Back to @codigofacilito's profile

Código Facilito 🐊 engagement report

@codigofacilito - 124K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 124K followers
Per impression
0.657%
3.2K views on a typical post
Reach
2.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0.203%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 233 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #googlesummit.

Compared with accounts its own size

Código Facilito 🐊's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Código Facilito 🐊 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    Hace 15 años YouTube se veía así, y Código Facilito arrancaba su historia formando a millones de desarrolladores de habla hispana. ¿Lo recuerdas? https://t.co/NbwdsmOJnf

    208151005.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.9x their median

    Feliz día 256 del año: Día del programador. https://t.co/cSM3Q7zd4W

    16521014.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20268.1x their median

    Además de Claude y Codex, hay otras opciones de harness para desarrollo que puedes probar: Opencode Pi DEV SWE Agent Kimi Code ¿Has probado alguno? ¿Cuál es tu favorito?

    149220012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20267.8x their median

    ¿Alguien dijo gratis? El programa grabado de fundamentos de AI Engineer de 5 clases estará gratis esta semana, aprovecha: https://t.co/tUQqCiaU5a Prepárate para uno de los roles con mayor crecimiento en demanda laboral https://t.co/mnaWRiw4pk

    13627005.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.8x their median

    La clase 1 del curso de IA para datos nos dejó así: 🤯🤯🤯🤯 Si te la perdiste, la buena noticia es que aún puedes ver la grabación y ponerte al corriente antes de las próximas 2 clases. Es gratis: https://t.co/BeYVEcw4Mk https://t.co/phqbQq6Lep

    104160136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.8x their median

    ¿Sabías que puedes ver nuestro curso de C gratis? https://t.co/IETJoOeFOG Este ha sido uno de nuestros cursos más populares, recientemente lo renovamos pero decidimos mantenerlo como el anterior: GRATIS.

    6414104.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.6x their median

    15 años desde el primer hola mundo. El camino que nos ha llevado desde tus primeras líneas de código, hasta escribir el futuro con inteligencia artificial. Felices 15 años de Código Facilito a cada una y uno de los millones de estudiantes que hemos formado, sin ustedes, este proyecto no sería nada.

    629313.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.6x their median

    ¡Abrimos puertas a nuestro NUEVO programa de AI Engineer con Python! ⚡ https://t.co/WlOGgipa8E 17 sesiones en vivo para aprender a fondo: - Agentes, tools y MCP - RAG avanzado, GraphRAG y memoria - LangGraph y sistemas multi-agente - Evaluaciones y testing para IA - Guardrails y observabilidad - Optimización de costo y latencia - Modelos especializados y fine-tuning - Docker y despliegue a producción

    485105.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.5x their median

    Analistas de datos, ingenieros de datos, Machine Learning Engineers, MLOps, este curso es para ustedes. Es gratuito y es la actualización que buscabas para la era de la IA: https://t.co/BeYVEcw4Mk

    458004.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.1x their median

    Código Facilito cumple 15 años y durante los últimos 3 hemos formado una alianza con Microsoft que nos ha permitido capacitar a cientos de miles de personas en nube, ia, software y datos. Hemos ayudado a que decenas de miles de personas cursen formaciones gratuitas para obtener certificaciones oficiales. El impacto de esta colaboración es enorme. Muchas gracias a Microsoft por esta oportunidad.

    412012.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#googlesummit

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 124K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.57% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 233 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Código Facilito 🐊's engagement rate on X?
Código Facilito 🐊 (@codigofacilito) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 124,437 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Código Facilito 🐊 sits above the 10th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @codigofacilito have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @codigofacilito post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going