Back to @cristinagraeml's profile

Cristina Graeml engagement report

@cristinagraeml - 639K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.178%
of 639K followers
Per impression
5.40%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
3.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 639K followers, an engagement rate of 0.178%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 5.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #coerência, #cristinagraeml, #verdade.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #coerência, #cristinagraeml, #verdade.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cristina Graeml's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.178%, Cristina Graeml sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 202611x their median

    O quanto é preciso ser OTÁRIO para acreditar em qualquer coisa que o Descondenado fale? Esse sujeito é o símbolo máximo do colapso moral do país. https://t.co/uBKIKrCR83

    10K1.8K31668204K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20268.0x their median

    Precisa desenhar? São todos unidos contra @jairbolsonaro , seus filhos e o povo. O apito já foi tocado lá atrás! https://t.co/SW2GofePEn

    6.6K2.2K21261226K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20267.5x their median

    And here it is… USAID more than doubled its spending on Brazil as soon as Bolsonaro won the 2018 election. This wasn’t because Brazil suddenly needed twice the aid; the money was spent on operations aimed at overthrowing the Brazilian government. The 2022 Brazilian election was stolen from Bolsonaro just as the 2020 U.S. election was stolen from Donald Trump and from Kari Lake in 2022, with USAID and the CIA involved in installing election-rigging machines that Brazilians didn’t even want. Just months before the election, CIA Director William Burns visited Brazil and warned Bolsonaro not to cast doubt on the voting machines or contest the election results — implying the newly installed machines were compromised. Additionally, Defense Secretary Lloyd “Woke” Austin — a DEI hire — visited Brazil and pressured the Chief of the Brazilian Armed Forces to accept the election results and support Lula, a convicted felon and self-proclaimed communist. How’s that for election interference? In other words, the overthrow of the U.S. government overthrew the Brazilian government via USAID — all at the expense of the American taxpayer. 📝 By the way, @MikeBenzCyber is the news.

    5.7K2.7K10091136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.0x their median

    Por anos, fomos chamados de negacionistas por pedir apenas respostas. Agora, o próprio diário de Anthony Fauci revela o que ele sabia e escondia enquanto orientava o mundo inteiro: sobre as máscaras, sobre a hidroxicloroquina, sobre os efeitos da vacina que ele mesmo tomou. Diante do Senado americano, diante de perguntas simples, ele preferiu o silêncio e invocou a Quinta Emenda cento e onze vezes. A verdade é teimosa. Pode demorar a aparecer, mas sempre vem à tona. #Fauci #Covid19 #Ciência #MédicosPelaVida

    3.6K875811832K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.7x their median

    O PT foi à Procuradoria-Geral da República pedir uma investigação sobre a presença de Javier Milei na convenção que oficializou Flávio Bolsonaro como candidato à Presidência. A acusação é de interferência estrangeira. Só que, em entrevista à Rádio Mitre, o próprio Milei apresentou números que colocam essa acusação em xeque: segundo ele, o governo brasileiro financiou 25% de uma campanha contra a Argentina nas eleições de 2023, e os assessores do candidato Sergio Massa eram, em sua maioria, brasileiros. Há ainda outro detalhe que expõe a incoerência do discurso: Milei pediu para visitar Jair Bolsonaro, em prisão domiciliar, e o pedido foi negado por Alexandre de Moraes. Um ano antes, Lula havia atravessado a fronteira para visitar Cristina Kirchner, também presa, sem qualquer restrição. Assista até o final e conte nos comentários o que você pensa sobre essa dupla régua. #cristinagraeml #milei #lula

    3.4K77045761K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.3x their median

    Janja pediu, em público, o bloqueio imediato do Discord no Brasil. Horas depois, a Advocacia-Geral da União já anunciou que vai à Justiça atrás disso. O motivo é um crime real e gravíssimo, o abuso de uma menina de treze anos transmitido ao vivo para centenas de pessoas, e sobre isso não deve haver dúvida: quem cometeu esse crime precisa ser identificado, processado e preso. Mas banir uma plataforma inteira não é justiça, é atalho. O criminoso migra em minutos; quem fica prejudicado são os milhões de brasileiros que usam o Discord para trabalhar, estudar e empreender. E chama atenção que essa mesma urgência nunca aparece quando o assunto é celular dentro de presídio comandando facção, ou quando o assunto é a menina abusada numa periferia longe das câmeras. Ninguém que não foi eleita tem o direito de decidir o que duzentos milhões de brasileiros podem acessar. O papel do Estado é prender criminosos, não calar plataformas para disfarçar a própria incompetência. #cristinagraeml #liberdadedeexpressão #combateaocrime

    3.0K616921361K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.6x their median

    Lula provocou o secretário de Estado americano e recebeu uma resposta que ultrapassou qualquer limite diplomático. O deputado Carlos Giménez, nascido em Cuba, chamou o presidente de porco corrupto e criminoso e publicou uma montagem com o rosto dele no lugar do de Maduro, capturado pelos Estados Unidos em janeiro. Não há ameaça oficial da Casa Branca, mas o episódio mostra até onde a diplomacia de provocação de Lula está levando o Brasil. #cristinagraeml #diplomacia #brasil #eua

    2.5K48737635K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.5x their median

    Lembra da promessa de que, com Lula, o brasileiro voltaria a comer picanha, se vestir bem e viajar de avião? 🤔 Pois é. Agora é hora de olhar para os números e comparar a promessa com a realidade. Informação de verdade não precisa de propaganda. Precisa de fatos, dados e jornalismo sério. Valorize a imprensa e os jornalistas que têm compromisso com a verdade. #cristinagraeml #jornalismo #verdade

    2.3K50543731K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20262.5x their median

    A mais nova bravata internacional do desgoverno Lula já está nas manchetes dos principais jornais do mundo. Ao negar visto p dois funcionários do Depto de Estado americano virem ao Brasil discutir a integridade do sistema eleitoral, Lula conseguiu manchetes no Washington Post, New York Times, Financial Times e Agência Bloomberg, entre outros. O Itamaraty alega temer que a visita fosse usada p “disseminar desinformação”. Tomou uma invertida sem precedentes. O Depto de Estado dos EUA chamou o governo Lula de mentiroso. Fato que a imprensa mundial destacou: fechar a porta p observadores estrangeiros às vésperas da eleição coloca o sistema eleitoral do Brasil definitivamente em cheque. Se as urnas são confiáveis, como o PT insiste em afirmar, por que autoridades de fora não podem sequer conversar com integrantes do TSE? https://t.co/phylhSuR5z

    2.2K51657926K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.2x their median

    Deu ruim, hein? Até o Datafolha está escancarando a tirania do STF! Pesquisa diz que 59% dos brasileiros acham que Moraes agiu mal ao proibir Flávio de visitar o pai preso; apenas 36% aprovam. O ministro insiste em transformar a vida de uma família em instrumento de castigo político. A população já percebeu que isso não tem nada a ver com Justiça.  https://t.co/oOBRPbH0Ne

    2.1K36350242K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#coerência#cristinagraeml#verdade

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 639K followers, an engagement rate of 0.178%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 5.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #coerência, #cristinagraeml, #verdade.

What is Cristina Graeml's engagement rate on X?
Cristina Graeml (@cristinagraeml) has an engagement rate of 0.178%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 638,552 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.178%, Cristina Graeml sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cristinagraeml have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cristinagraeml post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going