Back to @creapills's profile

Creapills 💊 engagement report

@creapills - 162K followers on X

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 162K followers
Per impression
0.857%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.086%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 58 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Creapills 💊's engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Creapills 💊 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 366 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 202636x their median

    Il a vraiment le nez pour dĂ©crocher les meilleurs rĂŽles đŸ€Ł https://t.co/E0Ffbj96yk

    1.2K18592461K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202632x their median

    Les meilleures rĂ©actions de marques Ă  la sortie de l’iPhone Duo đŸ€­ En voir plus : https://t.co/IZLWwZOKKG https://t.co/uLrDQaHvlU

    1.1K1122966K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202630x their median

    Ces agriculteurs des Hautes-Alpes parodient l’Hyrox dans une vidĂ©o dĂ©calĂ©e devenue virale 🐄 https://t.co/EMB8wWGykT

    967196103063K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202619x their median

    L’humour noir au service d’une grande cause. C’est brillant 👏 https://t.co/Z8TYthlvCn

    56815631326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202611x their median

    Un ours polaire qui regarde sous la banquise, une vipÚre piquée par un moustique ou un léopard lancé aprÚs un écureuil : le Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2026 dévoile ses premiÚres images. Le concours du Natural History Museum de Londres a sélectionné ces clichés parmi plus de 65 000 photos venues de 121 pays et territoires. Chaque image saisit un comportement, une rencontre ou un instant presque impossible à provoquer, comme cet ours photographié grùce à un appareil placé sous un trou de respiration de phoque. Plus de photos : https://t.co/bdRwQUe620

    392544415K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20269.9x their median

    Le street artiste @newsfromtoolate a envoyĂ© frappĂ© đŸŠș https://t.co/NqC7qHFEIY

    358381024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20268.7x their median

    Quand un club de foot tacle
 le foot moderne ⚜ https://t.co/P4wMVe5I5D

    32124036.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20268.7x their median

    Le Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2026 a rendu son palmarĂšs : 19 photos laurĂ©ates, 65 403 candidatures dans 121 pays. 📾 La photo gagnante est bouleversante et montre une Ă©lĂ©phante qui traverse le lit assĂ©chĂ© d’une riviĂšre en Namibie avec le corps d’un Ă©lĂ©phanteau entre sa trompe et sa dĂ©fense. Ce n’était pas son petit. Les chercheurs connaissent cette femelle : elle a perdu son propre petit il y a plusieurs annĂ©es et a dĂ©jĂ  Ă©tĂ© vue en train de porter les petits morts d’autres mĂšres. 🐘 Pour dĂ©couvrir les coulisses des autres clichĂ©s laurĂ©ats, rendez-vous sur notre article : https://t.co/eYL5OtDuOx

    300441140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.6x their median

    Zoomez un peu, ce n’est pas un bug d’affichage đŸ€“ Une crĂ©ation LEGO de heathersbricks https://t.co/44myHIk27K

    253110044K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.9x their median

    Ces piles de serviettes montrent qu’une couleur ne suffit pas Ă  dĂ©finir une marque : c’est sa nuance qui fait toute la diffĂ©rence. Du rouge sombre de Netflix au rose clair de Barbie, chaque teinte installe un imaginaire distinct. L’une paraĂźt plus intense et cinĂ©matographique ; l’autre plus pop et ludique. En alignant ces dĂ©gradĂ©s avec des logos, ces visuels rĂ©vĂšlent comment les marques transforment une simple couleur en vĂ©ritable signature. Une sĂ©rie visuelle publiĂ©e par Repute Forge En voir plus : https://t.co/b0MAwmlCXX

    200360116K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 58 original posts, its engagement rate beats 31% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.857% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.89% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 58 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Creapills 💊's engagement rate on X?
Creapills 💊 (@creapills) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 58 original posts from the last 30 days against 161,634 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Creapills 💊 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @creapills have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 31% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @creapills post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going