Back to @cremieuxrecueil's profile

Crémieux engagement report

@cremieuxrecueil - 334K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.252%
of 334K followers
Per impression
1.28%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
19.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
837
interactions (median)
Saved
0.184%
120 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.5/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 837 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Crémieux's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.252%, Crémieux sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 263 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202632x their median

    Reading about 9/11, and I’d never heard this part of the story. What the hell https://t.co/xp3OJHj5xV

    25K1.3K2382061.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.1x their median

    Wokeness didn't end Nature just put out an editorial praising Jason Arday, affirming the lie he was autistic & arguing he had an unmet right to see the evidence against him and respond accordingly They argued that didn't happen, even though we all saw it These people are liars https://t.co/K0ceMdjbgk

    3.8K295832374K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.0x their median

    Bernie Sanders and Greg Casar today announced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act. All AI development in the United States will be paused. Systems that have capabilities that match or exceed human cognitive performance will be banned. Violators will face 20 years in prison. https://t.co/B6AhM3GiZl

    2.3K227988691601K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.8x their median

    JUST IN: A Virgina AI data center generates $26 in tax revenue for every $1 of county services they use while occupying just 3% of the land.

    3.6K27015446235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.7x their median

    Dan Ariely keeps getting caught doing fraud in increasingly obvious ways and nothing ever happens. He still holds a professorship at Duke. They just don't seem to care. https://t.co/GKRfChzTfL

    2.8K238752398K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20253.4x their median

    What comes after GLP-1RAs make everyone skinny? What comes after myostatin inhibitors make everyone buff? One new candidate is: Safe, cheap, and easily-administered injections that locally remove fat. A new drug that just passed through phase 2 seems to do just that🧵 https://t.co/SWlxBOmwiq

    2.5K17011336626K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.9x their median

    "Nonplussed" is one of the worst words in English because its modern meaning and its original meaning are opposites. https://t.co/7qlUIdgQ7a

    1.9K6042372166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    It's really annoying that, practically speaking, AirBnB ratings range between 4.5 and 4.99 and anything below that is some sort of hell on earth. https://t.co/Emp7K39h1j

    2.1K371122178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    We have data on the prices things have sold for in government auctions. Lots of neat stuff goes for shockingly cheap. Here are some interesting examples: https://t.co/LDLzwAF4Xb

    1.2K2329565K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    It's a shame that venison is no longer safe to eat in so much of the country. https://t.co/eaHYh3Nbxt

    1.0K199821161K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 837 interactions against 334K followers, an engagement rate of 0.252%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is Crémieux's engagement rate on X?
Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) has an engagement rate of 0.252%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 333,839 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.252%, Crémieux sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cremieuxrecueil have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cremieuxrecueil post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) Engagement Rate - 0.252% | PlayerSells