Back to @cosmos's profile

Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ engagement report

@cosmos - 548K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 548K followers
Per impression
0.782%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
110
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 548K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.782% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 646 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️'s engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 344 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20265.9x their median

    Today, Cosmos is launching the Cosmos Partner Network with 17 leading industry service providers. They will help banks and global financial players accelerate digital transformation initiatives through the Cosmos Tokenization Suite and Cosmos digital ledger solutions. Cosmos and the Partner Network provide a complete service suite for tokenized finance that enables financial players to harness new use cases, including: - Enabling 24/7 payment settlement - Improving treasury liquidity management - Unlocking first-to-market use cases like programmable escrow, programmable trade finance, and agentic commerce Financial institutions and solution providers interested in seamless multi-vendor solutions through the Cosmos Partner Network are welcome to get in touch. https://t.co/Dxo6jJO0TF

    442129443178K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 20266.2x their median

    Cosmos Labs is acquiring the @mintscanio product suite and welcoming select Mintscan personnel to the Cosmos Labs Ecosystem team. This business expansion adds new team members to the Ecosystem team across product, engineering, and operations. It also allocates dedicated resources to the Cosmos Hub and key ecosystem infrastructure to support reliability and growth. https://t.co/FEiE9rRw6M

    306249472676K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.0x their median

    Cosmos provides connectivity to help banks participate in Swift’s ledger for 24/7 cross-border payments. The Cosmos Tokenization Suite connects banks’ tokenized deposit ledgers with networks like Swift’s ledger, while retaining existing settlement arrangements. Read the entire story: https://t.co/QicICQbqku

    2476410720K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.8x their median

    We have partnered with @Peersyst to bring digital ledger infrastructure to Latin America and Spain. The agreement formalizes a multi-year collaboration by designating Peersyst as a key provider of Cosmos-based solutions for central banks, financial institutions, and governments across the region. Read the full story:

    216409320K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.3x their median

    Cosmos has partnered with @0xZeeve to help financial institutions deploy tokenized deposits and digital assets on our battle-tested blockchain infrastructure. Read the full press release: https://t.co/gi1Z6h7oSG https://t.co/a5z9Nj5zk5

    197396617K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.0x their median

    On September 10, Cosmos is demoing the Cosmos Tokenization Suite live at Finovate Fall. We'll talk about how banks can use it to grow revenue, retain deposits, and run treasury more efficiently. Join us at FinnovateFall. https://t.co/OQC8Y7b4hT

    168398216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20262.2x their median

    We're bringing digital ledger infrastructure across Latin America and Spain. Through our new partnership, @Peersyst is now an official Cosmos provider, working directly with organizations looking to build on the Cosmos stack. Read the full story: https://t.co/MLLL9ENKqD https://t.co/Dlx5q6H1VI

    1633312120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.8x their median

    On March 29, 2021, the first IBC connection was established between the Cosmos and IRIS Network. Five years on, IBC connects 115+ digital ledgers, has moved USD 50B+ in assets, and operates with no third-party intermediary. Today, it remains a neutral, open-source standard for interoperability.

    1433025115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.8x their median

    The Cosmos Partner Network gives global financial players a single platform for accelerating tokenization and digital asset initiatives. Through its easy multi-vendor solutions, the Partner Network enables banks and financial institutions to safely and seamlessly power new digital use cases. Read more: https://t.co/vIjNvS0DMy

    152394215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.7x their median

    The Cosmos Partner Network brings together leading industry service providers with deep expertise, global delivery capacity, and proven results. Hear from leaders at @utila_io, @HypernativeLabs, @Peersyst, and @silencelabs_sl on why they joined the initiative. https://t.co/BtOR9ewibX

    1403213416K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 548K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.782% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 646 interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.

What is Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️'s engagement rate on X?
Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ (@cosmos) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 547,666 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, Cosmos - The Interchain ⚛️ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cosmos have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cosmos post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going