Back to @cosmos's profile

Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ engagement report

@cosmos - 551K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 551K followers
Per impression
0.65%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
108
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 551K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 610 interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️'s engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 4, 20265.6x their median

    Cosmos Labs is acquiring the @mintscanio product suite and welcoming select Mintscan personnel to the Cosmos Labs Ecosystem team. This business expansion adds new team members to the Ecosystem team across product, engineering, and operations. It also allocates dedicated resources to the Cosmos Hub and key ecosystem infrastructure to support reliability and growth. https://t.co/FEiE9rRw6M

    305232472673K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.5x their median

    We have partnered with @Peersyst to bring digital ledger infrastructure to Latin America and Spain. The agreement formalizes a multi-year collaboration by designating Peersyst as a key provider of Cosmos-based solutions for central banks, financial institutions, and governments across the region. Read the full story:

    217409320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.3x their median

    Cosmos has partnered with @0xZeeve to help financial institutions deploy tokenized deposits and digital assets on our battle-tested blockchain infrastructure. Read the full press release: https://t.co/gi1Z6h7oSG https://t.co/a5z9Nj5zk5

    197386616K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.9x their median

    We're bringing digital ledger infrastructure across Latin America and Spain. Through our new partnership, @Peersyst is now an official Cosmos provider, working directly with organizations looking to build on the Cosmos stack. Read the full story: https://t.co/MLLL9ENKqD https://t.co/Dlx5q6H1VI

    1643312120K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20261.7x their median

    Cosmos Tokenization Suite is built around problems banks know well. Payments that can't clear on weekends, and settlement risk sitting on the books until markets reopen. It lets banks and financial institutions offer instant settlement and programmable money via infrastructure that integrates with existing systems and connects to major payment rails.

    1402511515K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20261.7x their median

    Barry Plunkett @BPIV400, Co-CEO of Cosmos, demonstrates an interbank transfer over IBC. With one product that interoperates with any network, banks avoid the cost of separate integrations for every counterparty or rail they need to reach. Banks preserve privacy and security throughout.

    141278417K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.6x their median

    For banks, benefiting from tokenized deposits takes more than technology alone. Cosmos and @0xZeeve pair DLT technology with advisory support, giving banks a risk-managed path to take advantage of new use cases in tokenized deposits and digital assets. Read more: https://t.co/cYdH8g1STL

    133274516K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.5x their median

    We're excited to announce our partnership with Peersyst to bring digital ledger infrastructure in Latin America and Spain. The agreement reflects years of collaboration, designating Peersyst a key provider of Cosmos-based solutions across the region. Hear from Ferran Prat @ferranprat12, CEO of @Peersyst, below. https://t.co/E0vdmeU6BW

    1292410013K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.5x their median

    Bank-grade cross-ledger infrastructure has to meet a high bar in regulated environments: - Complete control over the transaction - A complete audit trail - Full visibility into what's happening at every stage IBC's architecture addresses all three. https://t.co/9NWqXPVgvl

    1272210317K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026

    We're excited to welcome the new ecosystem team members. Together, this team is leading ecosystem infrastructure, open-source tooling, and the Cosmos Hub roadmap with CBO @qxnico, Ecosystem Product Lead @RoboMcGobo, and others from the Cosmos Labs global team. https://t.co/dZU2Gs9l0c

    1211714418K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 108 interactions against 551K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 28% are part of a thread and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 610 interactions, about 5.6x its own typical post.

What is Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️'s engagement rate on X?
Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ (@cosmos) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 551,441 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cosmos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cosmos post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going