Back to @cossackgundi's profile

COSSACKGUNDI engagement report

@cossackgundi - 118K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.4%
of 118K followers
Per impression
6.87%
6.9K views on a typical post
Reach
5.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
474
interactions (median)
Saved
0.131%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 474 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.4%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 6.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

COSSACKGUNDI's engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.4%, COSSACKGUNDI sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 223 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20266.3x their median

    Intreasting logic from a man who served one year in the "British army" 😅 'I left the British Army when I realised we were the aggressors' Joins the russian military invading another country as the aggressers 🤡 https://t.co/xcCmbEro8x

    2.7K177120770K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.7x their median

    Ukraine is the only county in Europe that is actively fighting back against an invasion of Illegal immigrants.

    2.4K23642625K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20265.2x their median

    Moscow's air defence has reached the point where the last line of defence is a bloke with a Makarov pistol. https://t.co/GzTmQeoqUX

    2.2K1753117103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.0x their median

    I don't post as much anymore, but still kicking 😁 https://t.co/t07VTDU5Oj

    2.2K8764128K viewsView on X
  • May 25, 20264.3x their median

    Hundreds of foreigners from 48 different countries are currently being held by Ukraine as prisoners of war after fighting for Russia. Many of them have already spent more than two years in captivity. The I Want to Live project has identified over 28,000 foreign nationals serving in the Russian military. At least 5,149 are confirmed dead and that’s only the ones that have actually been identified. Ukraine went through tooth and nail to get myself and 9 other foreign volunteers released, because they believed their people were worth bringing home. Meanwhile Russia refuses to do the same for the foreigners who fought under its flag, even when there’s a real chance those men could go home, whether that’s to Russia or back to the countries they originally came from. That alone says everything. Russia was willing to use these foreigners to fight and die for them, but when it comes to getting them back, they don’t seem to care at all. A simple foreigners for foreigners exchange could bring a lot of these men home, yet Russia still refuses.

    1.6K3725213126K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20263.1x their median

    Sums up Russian mentality. https://t.co/wdY4VPwxvn

    1.4K1046421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.1x their median

    And already, the air ceasefire has been broken. Russian drones are flying from the border toward Kyiv. Either Putin has no control over his military, or he simply doesn’t care. Either way, it’s a terrible look.

    1.2K215251117K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20262.3x their median

    Hasan reacts to John Mearsheimer's take that Ukrainians are going to lose the war and should have quit a while ago instead of sending their people to the meat grinder "Before people say, oh Mearsheimer classic tankie..he is just a believer in offensive realism, he does not think that engaging a proxy war is good for American interests and he certainly doesn't think it's good for Ukrainian interests..he is not a Russian operative, u just have a disagreement with him" "Who's going to get mad at that, he's right" - chatter "People who do think that Ukraine should fight down to the last Ukrainian"

    775321691281.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.2x their median

    Figured since it's been forever since I made a proper post thaat isn’ta shitpost or rage bait, thought i'd give everyone a little update on how I'm doing First photo is me now, weighing 116kg. Still got 18kg to go until I hit my goal weight. Second photo is from August last year when I was a fat fuck weighing 155kg Honestly, why did none of you tell me this is what I actually looked like?? I genuinely thought you guys were joking when you said I'd gotten big Looking at it now I'm just thinking... Jesus. Still got a bit to go, but definitely going in the right direction.

    9621850029K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20261.7x their median

    Russian's criticising Wildbarry hits by Ukraine after launching an Invasion and targeting everything including Novaposta terminals and warehouses for the past 4 years. https://t.co/EYxHC8J9yR

    748681018.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 474 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.4%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 78% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.9K times each, and 6.87% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

What is COSSACKGUNDI's engagement rate on X?
COSSACKGUNDI (@cossackgundi) has an engagement rate of 0.4%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 118,248 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.4%, COSSACKGUNDI sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cossackgundi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 78% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cossackgundi post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going