Back to @conciouscreator's profile

collectiveconsciousness engagement report

@conciouscreator - 134K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.084%
of 134K followers
Per impression
2.98%
3.8K views on a typical post
Reach
2.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
112
interactions (median)
Saved
0.133%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 2.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 608 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #karma, #love.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #karma, #love.

Compared with accounts its own size

collectiveconsciousness's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.084%, collectiveconsciousness sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 37 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 12, 20255.4x their median

    Never let anyone tell you how your magic works. Never ever.

    43178871235K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.1x their median

    🧵 1/4 Every element carries an extraordinary gift. And every element, when it is unconscious, undisciplined, or out of balance, carries the potential for destruction. The weakness of an element is not separate from its strength. It is often the strength itself, operating without wisdom. 🔥 FIRE Fire is transformation. It is passion, courage, desire, creation, purification, and the will to move forward. When fire is consciously directed, it illuminates. It warms. It protects. It creates movement where there was once stagnation. But fire without restraint consumes. Passion becomes obsession. Courage becomes aggression. Desire becomes possession. Power becomes domination. Fire’s lesson is not to diminish itself. It is to learn restraint. Use your power without allowing it to consume you or everything you love. 💧 WATER Water is healing. It is intuition, emotional depth, connection, nourishment, and the ability to adapt. Water does not need to force its way forward. It moves around what it cannot move through. It softens what has become hard and brings life wherever it flows. But water without boundaries floods. Sensitivity becomes emotional overwhelm. Connection becomes enmeshment. Surrender becomes passivity. Adaptability becomes the abandonment of self. Water’s lesson is not to stop feeling. It is to develop boundaries. Remain open without losing yourself.

    1913212411K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.1x their median

    All of The Love ❤️

    19328634.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/LM3oM1H4Us

    17842534.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.9x their median

    Trust the Heart

    17628714.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.7x their median

    Full Spectrum 🌈 Light Body https://t.co/1SMA5ClbLU

    15428824.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    The sun and the moon https://t.co/0Zz7FLgnLG

    133121013.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Happy Harvest Moon 🌕 https://t.co/K2QoKKcKbd

    9118213.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    https://t.co/XdQiuPDjAW

    8812343.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026

    https://t.co/7hCQccOexm

    905502.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#karma#love

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 112 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.8K times each, and 2.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.80% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 608 interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #karma, #love.

What is collectiveconsciousness's engagement rate on X?
collectiveconsciousness (@conciouscreator) has an engagement rate of 0.084%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,113 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.084%, collectiveconsciousness sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @conciouscreator have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @conciouscreator post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going