CastoOcando.com engagement report
@cocando - 314K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 314K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
CastoOcando.com's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.042%, CastoOcando.com sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 97% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 97% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 129 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 30, 202622x their median
Venezuela's interim president says US energy deal will last 25 years https://t.co/opTm9SsP8l https://t.co/xp2tXtqIrQ
- Sep 16, 202616x their median
El "cara de tablismo" de la oposición que pidió, celebró y disfrutó las "sanciones" criminales que afectaron la alimentación, la salud, los servicios y la paz del pueblo venezolano, es inaudito. Andan tratando de evadir su innegable responsabilidad, con su cara tan lavada.
- Feb 4, 202624x their median
Mucha atención,es falsa la detención De Alex Saab! https://t.co/cPi0Y4jGqx
- Sep 3, 20269.7x their median
ALERTA para @YouTube, @TeamYouTube y @Meta: continúa la estrategia para silenciar al periodismo de investigación mediante reclamos falsos y denuncias fraudulentas de copyright. Desde anoche hemos recibido dos reclamos contra videos publicados en 2021. Ya nos retiraron un video de #SinFiltrosGeopolítica porque el contenido simplemente no le conviene a determinados intereses o no les gustó lo que estábamos informando. Las plataformas no pueden seguir aceptando acusaciones de terceros sin exigir pruebas claras sobre la titularidad de los contenidos. Esa vulnerabilidad está siendo aprovechada por delincuentes y empresas de “limpieza reputacional” para censurar investigaciones, intimidar periodistas y cerrar cuentas. Es inadmisible que quienes pretenden ocultar información tengan más derechos que los periodistas que investigan, producen y publican contenido original. Exigimos una revisión humana, transparente e inmediata de estos reclamos y medidas contra quienes abusan deliberadamente del sistema.
- Sep 15, 20268.5x their median
La OSCURA CONEXIÓN de Daniela CABELLO con Álex SAAB https://t.co/RJwEqY9R34
- Sep 1, 20268.4x their median
¿Dónde está Diosdado? Ojo con la cuarta pata del acuerdo petrolero.
- Sep 6, 20268.3x their median
NUEVO! CASA BLANCA en SHOCK por RECHAZO al PLAN Trump-Delcy-Betancourt https://t.co/e5N5mdCWPL
- Sep 4, 20267.5x their median
La postura de María Corina Machado frente al manejo de los recursos venezolanos no solo confronta al interinato y a la Casa Blanca, sino que reabre el tablero político ante la posibilidad de su retorno inmediato https://t.co/kOQNQHE4If
- Sep 7, 20266.2x their median
Los ERRORES de Trump POSICIONAN a MARÍA CORINA https://t.co/EBAhtniSXK
- Sep 4, 20262.8x their median
El cuestionamiento de María Corina Machado al acuerdo petrolero desafía tanto a Caracas como a Washington y anticipa un giro estratégico en el escenario político si se concreta su regreso a Venezuela https://t.co/kOQNQHECxN
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 133 interactions against 314K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 2.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 97% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 22x its own typical post.
- What is CastoOcando.com's engagement rate on X?
- CastoOcando.com (@cocando) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 314,147 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.042%, CastoOcando.com sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @cocando have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @cocando post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.