Back to @crfannajuu's profile

anna¹⁸⁹⁵ engagement report

@crfannajuu - 998 followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2950.6%
of 998 followers
Per impression
11.6%
254K views on a typical post
Reach
25468.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
29K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.183%
464 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 29K interactions against 998 followers, an engagement rate of 2950.6%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 15,824 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 254K times each, and 11.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25468.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

anna¹⁸⁹⁵'s engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,824 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 1 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2950.6%, anna¹⁸⁹⁵ sits above the 99th percentile of the 159,795 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 1% band, which runs 82.5% and above.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.606%
p902.33%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 159,795 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,796 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.606%
90th percentile2.33%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 168 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 20264.5x their median

    o curioso caso do governo lula onde tudo tá caro e o povo tá sem dinheiro, mas você sai na rua e tem 5 byd por metro quadrado

    112K18K1.2K1.2K1.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    A trabalhadora que a esquerda humilhou o dia inteiro deixou um recadinho 😊: https://t.co/VQxIudB76P

    28K5.3K1.4K1.3K2.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    O cara veio discutir comigo e ele disse: "o bolsonaro revolucionou o brasil" E eu falei: "Revolucionou tanto q sua irmã virou estatística na pandemia" https://t.co/hMn0tcNnnP

    30K3.1K184125183K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    o lula ter ganhado na zona sul inteira do rio e o bolsonaro na zona norte me irritou tanto juro eu quero tacar uma bomba nesse estado

    27K3.8K151374326K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    grwm pro enterro https://t.co/Z0pEZf0Pfk

    23K4.7K3047108K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 2026

    Flávio Bolsonaro defende restrições ao Carnaval de rua no Rio de Janeiro, com propostas que atingem diretamente blocos, baterias e festas realizadas nas ruas. A medida pode prejudicar ambulantes, comerciantes e trabalhadores que dependem da movimentação gerada pela folia para garantir renda durante o Carnaval. Além de ser uma das principais festas do país, o Carnaval movimenta uma extensa cadeia de empregos temporários e atividades comerciais. Em 2026, a CNC estimou que a folia geraria 39,2 mil vagas temporárias no país.

    19K4.8K1.8K1.9K708K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    a culpa eh do lula que nao fechou as igrejas tinha que ter bombardeado a sede da lagoinha batista assembleia as católicas q apoiam essa familia de anti cristo foda seeee

    15K3.7K762126K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 2026

    Eu sacrifico o país ao Flávio Bolsonaro pra ter o Eduardo Paes governado

    3.8K585428589K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 29K interactions against 998 followers, an engagement rate of 2950.6%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 100% of 15,824 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 254K times each, and 11.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25468.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.

What is anna¹⁸⁹⁵'s engagement rate on X?
anna¹⁸⁹⁵ (@crfannajuu) has an engagement rate of 2950.6%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 998 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2950.6%, anna¹⁸⁹⁵ sits above the 99th percentile of the 159,795 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @crfannajuu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 100% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,824 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @crfannajuu post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going