Back to @creo_engine's profile

Creo Engine engagement report

@creo_engine - 114K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.124%
of 114K followers
Per impression
2.13%
6.7K views on a typical post
Reach
5.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
143
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 143 interactions against 114K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 2.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video, 67% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 222 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Creo Engine's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.124%, Creo Engine sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 523 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 20261.6x their median

    The new Creo Engine Whitepaper is out! As we continue building, we are also keeping the foundation of the ecosystem up to date. This latest update includes the revised circulating supply and a deeper look at CreoPlay AI, our next step toward making game creation more accessible through AI.

    14841201317K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20261.5x their median

    New look. New intelligence. Incoming. ๐Ÿ‘€Something new is taking shape at Creo Engine. Behind the scenes, weโ€™re rebuilding our digital home to reflect the next evolution of Creo Engine, with a sharper identity, a more refined experience, and a stronger foundation for the future of games, creation, and AI-powered experiences. This is more than a website revamp. It is a reflection of where Creo Engine is heading next. As the ecosystem continues to evolve, so does the way we present what we are building, how everything connects, and the vision shaping the next chapter of Creo Engine. What youโ€™re seeing today is only a first glimpse. The new website is still being developed and refined ahead of the full reveal, with more to come across the experience, ecosystem, and products we are building toward. As the market gears up for the ultimate run, we arenโ€™t just preparing for the wave. Weโ€™re engineering the future it rides on. The new era is loading. Stay tuned for the drop!

    1474518911K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    This familiar game started as a single phrase. A prompt simple enough to begin the process: "Create a Flappy Bird-style game." With CreoPlay AI, that prompt becomes more than just text. It becomes the starting point for building something playable. The system helps turn the idea into game structure, mechanics, and logic, so the result is not just generated, but something you can test, refine, and continue improving. This is the direction we are building toward with CreoPlay AI. Not just generating a game, but creating a workflow where creators can start with an idea, shape the experience, test the result, and keep building from there. Today, it starts with a "Flappy Bird-style" game. Tomorrow, it'll start with YOUR idea. CreoPlay AI. From prompt to playable.

    1012623612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    ๐€ ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ ๐‚๐š๐ง ๐’๐ญ๐š๐ซ๐ญ ๐š ๐–๐จ๐ซ๐ฅ๐. Welcome to CreoPlay AI, built for the next generation of game creators. A simple idea can become a playable experience, giving developers, designers, storytellers, and communities an easier way to bring concepts to life. CreoPlay AI puts creation first: The platform is designed to reduce the barriers between an idea and a working game, making experimentation faster and more accessible. But creation is only the beginning.

    972626615K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    $CREO ๐จ๐ง ๐’๐จ๐ฅ๐š๐ง๐š: ๐‚๐จ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐œ๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐€๐œ๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ข๐ง๐ฌ! Multichain access was built to give Creotizens more flexibility in how and where they interact with CREO. On @solana , CREO is available through @Raydium , giving you a decentralized way to trade directly within the Solana ecosystem. It means another access point to CREO without being limited to a single network, more flexibility in managing assets across chains, and the ability to access CREO directly through Solanaโ€™s on-chain trading ecosystem. CreoPlay AI represents the next step for the ecosystem, while multichain access continues to support how users connect with $CREO.

    108261313.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    ๐๐ž๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ๐ž ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ซ ๐ ๐š๐ฆ๐ž๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ž๐ง๐ญ ๐จ๐ง๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ž, ๐ฉ๐ž๐จ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฐ๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐š๐ฅ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐๐ฒ ๐ ๐š๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐š๐ซ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐›๐จ๐š๐ซ๐! Monopoly became commercially available through Parker Brothers in 1935, turning buying properties, collecting rent, and competing with friends into a multiplayer experience that would continue across generations. ๐ŸŽฒThe board may have changed. The way we create games is changing too. Today, an idea for a Monopoly-style game can start with something much simpler: a prompt!

    10728846.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    The next chapter of $CREO is already taking shape! Over the past weeks, weโ€™ve been sharing more about where the CREO ecosystem is heading. At the center of that direction is CreoPlay AI, our next step toward making game creation more accessible by helping creators turn an idea into something playable, testable, and continuously improvable. โš ๏ธ A quick reminder for the community: if youโ€™re trading CREO, always use established platforms such as @BingXOfficial , @MEXC , @Gate , and other supported exchanges. We appreciate everyone who continues to support CREO and follow what weโ€™re building next!

    102261515.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    Everything starts with something simple. A prompt. But the prompt is only the beginning. CreoPlay AI is built to take an idea further, helping turn a prompt into something you can play, test, and keep refining. Different ideas. Different games. The same starting point. Describe what you want to create, then build from there. This is the direction we are building toward with CreoPlay AI. From prompt to playable!

    922917511K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    How many of you remember the legendary "Snake" game from the Symbian era? What if you could prompt your own? Meet the Snake game, powered by CreoPlay AI. Simply describe the game you want, generate the first playable version, test how it feels, and refine it from there. ๐ˆ๐๐ž๐š โ†’ ๐๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐ โ†’ ๐๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ That is the workflow we are building. And the next prompt could lead somewhere completely different. That is what makes building games with CreoPlay AI so exciting. The prompt gives you a starting point, what you build from it is entirely up to you.

    95251459.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Remember Whack-a-Mole? The goal is simple: hit the mole before it disappears. Each successful hit adds to your score while the timer keeps running. Simple mechanics, quick reactions, and a challenge that gets harder as you play. https://t.co/vSliSd6u8K

    90231444.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 143 interactions against 114K followers, an engagement rate of 0.124%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 2.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video, 67% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 222 interactions, about 1.6x its own typical post.

What is Creo Engine's engagement rate on X?
Creo Engine (@creo_engine) has an engagement rate of 0.124%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 113,581 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.124%, Creo Engine sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @creo_engine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @creo_engine post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going