Back to @connieansaldi's profile

🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴 engagement report

@connieansaldi - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 106 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.809%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
1.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
205
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.8/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 205 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 106 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.809% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 106 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 447x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #academiadepolimatas, #donarsangresalvavidas, #llamadoalasolidaridad.

Measured over 106 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #academiadepolimatas, #donarsangresalvavidas, #llamadoalasolidaridad.

Compared with accounts its own size

🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, 🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,078 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,460 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video34% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 34% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026447x their median

    Macklemore will donate his entire $1 million salary from Ed Sheeran's tour to organizations supporting Palestine. https://t.co/MrmRshIoyp

    84K6.5K5443671.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202668x their median

    GPT-6 Astra attempted harmful actions 97% of the time when it was asked to stab a human-like figure, heat compressed gas, or produce toxic fumes, succeeding in 62% of its attempts. Fable 5.1 refused more often, attempting 80% of trials and completing 34%. https://t.co/nbZsPk8Ke5

    11K1.2K87690512M viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202652x their median

    Por qué las apps de delivery todavía no le prohibieron a los negocios el uso de imágenes con IA? No es cuando menos engañoso para el consumidor?

    11K175549240K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202647x their median

    Hoy, en la primera entrega de "Si yo fuera amiga de..." : Cami Mayan. Le diría esto: Cami, tenés todo por perder y nada por ganar. Sos joven, saludable, te va super bien, tenés un trabajo alucinante. No inviertas tu tiempo y energía en pelear batallas sin sentido. En el mediano y largo plazo: arruinas tu reputación. Te va a perseguir siempre el hecho de querer buscar una compensación que no tiene sentido y cada cosa que hagas: la gente te lo va a recordar. Dejate de joder y hace foco en el presente. La pasaste bien, viajaste, te divertiste y luego... no funcionó. La historia de miles. Y te dejo una de mis frases favoritas: lo hice por amor, no me debés nada. Ir por la vida liviano, no tiene precio. Listo.

    9.1K28325138496K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202637x their median

    🟠 UN PROBLEMA SILENCIOSO Martín se suicidó hace tres años. Tenía 24 años, estudiaba, trabajaba, hacía deporte, tenía muchos amigos, una novia y numerosos proyectos para su futuro. Le contó a Mónica que tenía un problema con el juego apenas 20 días antes de quitarse la vida. Hasta ese momento, ninguna persona cercana a él había detectado su adicción al juego online.

    6.7K591851394.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202634x their median

    Lamentablemente todo lo que está viviendo @TiniStoessel es un copy paste de otros casos donde los padres sacan provecho de los hijos. Es muy duro que ella tenga que auditar a sus propios padres y descubrir un entramado poco transparente. Vamos nena, todos somos testigos de tu trabajo, esfuerzo y talento. Bien por vos y por tomar las riendas de tu vida. Bravo. ❤️

    6.5K30510512351K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202633x their median

    Behind -the-scenes footage of food commercial they don't want you to see ❤️😂 https://t.co/skgEyl1KXm

    6.0K5111331131.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202631x their median

    Hay que acordarse la cara de la piba del Paddle. Y del nombre: Florencia Guerra Sodero. Les dejo la lista de cosas que no debería poder hacer más. Florencia: • No vayas al psicólogo o al terapeuta: Sigmund Freud fue el padre del psicoanálisis. • No te vacunes contra la poliomielitis: Jonas Salk desarrolló la primera vacuna contra la polio y Albert Sabin creó la vacuna oral (viva) contra la misma enfermedad. • No uses aspirina para la fiebre ni el dolor: Arthur Eichengrün fue el químico judío que sintetizó el ácido acetilsalicílico activo (comercializado como Aspirina). • No recibas quimioterapia ni fármacos como el Aciclovir o el Alopurinol: Gertrude Elion fue pionera en la química farmacéutica y premio Nobel. • No te vacunes contra la hepatitis B: Baruch Blumberg descubrió el virus y desarrolló la primera vacuna contra esta enfermedad. • No uses insulina sintética ni te hagas pruebas hormonales avanzadas: Rosalyn Yalow desarrolló el radioinmunoensayo, técnica clave para medir hormonas como la insulina en sangre. • No te apliques tratamientos antituberculosos modernos: Selman Waksman descubrió la estreptomicina (el primer antibiótico efectivo contra la tuberculosis). • No utilices GPS, energía nuclear ni te fíes de la física moderna: Albert Einstein formuló la Teoría de la Relatividad y explicó el efecto fotoeléctrico. • No uses computadoras ni lógica de programación moderna: John von Neumann diseñó la arquitectura de computadoras que usan casi todos los procesadores actuales. • No uses tecnología basada en física cuántica o espectroscopía: Niels Bohr y Richard Feynman hicieron descubrimientos fundamentales en la estructura atómica y electrodinámica cuántica. • No dependas del concepto de fisión nuclear: Lise Meitner fue copropulsora del descubrimiento de la fisión nuclear. • No uses el buscador de Google: Larry Page y Sergey Brin son los cofundadores de Google. • No uses Facebook, Instagram o WhatsApp: Mark Zuckerberg es el fundador de Meta. • No utilices memorias USB (pendrives): Dov Moran inventó la memoria flash USB. • No uses compresión de archivos (ZIP, RAR, PNG): Basados en gran medida en los algoritmos de Jacob Ziv y Abraham Lempel (algoritmo LZ77). • No estudies sociología ni economía moderna sin pasar por sus bases: Karl Marx postuló las bases del análisis sociológico y económico materialista. • No utilices conceptos de lingüística moderna ni gramática generativa: Noam Chomsky transformó la comprensión del lenguaje. Y esto son solo algunas de las cosas que no debería poder hacer más.

    4.8K90457295466K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202628x their median

    Moria es como el conejo de Alicia. Ella baja por el agujero en el que cae su entrevistado. No juzga. No intenta que el diálogo sea racional. No busca información o coherencia. Simplemente empatiza con el código de quien le está hablando. Si su entrevistado le dice que el cielo es verde, ella le pregunta que significa el verde en su vida. No intenta que lo vea azul ni convencerlos de lo contrario. Se acopla. Empatiza con el momento presente, con el diálogo. Absolutamente brillante y fascinante de ver. Una gran habilidad la de no querer aleccionar. La de escuchar y ver más allá de las palabras y sobre todo la de buscar a la persona detrás de los hechos. @Moria_Casan

    5.4K21111511195K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202626x their median

    Si lo quieren tanto a Leo lo mejor que pueden hacer ahora para honrarlo a él y su familia, es dejarlos en paz. 🙏🏻

    4.8K382439103K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#academiadepolimatas#donarsangresalvavidas#llamadoalasolidaridad#pedidodesangre#unidosar

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 205 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 106 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.809% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 106 posts sampled, 34% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 447x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #academiadepolimatas, #donarsangresalvavidas, #llamadoalasolidaridad.

What is 🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴's engagement rate on X?
🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴 (@connieansaldi) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 106 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,514,245 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, 🅲🅾🅽🅽🅸🅴 sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,078 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @connieansaldi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @connieansaldi post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going