Back to @creation247's profile

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ engagement report

@creation247 - 358K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 358K followers
Per impression
1.42%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
162
interactions (median)
Saved
0.07%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.87/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 358K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 170x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 256 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026170x their median

    Can you spot the difference? https://t.co/9sGkN0RwZU

    25K1.8K31447210K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 202632x their median

    I donโ€™t think I will ever understand this particular sceneโ€ฆ https://t.co/UHSVvRm5rZ

    10K3821.6K1.2K32M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202671x their median

    Bugshan Palace is a reminder that Yemen should be known to the world for its extraordinary architectural civilization, not only for the conflicts that dominate its modern image. https://t.co/4LSnU4taam

    9.9K1.4K10643453K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202668x their median

    Today is the day the Winged Hussars saved Christian Europe. They saved Viena, and Europe at large, from being conquered by the Ottoman empire with their legendary charge. "Venimus, Vidimus, Deus vicit" (We came, we saw, God conquered). https://t.co/sx2Kuczbh5

    9.5K1.4K8554630K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202663x their median

    Time to address the elephant in the room: No self-respecting man would like to play as an empowered, annoying 2/10 Latina in Grand Theft Auto. This is lame and woke. https://t.co/dgIVoT5Pf2

    7.2K3161.9K8125.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202639x their median

    โ€œBeauty will save the day.โ€ - Fyodor Dostoevsky https://t.co/fIElfHIOUf

    5.5K724353478K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202629x their median

    Karl Marx failed to consider how awesome it is to be Christian and have 8 kids. https://t.co/xEhMTu90E2

    4.4K310691666K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202628x their median

    Reasons Iโ€™m concerned GTA VI will be bad. โ€ขDan Houser left in 2020 and confirmed he wrote none of GTA 6, ending the main narrative voice of the series since the late 1990s. โ€ขPublic writing credit shifted to Rupert Humphries (SVP of narrative) and Michael Wiafe, not the old Houser-led room. โ€ขNewer associate writers tied to the project have TV-comedy backgrounds (Brooklyn 99, Veep / The Thick of It, Disney), a different pipeline than classic GTA radio satire. โ€ขBloomberg (2022): Rockstar overhauled itself after RDR2 crunch from a โ€œboysโ€™ clubโ€ into a more progressive, woke, HR-conscious company. โ€ขSame reporting: the next GTA would avoid โ€œpunching down,โ€ drop old misogynistic shortcuts, and use a Latina woman in a Bonnie-and-Clyde pair. โ€ขBloomberg (2024): management told GTA 6 writers to be โ€œless crudeโ€ toward trans people and other minorities who used to be throwaway gag targets. โ€ขGTA 5โ€™s current-gen rerelease already removed some of those jokes after pressure from an industry LGBT group. โ€ขRockstar has said older GTAs were criticized for thin/sexist women and that they want to attract more female players so theyโ€™re making women more ugly on purpose. โ€ขThe story is built around a couple with the man taking the backseat, not a lone antihero or a trio of separate men. โ€ขOfficial framing: Lucia is the first fully realized female lead; she is often treated as the driver of the pair. โ€ขJason is publicly described as lower-ambition, waiting on Lucia, scraping by, reactive in a lot of the shown footage. Trying to appease the woman. โ€ขMarketing and previews lean on domestic/relationship beats (dress choice, hand-holding, โ€œsteward of their relationshipโ€). โ€ขRomance is optional in systems, but the plot still forces them to stay partners for most of the story. โ€ขNelsonโ€™s line: โ€œIn this world, youโ€™re not a Godโ€ โ€” less consequence-free chaos, more reactive NPCs/police/story attachment. โ€ขRockstar wants the couple relationship to stay central. โ€ขTake-Two/Rockstar became more leak-scarred, PR-conscious, and risk-averse during a 10+ year development cycle. โ€ขThe company is much larger than pre-2013 Rockstar; more layers of approval sit on jokes, sex, and politics. โ€ขSatire is frowned upon unlike old GTA jokes due to pressure from activist groups; the safe move is to soften some targets and put emotion in the middle. This is Grand Theft Auto in name only like the upcoming Witcher, recent 007, new gears of war, new halo games, etcโ€ฆ

    4.1K31514134536K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202626x their median

    Repeat after me: Men don't play girl boss trash. Men don't watch girl boss trash. Men don't read girl boss trash. Men don't listen to girl boss trash. https://t.co/fUiyRf2Kqd

    3.8K1941561736K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202624x their median

    https://t.co/XNb2UYKbmb

    3.7K20717749K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 358K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 170x its own typical post.

What is ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate on X?
๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@creation247) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 357,932 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐€๐ซ๐ญ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ž ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @creation247 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @creation247 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going