Back to @cometcalls's profile

comet engagement report

@cometcalls - 104K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.101%
of 104K followers
Per impression
1.98%
5.3K views on a typical post
Reach
5.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
104
interactions (median)
Saved
0.038%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tag: #ufc.

Compared with accounts its own size

comet's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.101%, comet sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 13, 2026124x their median

    (With a mouth full of food and showing my phone to a coworker) Thats gigafly. He is gigachads friend.

    12K955151197K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202611x their median

    Bro got rugged for $20k and decided to become a philosopher https://t.co/3VqmWBQS9m

    97350110760K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202610x their median

    I invested $3000 in $laptop It is now worth $1 For me to break even, laptop will have to reach a market cap of $300b, the equivalent of Netflix, Morgan Stanley, and the Bank of China https://t.co/xiqZPXlTP0

    6962830614107K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.1x their median

    i feel like if they're going to really kill bitcoin today is the day

    4221092744K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20262.5x their median

    Nobody at BiggerZ wants a cut of your win. 100% RTP on Originals, that’s the whole point. We removed the house edge. Mate tax is your problem. https://t.co/cSYpo526wh

    12022665330K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20261.8x their median

    $18,000+ in volume on our https://t.co/zelfTJHdZ1, and counting. The biggest amounts? Trades, made straight from a private balance. Nothing exposed. Trade privately on @solana. https://t.co/agj0ZGzjPF

    1133339312K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20261.8x their median

    McDonald’s arches on you dumbass bulls Put the fries in the bag https://t.co/sj9wDPLkHN

    1211052019K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20261.7x their median

    BREAKING: New Gacha pack just dropped and the top pull is crazy! Lucky $100 is now LIVE with a 2007 Jolteon-Holo Gold Star worth $90k. Let it rip. 🫵

    1281425715K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Nasty double top. Send it below $60k https://t.co/C2JxSzbXsC

    9883407.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    My bro turned $3k to $100k in 20 hours Only in crypto @FullPortFOMO https://t.co/6Vg4NoU66p

    86113205.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ufc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.3K times each, and 1.98% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 18% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 124x its own typical post.

What is comet's engagement rate on X?
comet (@cometcalls) has an engagement rate of 0.101%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 103,679 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.101%, comet sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cometcalls have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cometcalls post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going