Back to @codeorg's profile

CodeAI engagement report

@codeorg - 934K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 934K followers
Per impression
0.188%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.45%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 934K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.455% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 818x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sxsw, #bestofstem, #panelpicker.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #sxsw, #bestofstem, #panelpicker.

Compared with accounts its own size

CodeAI's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, CodeAI sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 20, 2026818x their median

    57 years ago today, humans first landed on the Moon. The source code that helped get them there? It’s on GitHub. Margaret Hamilton led the MIT team responsible for Apollo’s onboard flight software. The Apollo Guidance Computer software eventually grew to about 145,000 lines of code. 👀 Explore the original Apollo 11 guidance software for the Command and Lunar Modules. 🌕 https://t.co/x1lDIB4vjX Image credit: Draper Laboratory; restoration by Adam Cuerden, via Wikimedia Commons.

    5.4K931133100303K viewsView on X
  • Feb 18, 2022429x their median

    Code + @Coldplay = #codeplay! We're teaming up with Coldplay to inspire students to code & dance. Create a dance to "Higher Power" — the band might spotlight yours on social media, and you could get to see the band live! Let's see what you create! Visit https://t.co/qSCFke77Cu https://t.co/6p6X6tmxdX

    2.6K527178123View on X
  • Jun 9, 202616x their median

    Before they were astronauts, the @NASA Artemis III crew members were students -- of mathematics, political science, medicine & engineering.🧑‍🎓 Meet the crew that will pave the way for lunar surface missions & inspire the Artemis Generation of explorers!✨ https://t.co/gxyGRXwBqV https://t.co/TNvS00W1An

    10025214.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20265.5x their median

    This 5 minute video is worth watching. It explains Anthropic’s research into how AI works. AI has become so advanced we no longer truly know how it works. We build it and then study it to try to understand what we built! 🤯 https://t.co/cJrfTHSzkG

    3211017.8K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20264.5x their median

    AI literacy empowers students to shape the future of AI. The AILit Framework, developed by @EUDigitalEdu and @OECDEduSkills with CodeAI and international experts, defines what students need to thrive with AI. Available now: https://t.co/sqSGS2Uipj #AILiteracy #AILitFramework https://t.co/RzSCuSEn0I

    1518213.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.5x their median

    Today we’re excited to announce a partnership with @OpenAI. 🧵 Frontier models are changing fast. This partnership creates an ongoing exchange between OpenAI’s researchers and safety experts and the CodeAI educators who build our curriculum.

    15101216K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20263.1x their median

    The final AILit Framework launches June 18! Join us online to explore the competences students need to navigate and shape a future with AI: https://t.co/YKP0FIHdT8 @EUDigitalEdu @OECDEduSkills #AILiteracy #AILitFramework https://t.co/7b2lV6wTWR

    519101.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20262.6x their median

    On July 1, Mississippi signed the Future Innovators Act into law — and we're proud to have helped shape it. Every child in the state now has a clearer path to the skills that define opportunity in the AI era. Thank you, @tatereeves, @BSSglobalLLC, @AnthonyAOwen, @BethanyS_MS, @chrisj1600.

    219002.2K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20262.4x their median

    Every student will live and work in a world shaped by AI. Our Founder and Chairman of the Board @hadip on what that means for education — and why understanding how it works is just the beginning. Full panel from @FortuneMagazine #BrainstormTech w/@tadeoyerinde @karinklein: https://t.co/Pwj984RX60

    106212.8K viewsView on X
  • May 3, 20262.0x their median

    Thank you to Fortune Brainstorm Tech for hosting me to talk about the future of education in an age of AI. Excited to share the stage with so many inspiring speakers. https://t.co/qUl9e5A02Q https://t.co/75AitnVjOL

    1113114K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#sxsw#bestofstem#panelpicker#sxswedu

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 934K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.188% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.455% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 77% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 818x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #sxsw, #bestofstem, #panelpicker.

What is CodeAI's engagement rate on X?
CodeAI (@codeorg) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 934,476 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, CodeAI sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @codeorg have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @codeorg post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going