Back to @clickclickclick's profile

Click.Click.Click engagement report

@clickclickclick - 945K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 945K followers
Per impression
0.063%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 945K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 1% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.063% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.168% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Click.Click.Click's engagement rate beats 1% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Click.Click.Click sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.436%
p902.10%
p99160.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,214 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,785 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.436%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%86K
19:00 UTC-2%81K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%234K
Monday0%294K
Tuesday-3%288K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%247K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20269.0x their median

    Gen Z is taking a step back from dating apps and discovering new ways to connect through smaller and smaller online communities. https://t.co/XsZpsLFcKL

    36001.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20267.0x their median

    Google's Pixel smartphones will get the feature first. https://t.co/C1nOXQoAHv https://t.co/LN3B884k99

    70001.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.0x their median

    Leaked code and new reporting point to a HomePod with a display, a tabletop robot, and more, alongside Apple's new Siri AI. https://t.co/CCZVTG97HP https://t.co/bqlLvidg6y

    34002.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20265.0x their median

    'Niu Lai' has reportedly dethroned ‘Obsession’ as the most profitable film of all time. https://t.co/OVJwzLrK4K

    05001.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20265.0x their median

    Why wait to see the game on Netflix? https://t.co/IjAEaVwp3e https://t.co/1ktbFUlYKX

    23002.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20265.0x their median

    The deal, which includes Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners, takes EA private and loads the company with $18 billion in debt. https://t.co/xoXO5ikRou

    13011.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.0x their median

    These four sites are upholding the kink-forward legacy of AFF. https://t.co/tbufSjG2Q3

    04003.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20264.0x their median

    Get Mashable’s latest news, trending stories, and hottest deals delivered directly to your screen. https://t.co/PeE6CZBbjY

    13001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20264.0x their median

    Get Mashable’s latest news, trending stories, and hottest deals delivered directly to your screen. https://t.co/FEA8yxfDa4

    13001.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.0x their median

    YouTube is changing how it counts views on videos. https://t.co/FYEpOcJhyS https://t.co/EqXxY3Me2e

    12002.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 945K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 1% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.063% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.168% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9 interactions, about 9.0x its own typical post.

What is Click.Click.Click's engagement rate on X?
Click.Click.Click (@clickclickclick) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 945,128 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Click.Click.Click sits below the 10th percentile of the 37,214 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @clickclickclick have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 1% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @clickclickclick post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going