Back to @cristianritondo's profile

Cristian Ritondo engagement report

@cristianritondo - 290K followers on X

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.048%
of 290K followers
Per impression
1.97%
7.0K views on a typical post
Reach
2.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
138
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 6 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 450x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 6 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, Cristian Ritondo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video17% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 17% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 244 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 27, 2026450x their median

    La Justicia de EE.UU. falló a favor de YPF y deja en evidencia años de mentiras. Al final, era un relato impulsado por los buitres para cuestionar una decisión soberana y hacerse (más) ricos. Mientras el presidente Javier Milei hablaba del “impuesto Kicillof”, los propios abogados del Estado argentino, desde que se inició el juicio, defendían en la Justicia los mismos argumentos que sostuvimos siempre. Ese “impuesto” nunca fue más que una operación: un coro de voces que repitió durante años los argumentos de los buitres, instalando que la nacionalización había sido técnicamente incorrecta. ¿Era desconocimiento, ingenuidad o una mentira interesada? Hoy queda claro. No se trataba de atacarme a mí, sino de cuestionar una decisión soberana y de defender intereses extranjeros. La derecha nunca la habría nacionalizado. Trabajaron siempre para los buitres, pero paradójicamente hoy su modelo no colapsa por falta de dólares gracias a YPF. Milei se disfraza con el mameluco de YPF, pero nunca la defendió: actuó como empleado de intereses extranjeros. Nacionalizar YPF fue una de las decisiones estratégicas más importantes de la Argentina en las últimas décadas. Hoy es una palanca de desarrollo del país y resulta clave para atenuar el impacto de la crisis energética global. Aquella decisión, adoptada por @CFKArgentina marca el rumbo del modelo de desarrollo que la Argentina necesita: defensa del interés nacional, desarrollo federal, articulación público-privada, inversión en ciencia e infraestructura, potencial industrial, producción y cuidado de nuestros recursos naturales. Se hizo justicia. Los buitres no siempre ganan. YPF es de los argentinos. El futuro también.

    47K13K02.0K2.8M viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 2026309x their median

    https://t.co/q3g4QLzODl

    32K9.3K4195971.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 202555x their median

    Menos regulación, más exportación. Walter cultivó sandías toda su vida. Hoy, gracias a la desregulación, pudo llevar su trabajo más allá de nuestras fronteras. Celebramos que las barreras eliminadas se conviertan en oportunidades para los argentinos. https://t.co/hVW6rWJlp8

    14K2.6K206102408K viewsView on X
  • Nov 13, 202531x their median

    https://t.co/Ej7WYKxOYK

    7.9K1.3K3392142.5M viewsView on X
  • Mar 31, 202663x their median

    Podés repetir la misma mentira mil veces… pero la realidad te la chiflan en vivo. SE LES TERMINÓ EL RELATO. https://t.co/gPMwjpbqFk

    6.4K1.7K5997899K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 202517x their median

    ELECCIÓN HISTÓRICA EN LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES! https://t.co/25EUkHnULZ

    6.5K7231332585K viewsView on X
  • Nov 2, 202518x their median

    Más de 35 años de amistad y de trabajo compartido. Orgullo verte asumir este nuevo desafío como Ministro del Interior, Diego. Sos un gran dirigente del PRO y, sobre todo, una gran persona. No tengo dudas de que vas a dejar todo de vos para hacer una excelente tarea, como lo hiciste en cada desafío que tuviste. Te deseo lo mejor en esta etapa, amigo querido!

    4.6K47837941209K viewsView on X
  • Nov 11, 202511x their median

    Felicitaciones amigo, es un orgullo que un dirigente del PRO con tu experiencia y capacidad ocupe un lugar tan importante para ayudar a lograr los cambios que Argentina necesita. A fondo! https://t.co/yPdnPKceeA

    2.5K25454752110K viewsView on X
  • Oct 27, 20255.9x their median

    Hay equipo! @diegosantilli @gmontenegro_ok https://t.co/pHnANKXR5a

    2.1K2441021728K viewsView on X
  • Feb 20, 202618x their median

    Hoy dimos un paso fundamental para que vuelva a crecer el empleo privado en la Argentina. EL CAMBIO AVANZA. https://t.co/KpBmht7z5p

    1.7K1984645134K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 138 interactions against 290K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 1.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 6 posts sampled, 17% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 450x its own typical post. Only 6 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Cristian Ritondo's engagement rate on X?
Cristian Ritondo (@cristianritondo) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 6 original posts from the last 30 days against 289,501 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, Cristian Ritondo sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cristianritondo have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @cristianritondo post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going