. É isso que tem que ser e que faltou em alguns outros jogos recentes. Tem que parar de ser pragmático, tem que ousar também. Fodas se jogador vai achar ruim, e nem tem que achar, quem manda no jogo é o técnico.

    7452610011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.9x their median

    Assim ficou a classificação do Campeonato Brasileiro com os resultados da 28ª rodada. Em qual posição está o seu time? #futebol #brasileirão #ge https://t.co/8VSuJu8XIn

    62934141049K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.8x their median

    Por que @adidasbrasil? Por que você não olha pro @Cruzeiro igual olha para outros clubes que têm seus materiais? Cadê a linha EQT do Cabuloso? 😭😓 https://t.co/9MgwCADWBC

    630640543K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brasileirão#corinthians#futebol#futebolnaespn#ge

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 241 interactions against 137K followers, an engagement rate of 0.176%. Measured over 54 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 54 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 4.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brasileirão, #corinthians, #futebol.

What is @CRUZOEIRO's engagement rate on X?
@CRUZOEIRO (@cruzoeiro) has an engagement rate of 0.176%, based on the median interactions across 54 original posts from the last 30 days against 136,846 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.176%, @CRUZOEIRO sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cruzoeiro have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cruzoeiro post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going