Back to @cody_cooked's profile

CODY engagement report

@cody_cooked - 344K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 344K followers
Per impression
2.35%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.748% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 154x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

CODY's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, CODY sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.673%
p902.54%
p9982.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,467 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,932 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.673%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 92 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 2026154x their median

    New meme going viral👇 https://t.co/vIfBc6XxFL

    7.8K6882664952.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202612x their median

    GM maybe the real treasure was never the castle $KNIGHT https://t.co/YzCpAg4UNe

    433108161036K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.7x their median

    Good morning fam Wakeup flex 😆 https://t.co/emec2ZIt2o

    26061200013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.6x their median

    GM When your liquidation price is closer than your dreams https://t.co/4iiavKjZnc

    207230605.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20266.4x their median

    GM What if digital information could be verified without exposing the data behind it? Jupiter Meta Data Token (@jmdtblockchain) is building a blockchain infrastructure focused on verifiable data, privacy, and decentralized identity. Combining Zero-Knowledge Proofs with decentralized identity and an Ethereum-anchored Layer 2/Layer 3 architecture, $JMDT enables users and enterprises to verify information while keeping sensitive data private. From privacy-preserving KYC and enterprise data to on-device AI attestation and real-world applications, JMDT is building toward a more verifiable and privacy-first digital ecosystem. $JMDT is coming to Coinstore. #Blockchain #ZK #JMDT #Coinstore Explore more: https://t.co/kEH2YZBEkg

    17320191012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20265.9x their median

    At this level $KNIGHT PUREEEE BOUNCE BACK https://t.co/UpIzsLrEQO

    183117105.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.9x their median

    $DEOD breaking out from a falling wedge + huge volume! BTC is stable around $78,000, and I’m buying $DEOD for this breakout on MEXC. Buy: $0.0168–$0.018 Sell: $0.023 — around 40–35% profit potential The bullish catalyst is here: 🚀 Poloniex listing — 11 September $DEOD is my favorite trading pair. I’ve made good profits trading it in the past, and I’m going for it again.

    2170138027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.8x their median

    GM the 6th shadow thought the dip was over The dip was just catching up https://t.co/aRi4WFaLiy

    182116307.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.7x their median

    life when everything goes smooth Gm https://t.co/Vw9tqtm2Ls

    1660178017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.7x their median

    Never stop grinding https://t.co/rOtcl4LDMi

    170017208.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 344K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.748% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 154x its own typical post.

What is CODY's engagement rate on X?
CODY (@cody_cooked) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 343,869 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, CODY sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,467 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @cody_cooked have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @cody_cooked post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going