Back to @cracks_oficial's profile

CRACKS engagement report

@cracks_oficial - 185K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.044%
of 185K followers
Per impression
1.96%
4.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
82
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 1.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 769 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CRACKS's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.044%, CRACKS sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 241 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 20269.4x their median

    🥹🇦🇷 ¡ES BELÍSIMA! 🩵 La última camiseta que Lionel Messi vistió con la Selección Argentina ya está exhibida en el Museo de River Plate. 🔟🏆 ✨ ¡Una pieza histórica para el recuerdo! https://t.co/HLAS0cfSEP

    71254127.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20266.7x their median

    EL MEJOR 11 DE LA HISTORIA DE LA CHAMPIONS SEGÚN NUESTRA COMUNIDAD ✨🏆 https://t.co/4vXTNWo7qU

    4981834223K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.0x their median

    🏆🔥 ¡EL FAVORITO DE LA GENTE! Kylian Mbappé encabeza la votación popular de L’Équipe para el Balón de Oro 2026, seguido de Khvicha Kvaratskhelia y Harry Kane. Ojo: esta encuesta es simbólica y refleja únicamente la opinión de los aficionados; no determina al ganador oficial. https://t.co/sKcGbSHika

    4283232111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.0x their median

    🚨😳 ¡CAOS TOTAL EN FENERBAHÇE! La noche en Fenerbahçe terminó en un auténtico caos después del empate 1-1 ante Roma en Champions. 🤯🇹🇷 Primero, İsmail Kartal anunció su renuncia en conferencia de prensa tras el partido. Minutos después, Archie Brown, jugador del Fenerbahçe, se enteró de la salida de su entrenador por los medios durante una entrevista. 😳🎙️ Y cuando parecía que Kartal ya estaba fuera, apareció el presidente Aziz Yildirim para anunciar que rechazaba su dimisión y que el técnico continuaría en el cargo. 🚨

    40190019K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20264.0x their median

    🚨🏆 ¿LAS VOTACIONES DEL BALÓN DE ORO? Una supuesta filtración del ranking del Balón de Oro está circulando en redes y coloca a Lamine Yamal en el primer lugar, por delante de Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappé y Harry Kane. 👀🔥 👀 Cracks ¿Será Lamine el ganador? https://t.co/OdpXzQO529

    2851527412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.5x their median

    ➟ 𝙁𝙄𝙉𝘼𝙇 | Barcelona 7-2 Racing Santander APLANADORA. El Barcelona vuela en la liga. Jornada 6 🗓️ | LaLiga 🇪🇸 https://t.co/VRixKTuqvc

    27612013.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.5x their median

    🚨🇵🇹 ¡SUSPENDIDO POR IRSE! 😳 Cristiano Ronaldo sería suspendido por la Federación Portuguesa tras abandonar la concentración luego de su conflicto con Jorge Jesus. La sanción podría ir de 1 a 6 meses, aunque la comisión disciplinaria aún debe determinar su duración. ⛔ https://t.co/MdlNcbFh9d

    254121628.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.2x their median

    🤯🔵🔴 "EL BARCELONA ES EL MEJOR EQUIPO" Después de la goleada, Giovanni van Bronckhorst, técnico de Feyenoord, destacó el nivel mostrado por Barcelona y lo colocó como uno de los grandes favoritos para ganar la Champions League. 🏆🔥 https://t.co/5hGS6uTkm6

    2585004.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.2x their median

    🤯🔵🔴 ¡BARCELONA ES UNA MÁQUINA DE GOLES! Por primera vez en su historia, Barcelona supera los 30 goles en sus primeros 7 partidos de una temporada contando todas las competiciones. ⚽🔥 Barcelona no deja de marcar y está viviendo un arranque ofensivo espectacular. ¡GOLES, GOLES Y MÁS GOLES! 🤯🍿

    2509013.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20262.7x their median

    🔥 ¡BARCELONA VUELA A OTRO NIVEL! ✈️🔵🔴 💥 10 partidos, 10 victorias. ¡Pleno de triunfos para el Barça! ⚽ 43 goles a favor 🧤 Solo 9 goles recibidos https://t.co/CB3rjhv3M1

    2137103.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 82 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.2K times each, and 1.96% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 769 interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

What is CRACKS's engagement rate on X?
CRACKS (@cracks_oficial) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 184,602 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.044%, CRACKS sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cracks_oficial have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cracks_oficial post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going