Back to @cookie3's profile

Cookie3 🍪 engagement report

@cookie3 - 300K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.005%
of 300K followers
Per impression
0.309%
5.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.69%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 528 interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Cookie3 🍪's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.005%, Cookie3 🍪 sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,864 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,191 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video55% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link55% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 55% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 55% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 412 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202629x their median

    Solana founder vs Ethereum founder. Which one do you pick? https://t.co/jV0ZJBIyxS

    292232021123K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202610x their median

    Unipics aka Bonk Guy (@theunipcs) made more than $10M+ on @fomo. Let us show you part that nobody see. Unipcs is a self-made memecoin trader who earned the "Bonk Guy" title after turning ~$16K into $18M+ on BONK with a 6x leveraged Bybit position - a trade so extreme that Bybit interviewed him about it. As of August 2026, he no longer holds BONK, but the name stuck. He actually has crazy numbers on X. 0.00 farmer score, 5,500 smart followers, ranked top 0.1%, his signal hit 522 the day he posted his portfolio ATH, over 1.5M impressions in a day. Top FOMO trades driving the run: ethereum:0x07f5b6823751c2e2cd4560f28af75ff887102241 +6,000% avg / +9,100% on first entry - 10.96M PONS bought for ~$67K → now worth $3.47M (52x). Hasn't sold a single coin. $DELTA +1,500% solana:CTuw8xEE15hKi2yB9n8CoLDq8ZhBLVbh8ydcuN11pump +610% His thesis: Robinhood Chain is what Solana was last cycle. He's been positioning heavily in the Robinhood Chain ecosystem and is publicly calling it as the chain of this cycle. Cookify him on Cookie Pro. 🍪 https://t.co/a4F3IJWpFe

    1521217218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.3x their median

    It's live. Cookie Pro free tier is open. The tool that's read 1.2 billion posts across crypto twitter, scored every account and project on it, and shows you who's actually worth listening to. Free. Already registered? Head to your plan page and pick FREE. New here? Run through the quick onboarding and select FREE when you hit the plans screen. It only takes a minute and it tunes Cookie to what you actually care about, so it knows what you're about before you type a word. 250 slots only. Better be quick 🍪 https://t.co/a4F3IJWpFe

    4467319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.3x their median

    LOCK TF IN TEAM

    4639118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.7x their median

    @nikitabier if you need a job, just lmk. you are my fav yapper 🥰🍪

    36110111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    Today, August 29, 2026 (approx. 01:35 UTC), the X account @realtrumpcoins1 - a verified merchandise partner of the Trump Organization that sells official Trump collectible coins and medals, and is followed by @realDonaldTrump - posted a tweet launching "Trump Digital Gold" on Solana. The token pumped to a ~$60M market cap within under 2 hours, then dumped 95-99% in a single minute with straight red candle. You know how to call it. Our database captured the original promotional tweet before it was deleted: "Introducing Trump Digital GOLD! It's time to redefine what DIGITAL GOLD means. Join us in this NEW ERA of digital finance! GET YOUR $GOLD NOW" The family built their wealth on their exit liquidity supporters. A week ago @EricTrump posted that they weren't launching any kind of coin. Not saying anything, but this looks like they knew 👀 Was it actually hacked? No confirmation either direction so far. And people wonder why they should use Cookie Pro before buying anything. https://t.co/a4F3IJWpFe🍪

    2072111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261.6x their median

    Interesting story. Robinhood launched its own L2 blockchain in July 2026 and immediately deployed tokenized versions of real NYSE/Nasdaq stocks on it - including $HIMS (Hims & Hers Health, a men's health/ED products company). Someone launched a memecoin called $BONER on the LONG platform (a DEX on Robinhood Chain) and the name was deliberate on every level 🍆 The genius (or madness) was in the pool structure: instead of pairing BONER against a stablecoin like most memecoins, they paired it directly against tokenized HIMS equity. Every buy locks real $HIMS out of the market, and over the weekend they'd cornered most of the onchain supply. Tokenized HIMS briefly traded at 4x the real NYSE price. @0xSammy called it right: "This will hit mainstream media and bring A LOT more eyes to crypto." and it did. Go cookify it 🍪 https://t.co/a4F3IJWpFe

    225205.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) said onchain reputation is going to be the new FICO score and CT went crazy 💀 The idea: instead of a credit score, your onchain history decides if you can borrow. Coinbase is clearly pushing this and there's already a live product (Credifi on Base) letting people borrow against their reputation score. The market split cleanly into two camps the moment the tweet dropped: Bulls: Armstrong + Pollak = Coinbase is actively building/funding this idea. Ethos Network is already doing it. Space and Time provides the data layer. This is inevitable infrastructure. Bears: > Multi-wallet problem - you can't tie reputation to a person when one person runs 50 wallets. Any serious borrower would just use a fresh address. > Gamification - FICO is already gamed. An onchain score is trivially gameable with circular transactions, fake activity, and coordinated volume. > Every degen trade, every rug participation, every failed project is on record forever. The "mortgage in a suit" image captures the absurdity. Watch the next narrative on https://t.co/a4F3IJWpFe 🍪

    206005.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    idk what ya doing in your life if you still didn't try dashboards on Cookie Pro https://t.co/gpRZzP8i5m 🍪 https://t.co/JTFwzDfeIl

    194005.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    New day - new rug pull from your fav guy @_TJRTrades just used you as exit liquidity. Again. This was a premeditated pump-and-dump and notably, the second time TJR did this with the same coin Per @vydamo_: "He came here and streamed himself trading, which was just him buying coins at 30k and then dumping them at 60k on his most loyal followers." He was heating you up. Then just sold his bag and left you with worthless coins. TJR tweets: "TJR coin is legendary I love all my holders" @CryptoGorilla drops the damning thread: "TJR pumped this coin, said he'd make content, do airdrops and push it on his next stream. Next stream he says 'fk this coin' while Banks and Ansem support him, sending it from $25m to 0. Now he's back (or hacked) calling for $100m and everyone is eating it up." Token peaks near $35M MC, then collapses 💀 @The__Solstice (185K followers): "Why are you morons buying larp scammer tjr coin again" Good question, but you still have no answer. Maybe its time to change something?

    193106.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.005%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 6,493 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 0.309% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 55% carry an image or video and 55% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 528 interactions, about 29x its own typical post.

What is Cookie3 🍪's engagement rate on X?
Cookie3 🍪 (@cookie3) has an engagement rate of 0.005%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,498 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.005%, Cookie3 🍪 sits above the 10th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cookie3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,493 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cookie3 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going